TY - JOUR
T1 - Autoimmune psychosis
T2 - an international consensus on an approach to the diagnosis and management of psychosis of suspected autoimmune origin
AU - Pollak, Thomas A.
AU - Lennox, Belinda R.
AU - Müller, Sabine
AU - Benros, Michael E.
AU - Prüss, Harald
AU - Tebartz van Elst, Ludger
AU - Klein, Hans
AU - Steiner, Johann
AU - Frodl, Thomas
AU - Bogerts, Bernhard
AU - Tian, Li
AU - Groc, Laurent
AU - Hasan, Alkomiet
AU - Baune, Bernhard T.
AU - Endres, Dominique
AU - Haroon, Ebrahim
AU - Yolken, Robert
AU - Benedetti, Francesco
AU - Halaris, Angelos
AU - Meyer, Jeffrey H.
AU - Stassen, Hans
AU - Leboyer, Marion
AU - Fuchs, Dietmar
AU - Otto, Markus
AU - Brown, David A.
AU - Vincent, Angela
AU - Najjar, Souhel
AU - Bechter, Karl
N1 - Funding Information:
LT acknowledges the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission number. Z171100001017021 and the Estonian Research Council-European Union Regional Developmental Fund Mobilitas Pluss Program number. MOBTT77. EH wishes to acknowledge funding support from the US National Institutes of Health, via R01MH107033 and R01MH112076. SM received support from the Federal Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF), Germany. TAP acknowledges funding of a clinical lectureship from the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR). BRL acknowledges funding support from NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre. JS and BB raised the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) funding for the Psychoimmunology Expert Meetings in 2007, 2009, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. DAB acknowledges funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, and the Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical Research. MEB wishes to acknowledge funding from the Independent Research Fund Denmark and by an unrestricted grant from The Lundbeck Foundation. We thank Mrs Anne-Katrin Baum for kindly providing the EEG image.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - There is increasing recognition in the neurological and psychiatric literature of patients with so-called isolated psychotic presentations (ie, with no, or minimal, neurological features) who have tested positive for neuronal autoantibodies (principally N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies) and who have responded to immunotherapies. Although these individuals are sometimes described as having atypical, mild, or attenuated forms of autoimmune encephalitis, some authors feel that that these cases are sufficiently different from typical autoimmune encephalitis to establish a new category of so-called autoimmune psychosis. We briefly review the background, discuss the existing evidence for a form of autoimmune psychosis, and propose a novel, conservative approach to the recognition of possible, probable, and definite autoimmune psychoses for use in psychiatric practice. We also outline the investigations required and the appropriate therapeutic approaches, both psychiatric and immunological, for probable and definite cases of autoimmune psychoses, and discuss the ethical issues posed by this challenging diagnostic category.
AB - There is increasing recognition in the neurological and psychiatric literature of patients with so-called isolated psychotic presentations (ie, with no, or minimal, neurological features) who have tested positive for neuronal autoantibodies (principally N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies) and who have responded to immunotherapies. Although these individuals are sometimes described as having atypical, mild, or attenuated forms of autoimmune encephalitis, some authors feel that that these cases are sufficiently different from typical autoimmune encephalitis to establish a new category of so-called autoimmune psychosis. We briefly review the background, discuss the existing evidence for a form of autoimmune psychosis, and propose a novel, conservative approach to the recognition of possible, probable, and definite autoimmune psychoses for use in psychiatric practice. We also outline the investigations required and the appropriate therapeutic approaches, both psychiatric and immunological, for probable and definite cases of autoimmune psychoses, and discuss the ethical issues posed by this challenging diagnostic category.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076729289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076729289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30290-1
DO - 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30290-1
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31669058
AN - SCOPUS:85076729289
SN - 2215-0366
VL - 7
SP - 93
EP - 108
JO - The Lancet Psychiatry
JF - The Lancet Psychiatry
IS - 1
ER -