Bare bones laparoscopy: A randomized prospective trial of cost savings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Matthew R. Brackman, Eva Foley, Jesus Esquivel, Marc E. Boisvert, Sallie Davis, Enrique Daza, John R. Kirkpatrick, Frederick C. Finelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Rising costs and lowered reimbursements make value essential if laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is to be offered to patients without condemning providers to financial loss. We hypothesize that our protocol increases this value. Once practiced, operative time, complications, and patient satisfaction compare with those of the typical method. Methods: We prospectively randomized 50 consecutive patients equally to control or experimental LC according to our protocol. Equipment costs, operative time, conversions, complications, pain, and return to work were compared. The student's t test was used for comparisons. Results: Mean disposable equipment costs were $173.00 ± $43.45 and $434.42 ± $50.54 for the study and control groups, respectively (P <.0001). Mean operative times were 67.26 ± 15 and 70.60 ± 19 minutes, respectively. Conclusions: The "bare bones" protocol is safe. It has a short learning curve, demonstrates a cost advantage over the common method, and requires no additional operative time. Pain, time to return to work, and satisfaction are equivalent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-417
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume12
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cost Savings
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Operative Time
Laparoscopy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Bone and Bones
Return to Work
Disposable Equipment
Pain
Learning Curve
Job Satisfaction
Patient Satisfaction
Students
Equipment and Supplies
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Brackman, M. R., Foley, E., Esquivel, J., Boisvert, M. E., Davis, S., Daza, E., ... Finelli, F. C. (2002). Bare bones laparoscopy: A randomized prospective trial of cost savings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, 12(6), 411-417.

Bare bones laparoscopy : A randomized prospective trial of cost savings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. / Brackman, Matthew R.; Foley, Eva; Esquivel, Jesus; Boisvert, Marc E.; Davis, Sallie; Daza, Enrique; Kirkpatrick, John R.; Finelli, Frederick C.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.12.2002, p. 411-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brackman, MR, Foley, E, Esquivel, J, Boisvert, ME, Davis, S, Daza, E, Kirkpatrick, JR & Finelli, FC 2002, 'Bare bones laparoscopy: A randomized prospective trial of cost savings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy', Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 411-417.
Brackman, Matthew R. ; Foley, Eva ; Esquivel, Jesus ; Boisvert, Marc E. ; Davis, Sallie ; Daza, Enrique ; Kirkpatrick, John R. ; Finelli, Frederick C. / Bare bones laparoscopy : A randomized prospective trial of cost savings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2002 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 411-417.
@article{c7421790d782452ab0f2d66e3e10b86a,
title = "Bare bones laparoscopy: A randomized prospective trial of cost savings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy",
abstract = "Objective: Rising costs and lowered reimbursements make value essential if laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is to be offered to patients without condemning providers to financial loss. We hypothesize that our protocol increases this value. Once practiced, operative time, complications, and patient satisfaction compare with those of the typical method. Methods: We prospectively randomized 50 consecutive patients equally to control or experimental LC according to our protocol. Equipment costs, operative time, conversions, complications, pain, and return to work were compared. The student's t test was used for comparisons. Results: Mean disposable equipment costs were $173.00 ± $43.45 and $434.42 ± $50.54 for the study and control groups, respectively (P <.0001). Mean operative times were 67.26 ± 15 and 70.60 ± 19 minutes, respectively. Conclusions: The {"}bare bones{"} protocol is safe. It has a short learning curve, demonstrates a cost advantage over the common method, and requires no additional operative time. Pain, time to return to work, and satisfaction are equivalent.",
author = "Brackman, {Matthew R.} and Eva Foley and Jesus Esquivel and Boisvert, {Marc E.} and Sallie Davis and Enrique Daza and Kirkpatrick, {John R.} and Finelli, {Frederick C.}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "411--417",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bare bones laparoscopy

T2 - A randomized prospective trial of cost savings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

AU - Brackman, Matthew R.

AU - Foley, Eva

AU - Esquivel, Jesus

AU - Boisvert, Marc E.

AU - Davis, Sallie

AU - Daza, Enrique

AU - Kirkpatrick, John R.

AU - Finelli, Frederick C.

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Objective: Rising costs and lowered reimbursements make value essential if laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is to be offered to patients without condemning providers to financial loss. We hypothesize that our protocol increases this value. Once practiced, operative time, complications, and patient satisfaction compare with those of the typical method. Methods: We prospectively randomized 50 consecutive patients equally to control or experimental LC according to our protocol. Equipment costs, operative time, conversions, complications, pain, and return to work were compared. The student's t test was used for comparisons. Results: Mean disposable equipment costs were $173.00 ± $43.45 and $434.42 ± $50.54 for the study and control groups, respectively (P <.0001). Mean operative times were 67.26 ± 15 and 70.60 ± 19 minutes, respectively. Conclusions: The "bare bones" protocol is safe. It has a short learning curve, demonstrates a cost advantage over the common method, and requires no additional operative time. Pain, time to return to work, and satisfaction are equivalent.

AB - Objective: Rising costs and lowered reimbursements make value essential if laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is to be offered to patients without condemning providers to financial loss. We hypothesize that our protocol increases this value. Once practiced, operative time, complications, and patient satisfaction compare with those of the typical method. Methods: We prospectively randomized 50 consecutive patients equally to control or experimental LC according to our protocol. Equipment costs, operative time, conversions, complications, pain, and return to work were compared. The student's t test was used for comparisons. Results: Mean disposable equipment costs were $173.00 ± $43.45 and $434.42 ± $50.54 for the study and control groups, respectively (P <.0001). Mean operative times were 67.26 ± 15 and 70.60 ± 19 minutes, respectively. Conclusions: The "bare bones" protocol is safe. It has a short learning curve, demonstrates a cost advantage over the common method, and requires no additional operative time. Pain, time to return to work, and satisfaction are equivalent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036964541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036964541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12590721

AN - SCOPUS:0036964541

VL - 12

SP - 411

EP - 417

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 6

ER -