Balancing scientific and community interests in community-based participatory research

David B. Resnik, Caitlin E Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Community-based participatory research is an approach to studying human populations that emphasizes extensive partnerships between researchers and community members. While there are many advantages of this approach, it also faces a number of conceptual and practical challenges, one of which is managing the conflict that sometimes arises between promoting scientific and community interests. This essay explores the potential conflict between scientific and community interests in several different stages of community-based participatory research, including research design, data interpretation, and publication, and makes some suggestions for practice and policy. To manage potential conflicts between scientific and community interests, investigators and community partners should enter into written agreements at the beginning of the study. In some cases, it may be necessary for a third party, such as a review committee from a supporting institution, the community, or a funding agency, to help investigators and community partners resolve disagreements. It may also be useful, in some situations, to publish a dissenting opinion when investigators and community partners cannot agree on how to interpret findings resulting from a study. These strategies may help address some of the challenges of implementing community-based participatory research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)198-210
Number of pages13
JournalAccountability in Research
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

community
conflict potential
research planning
funding
interpretation

Keywords

  • Community based participatory research
  • Data interpretation
  • Data sharing
  • Ethics
  • Objectivity
  • Openness
  • Publication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Balancing scientific and community interests in community-based participatory research. / Resnik, David B.; Kennedy, Caitlin E.

In: Accountability in Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2010, p. 198-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{075ced54566b43fc9d206b5fddce1c7e,
title = "Balancing scientific and community interests in community-based participatory research",
abstract = "Community-based participatory research is an approach to studying human populations that emphasizes extensive partnerships between researchers and community members. While there are many advantages of this approach, it also faces a number of conceptual and practical challenges, one of which is managing the conflict that sometimes arises between promoting scientific and community interests. This essay explores the potential conflict between scientific and community interests in several different stages of community-based participatory research, including research design, data interpretation, and publication, and makes some suggestions for practice and policy. To manage potential conflicts between scientific and community interests, investigators and community partners should enter into written agreements at the beginning of the study. In some cases, it may be necessary for a third party, such as a review committee from a supporting institution, the community, or a funding agency, to help investigators and community partners resolve disagreements. It may also be useful, in some situations, to publish a dissenting opinion when investigators and community partners cannot agree on how to interpret findings resulting from a study. These strategies may help address some of the challenges of implementing community-based participatory research.",
keywords = "Community based participatory research, Data interpretation, Data sharing, Ethics, Objectivity, Openness, Publication",
author = "Resnik, {David B.} and Kennedy, {Caitlin E}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/08989621.2010.493095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "198--210",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing scientific and community interests in community-based participatory research

AU - Resnik, David B.

AU - Kennedy, Caitlin E

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Community-based participatory research is an approach to studying human populations that emphasizes extensive partnerships between researchers and community members. While there are many advantages of this approach, it also faces a number of conceptual and practical challenges, one of which is managing the conflict that sometimes arises between promoting scientific and community interests. This essay explores the potential conflict between scientific and community interests in several different stages of community-based participatory research, including research design, data interpretation, and publication, and makes some suggestions for practice and policy. To manage potential conflicts between scientific and community interests, investigators and community partners should enter into written agreements at the beginning of the study. In some cases, it may be necessary for a third party, such as a review committee from a supporting institution, the community, or a funding agency, to help investigators and community partners resolve disagreements. It may also be useful, in some situations, to publish a dissenting opinion when investigators and community partners cannot agree on how to interpret findings resulting from a study. These strategies may help address some of the challenges of implementing community-based participatory research.

AB - Community-based participatory research is an approach to studying human populations that emphasizes extensive partnerships between researchers and community members. While there are many advantages of this approach, it also faces a number of conceptual and practical challenges, one of which is managing the conflict that sometimes arises between promoting scientific and community interests. This essay explores the potential conflict between scientific and community interests in several different stages of community-based participatory research, including research design, data interpretation, and publication, and makes some suggestions for practice and policy. To manage potential conflicts between scientific and community interests, investigators and community partners should enter into written agreements at the beginning of the study. In some cases, it may be necessary for a third party, such as a review committee from a supporting institution, the community, or a funding agency, to help investigators and community partners resolve disagreements. It may also be useful, in some situations, to publish a dissenting opinion when investigators and community partners cannot agree on how to interpret findings resulting from a study. These strategies may help address some of the challenges of implementing community-based participatory research.

KW - Community based participatory research

KW - Data interpretation

KW - Data sharing

KW - Ethics

KW - Objectivity

KW - Openness

KW - Publication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954248042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954248042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2010.493095

DO - 10.1080/08989621.2010.493095

M3 - Article

C2 - 20597018

AN - SCOPUS:77954248042

VL - 17

SP - 198

EP - 210

JO - Accountability in Research

JF - Accountability in Research

SN - 0898-9621

IS - 4

ER -