Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002

Denis Nash, Christina Chan, Deborah Horowitz, David Vlahov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Breast and cervical cancer screening both are routinely recommended for women. However, data are sparse on factors associated with joint screening behaviors. Our objective to describe the factors associated with receiving both, one, or neither screening test among women aged ≥50. Methods: Using data from the New York City Community Health Survey (NYC CHS), we compared the characteristics of women > age 50 (n = 2059) who missed (1) a Pap smear only, (2) mammography only, or (3) both screening procedures with the characteristics of women who received both tests. Analyses were performed using multiple logistic regression. Results: Seventy-three percent of women had both screening tests, 6.7% needed a Pap smear only, 10% missed mammography only, and 10% missed both tests. After multiple logistic regression, missing a Pap smear only was more likely among women >70 years compared with younger women and among women from Queens than from Manhattan. Missing mammography only was more common among women not reporting a personal doctor than among those with a doctor and among uninsured women relative to the privately insured. Missing both tests was more common among women >74 years, current smokers compared with never smokers, women without a personal doctor, and the uninsured. This was less common among women from the Bronx than women from Manhattan and among racial/ethnic minorities compared with non-Hispanic white women. Conclusions: The predictors of each screening outcome appear to be qualitatively different. Changes in provider practices and targeted education may improve Pap smear screening rates, whereas policy initiatives and increased access for the uninsured may raise mammography rates. To achieve optimal preventive care, coscreening should be considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-56
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Women's Health
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms
Papanicolaou Test
Mammography
Logistic Models
Preventive Medicine
Health Surveys
Joints

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002. / Nash, Denis; Chan, Christina; Horowitz, Deborah; Vlahov, David.

In: Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 46-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nash, Denis ; Chan, Christina ; Horowitz, Deborah ; Vlahov, David. / Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002. In: Journal of Women's Health. 2007 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 46-56.
@article{338f5d67763247ff8e9ec7683465b105,
title = "Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002",
abstract = "Objectives: Breast and cervical cancer screening both are routinely recommended for women. However, data are sparse on factors associated with joint screening behaviors. Our objective to describe the factors associated with receiving both, one, or neither screening test among women aged ≥50. Methods: Using data from the New York City Community Health Survey (NYC CHS), we compared the characteristics of women > age 50 (n = 2059) who missed (1) a Pap smear only, (2) mammography only, or (3) both screening procedures with the characteristics of women who received both tests. Analyses were performed using multiple logistic regression. Results: Seventy-three percent of women had both screening tests, 6.7{\%} needed a Pap smear only, 10{\%} missed mammography only, and 10{\%} missed both tests. After multiple logistic regression, missing a Pap smear only was more likely among women >70 years compared with younger women and among women from Queens than from Manhattan. Missing mammography only was more common among women not reporting a personal doctor than among those with a doctor and among uninsured women relative to the privately insured. Missing both tests was more common among women >74 years, current smokers compared with never smokers, women without a personal doctor, and the uninsured. This was less common among women from the Bronx than women from Manhattan and among racial/ethnic minorities compared with non-Hispanic white women. Conclusions: The predictors of each screening outcome appear to be qualitatively different. Changes in provider practices and targeted education may improve Pap smear screening rates, whereas policy initiatives and increased access for the uninsured may raise mammography rates. To achieve optimal preventive care, coscreening should be considered.",
author = "Denis Nash and Christina Chan and Deborah Horowitz and David Vlahov",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jwh.2006.0079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "46--56",
journal = "Journal of Women's Health",
issn = "1540-9996",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002

AU - Nash, Denis

AU - Chan, Christina

AU - Horowitz, Deborah

AU - Vlahov, David

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Objectives: Breast and cervical cancer screening both are routinely recommended for women. However, data are sparse on factors associated with joint screening behaviors. Our objective to describe the factors associated with receiving both, one, or neither screening test among women aged ≥50. Methods: Using data from the New York City Community Health Survey (NYC CHS), we compared the characteristics of women > age 50 (n = 2059) who missed (1) a Pap smear only, (2) mammography only, or (3) both screening procedures with the characteristics of women who received both tests. Analyses were performed using multiple logistic regression. Results: Seventy-three percent of women had both screening tests, 6.7% needed a Pap smear only, 10% missed mammography only, and 10% missed both tests. After multiple logistic regression, missing a Pap smear only was more likely among women >70 years compared with younger women and among women from Queens than from Manhattan. Missing mammography only was more common among women not reporting a personal doctor than among those with a doctor and among uninsured women relative to the privately insured. Missing both tests was more common among women >74 years, current smokers compared with never smokers, women without a personal doctor, and the uninsured. This was less common among women from the Bronx than women from Manhattan and among racial/ethnic minorities compared with non-Hispanic white women. Conclusions: The predictors of each screening outcome appear to be qualitatively different. Changes in provider practices and targeted education may improve Pap smear screening rates, whereas policy initiatives and increased access for the uninsured may raise mammography rates. To achieve optimal preventive care, coscreening should be considered.

AB - Objectives: Breast and cervical cancer screening both are routinely recommended for women. However, data are sparse on factors associated with joint screening behaviors. Our objective to describe the factors associated with receiving both, one, or neither screening test among women aged ≥50. Methods: Using data from the New York City Community Health Survey (NYC CHS), we compared the characteristics of women > age 50 (n = 2059) who missed (1) a Pap smear only, (2) mammography only, or (3) both screening procedures with the characteristics of women who received both tests. Analyses were performed using multiple logistic regression. Results: Seventy-three percent of women had both screening tests, 6.7% needed a Pap smear only, 10% missed mammography only, and 10% missed both tests. After multiple logistic regression, missing a Pap smear only was more likely among women >70 years compared with younger women and among women from Queens than from Manhattan. Missing mammography only was more common among women not reporting a personal doctor than among those with a doctor and among uninsured women relative to the privately insured. Missing both tests was more common among women >74 years, current smokers compared with never smokers, women without a personal doctor, and the uninsured. This was less common among women from the Bronx than women from Manhattan and among racial/ethnic minorities compared with non-Hispanic white women. Conclusions: The predictors of each screening outcome appear to be qualitatively different. Changes in provider practices and targeted education may improve Pap smear screening rates, whereas policy initiatives and increased access for the uninsured may raise mammography rates. To achieve optimal preventive care, coscreening should be considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847188541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847188541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2006.0079

DO - 10.1089/jwh.2006.0079

M3 - Article

C2 - 17324096

AN - SCOPUS:33847188541

VL - 16

SP - 46

EP - 56

JO - Journal of Women's Health

JF - Journal of Women's Health

SN - 1540-9996

IS - 1

ER -