Benefit of cilostazol in patients with high risk of bleeding: Subanalysis of cilostazol stroke prevention study 2

Shinichiro Uchiyama, Yukito Shinohara, Yasuo Katayama, Takenori Yamaguchi, Shunnosuke Handa, Kempei Matsuoka, Yasuo Ohashi, Norio Tanahashi, Hiroko Yamamoto, Chokoh Genka, Yasuhisa Kitagawa, Hideo Kusuoka, Katsuya Nishimaru, Motoo Tsushima, Yukihiro Koretsune, Tohru Sawada, Chikuma Hamada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study 2 (CSPS 2) showed that cilostazol significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 25.7% relative to aspirin, with significantly fewer hemorrhagic events, in patients with prior ischemic stroke, excluding cardioembolic stroke. However, whether the benefit of cilostazol is sustained in patients with a high risk of bleeding has not been examined. Methods: We conducted a subanalysis of CSPS 2 to examine whether known risk factors for hemorrhagic stroke, such as stroke subtype and systolic blood pressure (SBP), influence the efficacy of the study drugs on hemorrhagic stroke. The relative risk reduction of hemorrhagic stroke was determined from the incidences calculated by the person-year method. The cumulative incidence rates of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke were estimated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Incidences of serious hemorrhage and hemorrhage requiring hospital admission were also evaluated in the two treatment groups. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated by the Cox proportion hazard model for cilostazol versus aspirin were assessed, and a log-rank test was used for the comparison between treatments. Results: The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with prior lacunar stroke (0.36 vs. 1.20% in person-year, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p < 0.01), but not among those with prior atherothrombotic stroke (0.31 vs. 0.59% in person-year, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.14-2.0, p = 0.34). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group throughout all SBP categories (Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p < 0.01) including SBP above 140 mm Hg (cilostazol 0.45% vs. aspirin 1.44% in person-year; Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p = 0.02). Cilostazol, compared with aspirin, significantly reduced the incidence of cerebral hemorrhage (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.70, p < 0.01), overall hemorrhage requiring hospital admission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97, p = 0.04), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding requiring hospital admission (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.90, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Hemorrhagic stroke was less frequent in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with lacunar stroke as well as those with increased blood pressure levels. As for extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, GI bleeding was also less frequent in the cilostazol than in the aspirin group. Cilostazol is supposed to be a therapeutic option to replace aspirin for secondary stroke prevention, especially in these subgroups with high risks for hemorrhagic events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-303
Number of pages8
JournalCerebrovascular Diseases
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Aspirin
  • Blood pressure
  • Cilostazol
  • Hemorrhagic stroke
  • Lacunar stroke
  • Secondary prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Benefit of cilostazol in patients with high risk of bleeding: Subanalysis of cilostazol stroke prevention study 2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this