Asymmetries in social touch—motor and emotional biases on lateral preferences in embracing, cradling and kissing

Julian Packheiser, Judith Schmitz, Dorothea Metzen, Petunia Reinke, Fiona Radtke, Patrick Friedrich, Onur Güntürkün, Jutta Peterburs, Sebastian Ocklenburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


In human social interaction, affective touch plays an integral role to communicate intentions and emotions. Three of the most important forms of social touch are embracing, cradling and kissing. These behaviours have been demonstrated to be lateralized, but the underlying mechanisms are still not well understood. Both motor and emotive biases have been suggested to affect laterality of social touch. We aimed to systematically investigate how motor preferences and emotive biases influence the lateralization of embracing, cradling and kissing within the same sample. Participants performed all three forms of social touch in neutral, positive and negative emotional conditions. Like a previous study, we found a rightward bias for embracing that was modulated by both motor preferences and the emotional content of the situation. Kissing and cradling were not influenced by motor preferences. In general, a negative emotional connotation of the situation led to a reduction of lateral biases in social touch, independent of the individual direction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-348
Number of pages24
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 3 2020
Externally publishedYes


  • Social neuroscience
  • affective touch
  • emotion
  • lateralization
  • social touch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Asymmetries in social touch—motor and emotional biases on lateral preferences in embracing, cradling and kissing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this