Barriers and Facilitators of Mentoring for Trainees and Early Career Investigators in Rheumatology Research: Current State, Identification of Needs, and Road Map to an Inter-Institutional Adult Rheumatology Mentoring Program

Alexis Ogdie, Jeffrey A. Sparks, Sheila T. Angeles-Han, Kathleen Bush, Flavia V. Castelino, Amit Golding, Yihui Jiang, J. Michelle Kahlenberg, Alfred H.J. Kim, Yvonne C. Lee, Kirthi Machireddy, Michael J. Ombrello, Ami Shah, Zachary S. Wallace, Peter A. Nigrovic, Una E. Makris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine perceived barriers and facilitators to effective mentoring for early career rheumatology investigators and to develop a framework for an inter-institutional mentoring program. Methods: Focus groups or interviews with rheumatology fellows, junior faculty, and mentors were conducted, audiorecorded, and transcribed. Content analysis was performed using NVivo software. Themes were grouped into categories (e.g., mentor-mentee relationship, barriers, and facilitators of a productive relationship). Rheumatology fellows and early career investigators were also surveyed nationwide to identify specific needs to be addressed through an inter-institutional mentoring program. Results: Twenty-five individuals participated in focus groups or interviews. Attributes of the ideal mentee-mentor relationship included communication, accessibility, regular meetings, shared interests, aligned goals, and mutual respect. The mentee should be proactive, efficient, engaged, committed, focused, accountable, and respectful of the mentor's time. The mentor should support/promote the mentee, shape the mentee's goals and career plan, address day-to-day questions, provide critical feedback, be available, and have team leadership skills. Barriers included difficulty with career path navigation, gaining independence, internal competition, authorship, time demands, funding, and work-life balance. Facilitators of a successful relationship included having a diverse network of mentors filling different roles, mentor-mentee relationship management, and confidence. Among 187 survey respondents, the primary uses of an inter-institutional mentoring program were career development planning and oversight, goal-setting, and networking. Conclusions: In this mixed-methods study, tangible factors for optimizing the mentor-mentee relationship were identified and will inform the development of an adult rheumatology inter-institutional mentoring program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalArthritis Care and Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Mentors
Rheumatology
Research Personnel
Research
Focus Groups
Interviews
Authorship
Mentoring
Software
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Cite this

Barriers and Facilitators of Mentoring for Trainees and Early Career Investigators in Rheumatology Research : Current State, Identification of Needs, and Road Map to an Inter-Institutional Adult Rheumatology Mentoring Program. / Ogdie, Alexis; Sparks, Jeffrey A.; Angeles-Han, Sheila T.; Bush, Kathleen; Castelino, Flavia V.; Golding, Amit; Jiang, Yihui; Kahlenberg, J. Michelle; Kim, Alfred H.J.; Lee, Yvonne C.; Machireddy, Kirthi; Ombrello, Michael J.; Shah, Ami; Wallace, Zachary S.; Nigrovic, Peter A.; Makris, Una E.

In: Arthritis Care and Research, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ogdie, A, Sparks, JA, Angeles-Han, ST, Bush, K, Castelino, FV, Golding, A, Jiang, Y, Kahlenberg, JM, Kim, AHJ, Lee, YC, Machireddy, K, Ombrello, MJ, Shah, A, Wallace, ZS, Nigrovic, PA & Makris, UE 2018, 'Barriers and Facilitators of Mentoring for Trainees and Early Career Investigators in Rheumatology Research: Current State, Identification of Needs, and Road Map to an Inter-Institutional Adult Rheumatology Mentoring Program', Arthritis Care and Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23286
Ogdie, Alexis ; Sparks, Jeffrey A. ; Angeles-Han, Sheila T. ; Bush, Kathleen ; Castelino, Flavia V. ; Golding, Amit ; Jiang, Yihui ; Kahlenberg, J. Michelle ; Kim, Alfred H.J. ; Lee, Yvonne C. ; Machireddy, Kirthi ; Ombrello, Michael J. ; Shah, Ami ; Wallace, Zachary S. ; Nigrovic, Peter A. ; Makris, Una E. / Barriers and Facilitators of Mentoring for Trainees and Early Career Investigators in Rheumatology Research : Current State, Identification of Needs, and Road Map to an Inter-Institutional Adult Rheumatology Mentoring Program. In: Arthritis Care and Research. 2018.
@article{1577405e5a474249b65ca3ee5475c168,
title = "Barriers and Facilitators of Mentoring for Trainees and Early Career Investigators in Rheumatology Research: Current State, Identification of Needs, and Road Map to an Inter-Institutional Adult Rheumatology Mentoring Program",
abstract = "Objective: To determine perceived barriers and facilitators to effective mentoring for early career rheumatology investigators and to develop a framework for an inter-institutional mentoring program. Methods: Focus groups or interviews with rheumatology fellows, junior faculty, and mentors were conducted, audiorecorded, and transcribed. Content analysis was performed using NVivo software. Themes were grouped into categories (e.g., mentor-mentee relationship, barriers, and facilitators of a productive relationship). Rheumatology fellows and early career investigators were also surveyed nationwide to identify specific needs to be addressed through an inter-institutional mentoring program. Results: Twenty-five individuals participated in focus groups or interviews. Attributes of the ideal mentee-mentor relationship included communication, accessibility, regular meetings, shared interests, aligned goals, and mutual respect. The mentee should be proactive, efficient, engaged, committed, focused, accountable, and respectful of the mentor's time. The mentor should support/promote the mentee, shape the mentee's goals and career plan, address day-to-day questions, provide critical feedback, be available, and have team leadership skills. Barriers included difficulty with career path navigation, gaining independence, internal competition, authorship, time demands, funding, and work-life balance. Facilitators of a successful relationship included having a diverse network of mentors filling different roles, mentor-mentee relationship management, and confidence. Among 187 survey respondents, the primary uses of an inter-institutional mentoring program were career development planning and oversight, goal-setting, and networking. Conclusions: In this mixed-methods study, tangible factors for optimizing the mentor-mentee relationship were identified and will inform the development of an adult rheumatology inter-institutional mentoring program.",
author = "Alexis Ogdie and Sparks, {Jeffrey A.} and Angeles-Han, {Sheila T.} and Kathleen Bush and Castelino, {Flavia V.} and Amit Golding and Yihui Jiang and Kahlenberg, {J. Michelle} and Kim, {Alfred H.J.} and Lee, {Yvonne C.} and Kirthi Machireddy and Ombrello, {Michael J.} and Ami Shah and Wallace, {Zachary S.} and Nigrovic, {Peter A.} and Makris, {Una E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acr.23286",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Arthritis and Rheumatology",
issn = "2326-5191",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers and Facilitators of Mentoring for Trainees and Early Career Investigators in Rheumatology Research

