Attitudes, psychology, and risk taking of potential live kidney donors: Strangers, relatives, and the general public

Leigh Boulware, Lloyd E. Ratner, Misty U. Troll, Alexis Chaudron, Edwina Yeung, Shirley Chen, Andrew S. Klein, Janet Hiller, Neil R. Powe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is unclear whether potential living kidney donors and the general public differ in attitudes and psychological characteristics. We performed a case-control study to explore differences in these groups using a standardized questionnaire (analyzed using conditional logistic regression). Strangers (N = 42) were more willing than controls (N = 126) to incur risks: 64% strangers versus 35% controls accepting >50% medical complications (MC) risk; 90% strangers versus 61% controls accepting >8 days hospitalization; 71% strangers versus 43% controls accepting >3 months unpaid; 55% strangers versus 16% controls accepting 100% kidney failure (KF) risk; 70% strangers versus 34% controls accepting ≤10% likelihood of successful transplant (all p <0.01). Relatives (N = 251) were also more willing than controls (N = 251) to incur risks. Strangers were most willing to incur MC, KF and transplant failure. Groups did not differ in attitudes, depression or anxiety. Potential stranger and related donors are willing to undergo greater risks with donation than the general public, but do not differ in other attitudes, depression or anxiety. This should help reassure transplant centers and the public that both forms of live donation do not necessarily involve increased ethical risks of donor coercion or irrational thought processes. Still, careful attention to communication of all risks of donation is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1671-1680
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume5
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005

Fingerprint

Risk-Taking
Tissue Donors
Psychology
Kidney
Transplants
Renal Insufficiency
Anxiety
Depression
Coercion
Living Donors
Case-Control Studies
Hospitalization
Logistic Models
Communication

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • General public attitudes
  • Live kidney donation
  • Related donation
  • Stranger donation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology

Cite this

Attitudes, psychology, and risk taking of potential live kidney donors : Strangers, relatives, and the general public. / Boulware, Leigh; Ratner, Lloyd E.; Troll, Misty U.; Chaudron, Alexis; Yeung, Edwina; Chen, Shirley; Klein, Andrew S.; Hiller, Janet; Powe, Neil R.

In: American Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 5, No. 7, 07.2005, p. 1671-1680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boulware, Leigh ; Ratner, Lloyd E. ; Troll, Misty U. ; Chaudron, Alexis ; Yeung, Edwina ; Chen, Shirley ; Klein, Andrew S. ; Hiller, Janet ; Powe, Neil R. / Attitudes, psychology, and risk taking of potential live kidney donors : Strangers, relatives, and the general public. In: American Journal of Transplantation. 2005 ; Vol. 5, No. 7. pp. 1671-1680.
@article{530c14f5863d4598b8badece0a3ddda6,
title = "Attitudes, psychology, and risk taking of potential live kidney donors: Strangers, relatives, and the general public",
abstract = "It is unclear whether potential living kidney donors and the general public differ in attitudes and psychological characteristics. We performed a case-control study to explore differences in these groups using a standardized questionnaire (analyzed using conditional logistic regression). Strangers (N = 42) were more willing than controls (N = 126) to incur risks: 64{\%} strangers versus 35{\%} controls accepting >50{\%} medical complications (MC) risk; 90{\%} strangers versus 61{\%} controls accepting >8 days hospitalization; 71{\%} strangers versus 43{\%} controls accepting >3 months unpaid; 55{\%} strangers versus 16{\%} controls accepting 100{\%} kidney failure (KF) risk; 70{\%} strangers versus 34{\%} controls accepting ≤10{\%} likelihood of successful transplant (all p <0.01). Relatives (N = 251) were also more willing than controls (N = 251) to incur risks. Strangers were most willing to incur MC, KF and transplant failure. Groups did not differ in attitudes, depression or anxiety. Potential stranger and related donors are willing to undergo greater risks with donation than the general public, but do not differ in other attitudes, depression or anxiety. This should help reassure transplant centers and the public that both forms of live donation do not necessarily involve increased ethical risks of donor coercion or irrational thought processes. Still, careful attention to communication of all risks of donation is warranted.",
keywords = "Anxiety, Depression, General public attitudes, Live kidney donation, Related donation, Stranger donation",
author = "Leigh Boulware and Ratner, {Lloyd E.} and Troll, {Misty U.} and Alexis Chaudron and Edwina Yeung and Shirley Chen and Klein, {Andrew S.} and Janet Hiller and Powe, {Neil R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00896.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "1671--1680",
journal = "American Journal of Transplantation",
issn = "1600-6135",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes, psychology, and risk taking of potential live kidney donors

T2 - Strangers, relatives, and the general public

AU - Boulware, Leigh

AU - Ratner, Lloyd E.

AU - Troll, Misty U.

AU - Chaudron, Alexis

AU - Yeung, Edwina

AU - Chen, Shirley

AU - Klein, Andrew S.

AU - Hiller, Janet

AU - Powe, Neil R.

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - It is unclear whether potential living kidney donors and the general public differ in attitudes and psychological characteristics. We performed a case-control study to explore differences in these groups using a standardized questionnaire (analyzed using conditional logistic regression). Strangers (N = 42) were more willing than controls (N = 126) to incur risks: 64% strangers versus 35% controls accepting >50% medical complications (MC) risk; 90% strangers versus 61% controls accepting >8 days hospitalization; 71% strangers versus 43% controls accepting >3 months unpaid; 55% strangers versus 16% controls accepting 100% kidney failure (KF) risk; 70% strangers versus 34% controls accepting ≤10% likelihood of successful transplant (all p <0.01). Relatives (N = 251) were also more willing than controls (N = 251) to incur risks. Strangers were most willing to incur MC, KF and transplant failure. Groups did not differ in attitudes, depression or anxiety. Potential stranger and related donors are willing to undergo greater risks with donation than the general public, but do not differ in other attitudes, depression or anxiety. This should help reassure transplant centers and the public that both forms of live donation do not necessarily involve increased ethical risks of donor coercion or irrational thought processes. Still, careful attention to communication of all risks of donation is warranted.

AB - It is unclear whether potential living kidney donors and the general public differ in attitudes and psychological characteristics. We performed a case-control study to explore differences in these groups using a standardized questionnaire (analyzed using conditional logistic regression). Strangers (N = 42) were more willing than controls (N = 126) to incur risks: 64% strangers versus 35% controls accepting >50% medical complications (MC) risk; 90% strangers versus 61% controls accepting >8 days hospitalization; 71% strangers versus 43% controls accepting >3 months unpaid; 55% strangers versus 16% controls accepting 100% kidney failure (KF) risk; 70% strangers versus 34% controls accepting ≤10% likelihood of successful transplant (all p <0.01). Relatives (N = 251) were also more willing than controls (N = 251) to incur risks. Strangers were most willing to incur MC, KF and transplant failure. Groups did not differ in attitudes, depression or anxiety. Potential stranger and related donors are willing to undergo greater risks with donation than the general public, but do not differ in other attitudes, depression or anxiety. This should help reassure transplant centers and the public that both forms of live donation do not necessarily involve increased ethical risks of donor coercion or irrational thought processes. Still, careful attention to communication of all risks of donation is warranted.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Depression

KW - General public attitudes

KW - Live kidney donation

KW - Related donation

KW - Stranger donation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344459066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344459066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00896.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00896.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15943625

AN - SCOPUS:21344459066

VL - 5

SP - 1671

EP - 1680

JO - American Journal of Transplantation

JF - American Journal of Transplantation

SN - 1600-6135

IS - 7

ER -