Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction

Brian A. Anderson, Monica L. Faulkner, Jessica J. Rilee, Steven Yantis, Cherie Marvel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Attentional biases for drug-related stimuli play a prominent role in addiction, predicting treatment outcomes. Attentional biases also develop for stimuli that have been paired with nondrug rewards in adults without a history of addiction, the magnitude of which is predicted by visual working-memory capacity and impulsiveness. We tested the hypothesis that addiction is associated with an increased attentional bias for nondrug (monetary) reward relative to that of healthy controls, and that this bias is related to working-memory impairments and increased impulsiveness. Seventeen patients receiving methadone-maintenance treatment for opioid dependence and 17 healthy controls participated. Impulsiveness was measured using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11; Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995), visual working-memory capacity was measured as the ability to recognize briefly presented color stimuli, and attentional bias was measured as the magnitude of response time slowing caused by irrelevant but previously reward-associated distractors in a visual-search task. The results showed that attention was biased toward the distractors across all participants, replicating previous findings. It is important to note, this bias was significantly greater in the patients than in the controls and was negatively correlated with visual working-memory capacity. Patients were also significantly more impulsive than controls as a group. Our findings demonstrate that patients in treatment for addiction experience greater difficulty ignoring stimuli associated with nondrug reward. This nonspecific reward-related bias could mediate the distracting quality of drug-related stimuli previously observed in addiction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-506
Number of pages8
JournalExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Reward
Short-Term Memory
Aptitude
Methadone
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Opioid Analgesics
Reaction Time
Color
Attentional Bias
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Impulsiveness
  • Learning
  • Reward
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction. / Anderson, Brian A.; Faulkner, Monica L.; Rilee, Jessica J.; Yantis, Steven; Marvel, Cherie.

In: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Vol. 21, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 499-506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, Brian A. ; Faulkner, Monica L. ; Rilee, Jessica J. ; Yantis, Steven ; Marvel, Cherie. / Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction. In: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2013 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 499-506.
@article{3e5fc29b195f40b58706992503e5bda6,
title = "Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction",
abstract = "Attentional biases for drug-related stimuli play a prominent role in addiction, predicting treatment outcomes. Attentional biases also develop for stimuli that have been paired with nondrug rewards in adults without a history of addiction, the magnitude of which is predicted by visual working-memory capacity and impulsiveness. We tested the hypothesis that addiction is associated with an increased attentional bias for nondrug (monetary) reward relative to that of healthy controls, and that this bias is related to working-memory impairments and increased impulsiveness. Seventeen patients receiving methadone-maintenance treatment for opioid dependence and 17 healthy controls participated. Impulsiveness was measured using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11; Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995), visual working-memory capacity was measured as the ability to recognize briefly presented color stimuli, and attentional bias was measured as the magnitude of response time slowing caused by irrelevant but previously reward-associated distractors in a visual-search task. The results showed that attention was biased toward the distractors across all participants, replicating previous findings. It is important to note, this bias was significantly greater in the patients than in the controls and was negatively correlated with visual working-memory capacity. Patients were also significantly more impulsive than controls as a group. Our findings demonstrate that patients in treatment for addiction experience greater difficulty ignoring stimuli associated with nondrug reward. This nonspecific reward-related bias could mediate the distracting quality of drug-related stimuli previously observed in addiction.",
keywords = "Attention, Impulsiveness, Learning, Reward, Working memory",
author = "Anderson, {Brian A.} and Faulkner, {Monica L.} and Rilee, {Jessica J.} and Steven Yantis and Cherie Marvel",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/a0034575",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "499--506",
journal = "Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology",
issn = "1064-1297",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction

AU - Anderson, Brian A.

AU - Faulkner, Monica L.

AU - Rilee, Jessica J.

AU - Yantis, Steven

AU - Marvel, Cherie

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Attentional biases for drug-related stimuli play a prominent role in addiction, predicting treatment outcomes. Attentional biases also develop for stimuli that have been paired with nondrug rewards in adults without a history of addiction, the magnitude of which is predicted by visual working-memory capacity and impulsiveness. We tested the hypothesis that addiction is associated with an increased attentional bias for nondrug (monetary) reward relative to that of healthy controls, and that this bias is related to working-memory impairments and increased impulsiveness. Seventeen patients receiving methadone-maintenance treatment for opioid dependence and 17 healthy controls participated. Impulsiveness was measured using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11; Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995), visual working-memory capacity was measured as the ability to recognize briefly presented color stimuli, and attentional bias was measured as the magnitude of response time slowing caused by irrelevant but previously reward-associated distractors in a visual-search task. The results showed that attention was biased toward the distractors across all participants, replicating previous findings. It is important to note, this bias was significantly greater in the patients than in the controls and was negatively correlated with visual working-memory capacity. Patients were also significantly more impulsive than controls as a group. Our findings demonstrate that patients in treatment for addiction experience greater difficulty ignoring stimuli associated with nondrug reward. This nonspecific reward-related bias could mediate the distracting quality of drug-related stimuli previously observed in addiction.

AB - Attentional biases for drug-related stimuli play a prominent role in addiction, predicting treatment outcomes. Attentional biases also develop for stimuli that have been paired with nondrug rewards in adults without a history of addiction, the magnitude of which is predicted by visual working-memory capacity and impulsiveness. We tested the hypothesis that addiction is associated with an increased attentional bias for nondrug (monetary) reward relative to that of healthy controls, and that this bias is related to working-memory impairments and increased impulsiveness. Seventeen patients receiving methadone-maintenance treatment for opioid dependence and 17 healthy controls participated. Impulsiveness was measured using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11; Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995), visual working-memory capacity was measured as the ability to recognize briefly presented color stimuli, and attentional bias was measured as the magnitude of response time slowing caused by irrelevant but previously reward-associated distractors in a visual-search task. The results showed that attention was biased toward the distractors across all participants, replicating previous findings. It is important to note, this bias was significantly greater in the patients than in the controls and was negatively correlated with visual working-memory capacity. Patients were also significantly more impulsive than controls as a group. Our findings demonstrate that patients in treatment for addiction experience greater difficulty ignoring stimuli associated with nondrug reward. This nonspecific reward-related bias could mediate the distracting quality of drug-related stimuli previously observed in addiction.

KW - Attention

KW - Impulsiveness

KW - Learning

KW - Reward

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890977674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890977674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0034575

DO - 10.1037/a0034575

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 499

EP - 506

JO - Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

JF - Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

SN - 1064-1297

IS - 6

ER -