Attitudes of processors and distributors towards processing in the natural foods industry

Sudha Raj, Kate Clancy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the last twenty years products bearing the term ‘natural’ have proliferated in the marketplace. Major food companies have made ‘natural’ claims often with a disclaimer that ‘no artificial preservatives or other such additives have been added’. In the 1970s, the Federal Trade Commission staff developed a two pronged standard encompassing the use of additives and ‘minimal processing’; it was not adopted and there is still no federal standard for the term. However, terms such as ‘natural’ and ‘minimal processing’ continue to be used to describe foods that, contrary to consumers’ expectations and the earlier proposal, are produced with complex processing technologies. As part of the federal legislative mandate to develop standards for production of organic foods, processing standards are also being proposed. It appears that groups developing these standards are not considering the inclusion of a ‘minimal processing’ prong, although there may be a need for this later. In this paper we have studied the attitudes and perceptions of professionals in the natural foods industry regarding the categorization of unit operations based on their level of acceptability for the production of foods containing organic ingredients. We conclude that such a categorization could be used as a basis for developing industry-specific processing guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-226
Number of pages18
JournalBiological Agriculture and Horticulture
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

natural foods
food industry
organic foods
preservatives
processing technology
food processing
food production
ingredients
markets
industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Horticulture

Cite this

Attitudes of processors and distributors towards processing in the natural foods industry. / Raj, Sudha; Clancy, Kate.

In: Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1995, p. 209-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e7fac57a1b54fdf870754803058424d,
title = "Attitudes of processors and distributors towards processing in the natural foods industry",
abstract = "In the last twenty years products bearing the term ‘natural’ have proliferated in the marketplace. Major food companies have made ‘natural’ claims often with a disclaimer that ‘no artificial preservatives or other such additives have been added’. In the 1970s, the Federal Trade Commission staff developed a two pronged standard encompassing the use of additives and ‘minimal processing’; it was not adopted and there is still no federal standard for the term. However, terms such as ‘natural’ and ‘minimal processing’ continue to be used to describe foods that, contrary to consumers’ expectations and the earlier proposal, are produced with complex processing technologies. As part of the federal legislative mandate to develop standards for production of organic foods, processing standards are also being proposed. It appears that groups developing these standards are not considering the inclusion of a ‘minimal processing’ prong, although there may be a need for this later. In this paper we have studied the attitudes and perceptions of professionals in the natural foods industry regarding the categorization of unit operations based on their level of acceptability for the production of foods containing organic ingredients. We conclude that such a categorization could be used as a basis for developing industry-specific processing guidelines.",
author = "Sudha Raj and Kate Clancy",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1080/01448765.1995.9754742",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "209--226",
journal = "Biological Agriculture and Horticulture",
issn = "0144-8765",
publisher = "A B Academic Publishers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes of processors and distributors towards processing in the natural foods industry

AU - Raj, Sudha

AU - Clancy, Kate

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - In the last twenty years products bearing the term ‘natural’ have proliferated in the marketplace. Major food companies have made ‘natural’ claims often with a disclaimer that ‘no artificial preservatives or other such additives have been added’. In the 1970s, the Federal Trade Commission staff developed a two pronged standard encompassing the use of additives and ‘minimal processing’; it was not adopted and there is still no federal standard for the term. However, terms such as ‘natural’ and ‘minimal processing’ continue to be used to describe foods that, contrary to consumers’ expectations and the earlier proposal, are produced with complex processing technologies. As part of the federal legislative mandate to develop standards for production of organic foods, processing standards are also being proposed. It appears that groups developing these standards are not considering the inclusion of a ‘minimal processing’ prong, although there may be a need for this later. In this paper we have studied the attitudes and perceptions of professionals in the natural foods industry regarding the categorization of unit operations based on their level of acceptability for the production of foods containing organic ingredients. We conclude that such a categorization could be used as a basis for developing industry-specific processing guidelines.

AB - In the last twenty years products bearing the term ‘natural’ have proliferated in the marketplace. Major food companies have made ‘natural’ claims often with a disclaimer that ‘no artificial preservatives or other such additives have been added’. In the 1970s, the Federal Trade Commission staff developed a two pronged standard encompassing the use of additives and ‘minimal processing’; it was not adopted and there is still no federal standard for the term. However, terms such as ‘natural’ and ‘minimal processing’ continue to be used to describe foods that, contrary to consumers’ expectations and the earlier proposal, are produced with complex processing technologies. As part of the federal legislative mandate to develop standards for production of organic foods, processing standards are also being proposed. It appears that groups developing these standards are not considering the inclusion of a ‘minimal processing’ prong, although there may be a need for this later. In this paper we have studied the attitudes and perceptions of professionals in the natural foods industry regarding the categorization of unit operations based on their level of acceptability for the production of foods containing organic ingredients. We conclude that such a categorization could be used as a basis for developing industry-specific processing guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872879282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872879282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01448765.1995.9754742

DO - 10.1080/01448765.1995.9754742

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 209

EP - 226

JO - Biological Agriculture and Horticulture

JF - Biological Agriculture and Horticulture

SN - 0144-8765

IS - 3

ER -