At the intersection of chronic disease, disability and health services research: A scoping literature review

Stephen P. Gulley, Elizabeth K. Rasch, Christina Bethell, Adam C. Carle, Benjamin G. Druss, Amy J. Houtrow, Amanda Reichard, Leighton Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There is a concerted effort underway to evaluate and reform our nation's approach to the health of people with ongoing or elevated needs for care, particularly persons with chronic conditions and/or disabilities. Objective: This literature review characterizes the current state of knowledge on the measurement of chronic disease and disability in population-based health services research on working age adults (age 18-64). Methods: Scoping review methods were used to scan the health services research literature published since the year 2000, including medline, psycINFO and manual searches. The guiding question was: "How are chronic conditions and disability defined and measured in studies of healthcare access, quality, utilization or cost?". . Results: Fifty-five studies met the stated inclusion criteria. Chronic conditions were variously defined by brief lists of conditions, broader criteria-based lists, two or more (multiple) chronic conditions, or other constructs. Disability was generally assessed through ADLs/IADLs, functional limitations, activity limitations or program eligibility. A smaller subset of studies used information from both domains to identify a study population or to stratify it by subgroup. Conclusions: There remains a divide in this literature between studies that rely upon diagnostically-oriented measures and studies that instead rely on functional, activity or other constructs of disability to identify the population of interest. This leads to wide ranging differences in population prevalence and outcome estimates. However, there is also a growing effort to develop methods that account for the overlap between chronic disease and disability and to "segment" this heterogeneous population into policy or practice relevant subgroups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDisability and Health Journal
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Health Services Research
Chronic Disease
Population
Quality of Health Care
Public Policy
Activities of Daily Living
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • Chronic conditions
  • Health service utilization
  • Measurement
  • People with disabilities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

At the intersection of chronic disease, disability and health services research : A scoping literature review. / Gulley, Stephen P.; Rasch, Elizabeth K.; Bethell, Christina; Carle, Adam C.; Druss, Benjamin G.; Houtrow, Amy J.; Reichard, Amanda; Chan, Leighton.

In: Disability and Health Journal, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gulley, Stephen P. ; Rasch, Elizabeth K. ; Bethell, Christina ; Carle, Adam C. ; Druss, Benjamin G. ; Houtrow, Amy J. ; Reichard, Amanda ; Chan, Leighton. / At the intersection of chronic disease, disability and health services research : A scoping literature review. In: Disability and Health Journal. 2018.
@article{d19b503d083b4979be95dce1cde5fd1e,
title = "At the intersection of chronic disease, disability and health services research: A scoping literature review",
abstract = "Background: There is a concerted effort underway to evaluate and reform our nation's approach to the health of people with ongoing or elevated needs for care, particularly persons with chronic conditions and/or disabilities. Objective: This literature review characterizes the current state of knowledge on the measurement of chronic disease and disability in population-based health services research on working age adults (age 18-64). Methods: Scoping review methods were used to scan the health services research literature published since the year 2000, including medline, psycINFO and manual searches. The guiding question was: {"}How are chronic conditions and disability defined and measured in studies of healthcare access, quality, utilization or cost?{"}. . Results: Fifty-five studies met the stated inclusion criteria. Chronic conditions were variously defined by brief lists of conditions, broader criteria-based lists, two or more (multiple) chronic conditions, or other constructs. Disability was generally assessed through ADLs/IADLs, functional limitations, activity limitations or program eligibility. A smaller subset of studies used information from both domains to identify a study population or to stratify it by subgroup. Conclusions: There remains a divide in this literature between studies that rely upon diagnostically-oriented measures and studies that instead rely on functional, activity or other constructs of disability to identify the population of interest. This leads to wide ranging differences in population prevalence and outcome estimates. However, there is also a growing effort to develop methods that account for the overlap between chronic disease and disability and to {"}segment{"} this heterogeneous population into policy or practice relevant subgroups.",
keywords = "Chronic conditions, Health service utilization, Measurement, People with disabilities",
author = "Gulley, {Stephen P.} and Rasch, {Elizabeth K.} and Christina Bethell and Carle, {Adam C.} and Druss, {Benjamin G.} and Houtrow, {Amy J.} and Amanda Reichard and Leighton Chan",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.012",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Disability and Health Journal",
issn = "1936-6574",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - At the intersection of chronic disease, disability and health services research

T2 - A scoping literature review

AU - Gulley, Stephen P.

AU - Rasch, Elizabeth K.

AU - Bethell, Christina

AU - Carle, Adam C.

AU - Druss, Benjamin G.

AU - Houtrow, Amy J.

AU - Reichard, Amanda

AU - Chan, Leighton

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: There is a concerted effort underway to evaluate and reform our nation's approach to the health of people with ongoing or elevated needs for care, particularly persons with chronic conditions and/or disabilities. Objective: This literature review characterizes the current state of knowledge on the measurement of chronic disease and disability in population-based health services research on working age adults (age 18-64). Methods: Scoping review methods were used to scan the health services research literature published since the year 2000, including medline, psycINFO and manual searches. The guiding question was: "How are chronic conditions and disability defined and measured in studies of healthcare access, quality, utilization or cost?". . Results: Fifty-five studies met the stated inclusion criteria. Chronic conditions were variously defined by brief lists of conditions, broader criteria-based lists, two or more (multiple) chronic conditions, or other constructs. Disability was generally assessed through ADLs/IADLs, functional limitations, activity limitations or program eligibility. A smaller subset of studies used information from both domains to identify a study population or to stratify it by subgroup. Conclusions: There remains a divide in this literature between studies that rely upon diagnostically-oriented measures and studies that instead rely on functional, activity or other constructs of disability to identify the population of interest. This leads to wide ranging differences in population prevalence and outcome estimates. However, there is also a growing effort to develop methods that account for the overlap between chronic disease and disability and to "segment" this heterogeneous population into policy or practice relevant subgroups.

AB - Background: There is a concerted effort underway to evaluate and reform our nation's approach to the health of people with ongoing or elevated needs for care, particularly persons with chronic conditions and/or disabilities. Objective: This literature review characterizes the current state of knowledge on the measurement of chronic disease and disability in population-based health services research on working age adults (age 18-64). Methods: Scoping review methods were used to scan the health services research literature published since the year 2000, including medline, psycINFO and manual searches. The guiding question was: "How are chronic conditions and disability defined and measured in studies of healthcare access, quality, utilization or cost?". . Results: Fifty-five studies met the stated inclusion criteria. Chronic conditions were variously defined by brief lists of conditions, broader criteria-based lists, two or more (multiple) chronic conditions, or other constructs. Disability was generally assessed through ADLs/IADLs, functional limitations, activity limitations or program eligibility. A smaller subset of studies used information from both domains to identify a study population or to stratify it by subgroup. Conclusions: There remains a divide in this literature between studies that rely upon diagnostically-oriented measures and studies that instead rely on functional, activity or other constructs of disability to identify the population of interest. This leads to wide ranging differences in population prevalence and outcome estimates. However, there is also a growing effort to develop methods that account for the overlap between chronic disease and disability and to "segment" this heterogeneous population into policy or practice relevant subgroups.

KW - Chronic conditions

KW - Health service utilization

KW - Measurement

KW - People with disabilities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040776856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040776856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 29396271

AN - SCOPUS:85040776856

JO - Disability and Health Journal

JF - Disability and Health Journal

SN - 1936-6574

ER -