T2 - Current State, Identification of Needs, and Road Map to an Inter-Institutional Adult Rheumatology Mentoring Program

AU - Ogdie, Alexis

AU - Sparks, Jeffrey A.

AU - Angeles-Han, Sheila T.

AU - Bush, Kathleen

AU - Castelino, Flavia V.

AU - Golding, Amit

AU - Jiang, Yihui

AU - Kahlenberg, J. Michelle

AU - Kim, Alfred H.J.

AU - Lee, Yvonne C.

AU - Machireddy, Kirthi

AU - Ombrello, Michael J.

AU - Shah, Ami

AU - Wallace, Zachary S.

AU - Nigrovic, Peter A.

AU - Makris, Una E.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine perceived barriers and facilitators to effective mentoring for early career rheumatology investigators and to develop a framework for an inter-institutional mentoring program. Methods: Focus groups or interviews with rheumatology fellows, junior faculty, and mentors were conducted, audiorecorded, and transcribed. Content analysis was performed using NVivo software. Themes were grouped into categories (e.g., mentor-mentee relationship, barriers, and facilitators of a productive relationship). Rheumatology fellows and early career investigators were also surveyed nationwide to identify specific needs to be addressed through an inter-institutional mentoring program. Results: Twenty-five individuals participated in focus groups or interviews. Attributes of the ideal mentee-mentor relationship included communication, accessibility, regular meetings, shared interests, aligned goals, and mutual respect. The mentee should be proactive, efficient, engaged, committed, focused, accountable, and respectful of the mentor's time. The mentor should support/promote the mentee, shape the mentee's goals and career plan, address day-to-day questions, provide critical feedback, be available, and have team leadership skills. Barriers included difficulty with career path navigation, gaining independence, internal competition, authorship, time demands, funding, and work-life balance. Facilitators of a successful relationship included having a diverse network of mentors filling different roles, mentor-mentee relationship management, and confidence. Among 187 survey respondents, the primary uses of an inter-institutional mentoring program were career development planning and oversight, goal-setting, and networking. Conclusions: In this mixed-methods study, tangible factors for optimizing the mentor-mentee relationship were identified and will inform the development of an adult rheumatology inter-institutional mentoring program.

AB - Objective: To determine perceived barriers and facilitators to effective mentoring for early career rheumatology investigators and to develop a framework for an inter-institutional mentoring program. Methods: Focus groups or interviews with rheumatology fellows, junior faculty, and mentors were conducted, audiorecorded, and transcribed. Content analysis was performed using NVivo software. Themes were grouped into categories (e.g., mentor-mentee relationship, barriers, and facilitators of a productive relationship). Rheumatology fellows and early career investigators were also surveyed nationwide to identify specific needs to be addressed through an inter-institutional mentoring program. Results: Twenty-five individuals participated in focus groups or interviews. Attributes of the ideal mentee-mentor relationship included communication, accessibility, regular meetings, shared interests, aligned goals, and mutual respect. The mentee should be proactive, efficient, engaged, committed, focused, accountable, and respectful of the mentor's time. The mentor should support/promote the mentee, shape the mentee's goals and career plan, address day-to-day questions, provide critical feedback, be available, and have team leadership skills. Barriers included difficulty with career path navigation, gaining independence, internal competition, authorship, time demands, funding, and work-life balance. Facilitators of a successful relationship included having a diverse network of mentors filling different roles, mentor-mentee relationship management, and confidence. Among 187 survey respondents, the primary uses of an inter-institutional mentoring program were career development planning and oversight, goal-setting, and networking. Conclusions: In this mixed-methods study, tangible factors for optimizing the mentor-mentee relationship were identified and will inform the development of an adult rheumatology inter-institutional mentoring program.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041608430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041608430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acr.23286

DO - 10.1002/acr.23286

M3 - Article

C2 - 28544766

AN - SCOPUS:85041608430

JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology

JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology

SN - 2326-5191

ER -