Author Correction: The EphA2 receptor is activated through induction of distinct, ligand-dependent oligomeric structures (Communications Biology, (2018), 1, 1, (15), 10.1038/s42003-018-0017-7)

Deo R. Singh, Pranjali Kanvinde, Christopher King, Elena B. Pasquale, Kalina A Hristova

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The original published version of the paper contained labelling errors in Figures 1 and 5. The x-axis of Figure 1e was incorrectly labelled as “Receptors . μm2” instead of “Receptors . μm−2”. The figure key in Figure 5b incorrectly labelled the blue circles as “Wild-type” and the purple circles as “+m-ephrinA1”. The correct labels are blue: “Wild-type+m-ephrinA1” and purple: “Wild-type, no ligand.” The original version also contained a typesetting error in Table 1. The values in the second row, rightmost column, were not all set in bold text as required. The errors do not impact the conclusions in the main text of the paper. These errors have been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number40
JournalCommunications Biology
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

EphA2 Receptor
animal communication
Ligands
Biological Sciences
receptors
Communication
Typesetting
HTML
Labeling
Labels
ligands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Author Correction : The EphA2 receptor is activated through induction of distinct, ligand-dependent oligomeric structures (Communications Biology, (2018), 1, 1, (15), 10.1038/s42003-018-0017-7). / Singh, Deo R.; Kanvinde, Pranjali; King, Christopher; Pasquale, Elena B.; Hristova, Kalina A.

In: Communications Biology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 40, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{02f7fb387b87447583a370de49e3a8aa,
title = "Author Correction: The EphA2 receptor is activated through induction of distinct, ligand-dependent oligomeric structures (Communications Biology, (2018), 1, 1, (15), 10.1038/s42003-018-0017-7)",
abstract = "The original published version of the paper contained labelling errors in Figures 1 and 5. The x-axis of Figure 1e was incorrectly labelled as “Receptors . μm2” instead of “Receptors . μm−2”. The figure key in Figure 5b incorrectly labelled the blue circles as “Wild-type” and the purple circles as “+m-ephrinA1”. The correct labels are blue: “Wild-type+m-ephrinA1” and purple: “Wild-type, no ligand.” The original version also contained a typesetting error in Table 1. The values in the second row, rightmost column, were not all set in bold text as required. The errors do not impact the conclusions in the main text of the paper. These errors have been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the paper.",
author = "Singh, {Deo R.} and Pranjali Kanvinde and Christopher King and Pasquale, {Elena B.} and Hristova, {Kalina A}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s42003-018-0044-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
journal = "Communications Biology",
issn = "2399-3642",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author Correction

T2 - The EphA2 receptor is activated through induction of distinct, ligand-dependent oligomeric structures (Communications Biology, (2018), 1, 1, (15), 10.1038/s42003-018-0017-7)

AU - Singh, Deo R.

AU - Kanvinde, Pranjali

AU - King, Christopher

AU - Pasquale, Elena B.

AU - Hristova, Kalina A

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - The original published version of the paper contained labelling errors in Figures 1 and 5. The x-axis of Figure 1e was incorrectly labelled as “Receptors . μm2” instead of “Receptors . μm−2”. The figure key in Figure 5b incorrectly labelled the blue circles as “Wild-type” and the purple circles as “+m-ephrinA1”. The correct labels are blue: “Wild-type+m-ephrinA1” and purple: “Wild-type, no ligand.” The original version also contained a typesetting error in Table 1. The values in the second row, rightmost column, were not all set in bold text as required. The errors do not impact the conclusions in the main text of the paper. These errors have been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the paper.

AB - The original published version of the paper contained labelling errors in Figures 1 and 5. The x-axis of Figure 1e was incorrectly labelled as “Receptors . μm2” instead of “Receptors . μm−2”. The figure key in Figure 5b incorrectly labelled the blue circles as “Wild-type” and the purple circles as “+m-ephrinA1”. The correct labels are blue: “Wild-type+m-ephrinA1” and purple: “Wild-type, no ligand.” The original version also contained a typesetting error in Table 1. The values in the second row, rightmost column, were not all set in bold text as required. The errors do not impact the conclusions in the main text of the paper. These errors have been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071009397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071009397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s42003-018-0044-4

DO - 10.1038/s42003-018-0044-4

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 30273417

AN - SCOPUS:85071009397

VL - 1

JO - Communications Biology

JF - Communications Biology

SN - 2399-3642

IS - 1

M1 - 40

ER -