Availability of New Medicaid Patient Appointments and the Role of Rural Health Clinics

Michael R. Richards, Brendan Saloner, Genevieve M. Kenney, Karin V. Rhodes, Daniel E. Polsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine the willingness to accept new Medicaid patients among certified rural health clinics (RHCs) and other nonsafety net rural providers. Data Sources: Experimental (audit) data from a 10-state study of primary care practices, county-level information from the Area Health Resource File, and RHC information from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Study Design: We generate appointment rates for rural and nonrural areas by patient-payer type (private, Medicaid, self-pay) to then motivate our focus on within-rural variation by clinic type (RHC vs. non-RHC). Multivariate linear models test for statistical differences and assess the estimates' sensitivity to the inclusion of control variables. Data Collection: The primary data are from a large field study. Principal Findings: Approximately 80 percent of Medicaid callers receive an appointment in rural areas-a rate more than 20 percentage points greater than nonrural areas. Importantly, within rural areas, RHCs offer appointments to prospective Medicaid patients nearly 95 percent of the time, while the rural (nonsafety net) non-RHC Medicaid rate is less than 75 percent. Measured differences are robust to covariate adjustment. Conclusions: Our study suggests that RHC status, with its alternative payment model, is strongly associated with new Medicaid patient acceptance. Altering RHC financial incentives may have consequences for rural Medicaid enrollees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth Services Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

Rural Health
Medicaid
Appointments and Schedules
Social Adjustment
Information Centers
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Health Resources
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health
Health Status
Motivation
Linear Models
Primary Health Care

Keywords

  • Audit methodology
  • Medicaid
  • Primary care
  • Rural health care
  • Rural health clinics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Availability of New Medicaid Patient Appointments and the Role of Rural Health Clinics. / Richards, Michael R.; Saloner, Brendan; Kenney, Genevieve M.; Rhodes, Karin V.; Polsky, Daniel E.

In: Health Services Research, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{289ab7bd20ce41d0b05c24c39495f55c,
title = "Availability of New Medicaid Patient Appointments and the Role of Rural Health Clinics",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the willingness to accept new Medicaid patients among certified rural health clinics (RHCs) and other nonsafety net rural providers. Data Sources: Experimental (audit) data from a 10-state study of primary care practices, county-level information from the Area Health Resource File, and RHC information from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Study Design: We generate appointment rates for rural and nonrural areas by patient-payer type (private, Medicaid, self-pay) to then motivate our focus on within-rural variation by clinic type (RHC vs. non-RHC). Multivariate linear models test for statistical differences and assess the estimates' sensitivity to the inclusion of control variables. Data Collection: The primary data are from a large field study. Principal Findings: Approximately 80 percent of Medicaid callers receive an appointment in rural areas-a rate more than 20 percentage points greater than nonrural areas. Importantly, within rural areas, RHCs offer appointments to prospective Medicaid patients nearly 95 percent of the time, while the rural (nonsafety net) non-RHC Medicaid rate is less than 75 percent. Measured differences are robust to covariate adjustment. Conclusions: Our study suggests that RHC status, with its alternative payment model, is strongly associated with new Medicaid patient acceptance. Altering RHC financial incentives may have consequences for rural Medicaid enrollees.",
keywords = "Audit methodology, Medicaid, Primary care, Rural health care, Rural health clinics",
author = "Richards, {Michael R.} and Brendan Saloner and Kenney, {Genevieve M.} and Rhodes, {Karin V.} and Polsky, {Daniel E.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.12334",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Availability of New Medicaid Patient Appointments and the Role of Rural Health Clinics

AU - Richards, Michael R.

AU - Saloner, Brendan

AU - Kenney, Genevieve M.

AU - Rhodes, Karin V.

AU - Polsky, Daniel E.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objective: To examine the willingness to accept new Medicaid patients among certified rural health clinics (RHCs) and other nonsafety net rural providers. Data Sources: Experimental (audit) data from a 10-state study of primary care practices, county-level information from the Area Health Resource File, and RHC information from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Study Design: We generate appointment rates for rural and nonrural areas by patient-payer type (private, Medicaid, self-pay) to then motivate our focus on within-rural variation by clinic type (RHC vs. non-RHC). Multivariate linear models test for statistical differences and assess the estimates' sensitivity to the inclusion of control variables. Data Collection: The primary data are from a large field study. Principal Findings: Approximately 80 percent of Medicaid callers receive an appointment in rural areas-a rate more than 20 percentage points greater than nonrural areas. Importantly, within rural areas, RHCs offer appointments to prospective Medicaid patients nearly 95 percent of the time, while the rural (nonsafety net) non-RHC Medicaid rate is less than 75 percent. Measured differences are robust to covariate adjustment. Conclusions: Our study suggests that RHC status, with its alternative payment model, is strongly associated with new Medicaid patient acceptance. Altering RHC financial incentives may have consequences for rural Medicaid enrollees.

AB - Objective: To examine the willingness to accept new Medicaid patients among certified rural health clinics (RHCs) and other nonsafety net rural providers. Data Sources: Experimental (audit) data from a 10-state study of primary care practices, county-level information from the Area Health Resource File, and RHC information from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Study Design: We generate appointment rates for rural and nonrural areas by patient-payer type (private, Medicaid, self-pay) to then motivate our focus on within-rural variation by clinic type (RHC vs. non-RHC). Multivariate linear models test for statistical differences and assess the estimates' sensitivity to the inclusion of control variables. Data Collection: The primary data are from a large field study. Principal Findings: Approximately 80 percent of Medicaid callers receive an appointment in rural areas-a rate more than 20 percentage points greater than nonrural areas. Importantly, within rural areas, RHCs offer appointments to prospective Medicaid patients nearly 95 percent of the time, while the rural (nonsafety net) non-RHC Medicaid rate is less than 75 percent. Measured differences are robust to covariate adjustment. Conclusions: Our study suggests that RHC status, with its alternative payment model, is strongly associated with new Medicaid patient acceptance. Altering RHC financial incentives may have consequences for rural Medicaid enrollees.

KW - Audit methodology

KW - Medicaid

KW - Primary care

KW - Rural health care

KW - Rural health clinics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933566344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933566344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12334

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12334

M3 - Article

C2 - 26119695

AN - SCOPUS:84933566344

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

ER -