Associations Between In-Hospital Mortality, Health Care Utilization, and Inpatient Costs With the 2011 Resident Duty Hour Revision

Shaker M. Eid, Lucia Ponor, Darcy A. Reed, May A. Beydoun, Hind A. Beydoun, Scott Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has mandated revisions to residents' work hours to improve patient safety and enhance resident education and wellness. The impact on clinical outcomes on a national level is poorly understood. Objective: We examined data from before and after the ACGME 2011 duty hour revision and looked for differences between teaching and nonteaching US hospitals. Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients admitted to hospitals in the 2-year periods before and after the 2011 duty hour revision was conducted, utilizing a nationally representative data set. We compared patient and hospital characteristics using standardized differences. With nonteaching hospitals serving as the control group, we used multiple group interrupted time series segmented regression analysis to test for postrevision level and trend changes in mortality, length of stay (LOS), and costs. Results: We examined more than 117 million hospitalizations. At teaching and nonteaching hospitals, trends in mortality and LOS in prerevision and postrevision periods were not significantly different (all P > .05). A significant monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization was noted postrevision at teaching hospitals (P = .019) but not at nonteaching hospitals (P = .62). In the 2 years following the 2011 revision, there was a monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization (-$52.28; 95% confidence interval -$116.90 to -$12.32; P = .026) at teaching relative to nonteaching hospitals. Conclusions: There were no differences in mortality or LOS between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. However, there was a small decrease in cost per hospitalization at teaching hospitals following the 2011 revision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-155
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of graduate medical education
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Hospital Mortality
Inpatients
Costs and Cost Analysis
Teaching Hospitals
Hospitalization
Graduate Medical Education
Length of Stay
Accreditation
Mortality
Teaching
Patient Safety
Observational Studies
Retrospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Confidence Intervals
Education
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Associations Between In-Hospital Mortality, Health Care Utilization, and Inpatient Costs With the 2011 Resident Duty Hour Revision. / Eid, Shaker M.; Ponor, Lucia; Reed, Darcy A.; Beydoun, May A.; Beydoun, Hind A.; Wright, Scott.

In: Journal of graduate medical education, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 146-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{081e5f25d0144775a2d00adb880e7da4,
title = "Associations Between In-Hospital Mortality, Health Care Utilization, and Inpatient Costs With the 2011 Resident Duty Hour Revision",
abstract = "Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has mandated revisions to residents' work hours to improve patient safety and enhance resident education and wellness. The impact on clinical outcomes on a national level is poorly understood. Objective: We examined data from before and after the ACGME 2011 duty hour revision and looked for differences between teaching and nonteaching US hospitals. Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients admitted to hospitals in the 2-year periods before and after the 2011 duty hour revision was conducted, utilizing a nationally representative data set. We compared patient and hospital characteristics using standardized differences. With nonteaching hospitals serving as the control group, we used multiple group interrupted time series segmented regression analysis to test for postrevision level and trend changes in mortality, length of stay (LOS), and costs. Results: We examined more than 117 million hospitalizations. At teaching and nonteaching hospitals, trends in mortality and LOS in prerevision and postrevision periods were not significantly different (all P > .05). A significant monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization was noted postrevision at teaching hospitals (P = .019) but not at nonteaching hospitals (P = .62). In the 2 years following the 2011 revision, there was a monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization (-$52.28; 95{\%} confidence interval -$116.90 to -$12.32; P = .026) at teaching relative to nonteaching hospitals. Conclusions: There were no differences in mortality or LOS between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. However, there was a small decrease in cost per hospitalization at teaching hospitals following the 2011 revision.",
author = "Eid, {Shaker M.} and Lucia Ponor and Reed, {Darcy A.} and Beydoun, {May A.} and Beydoun, {Hind A.} and Scott Wright",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4300/JGME-D-18-00415.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "146--155",
journal = "Journal of graduate medical education",
issn = "1949-8349",
publisher = "University of Finance and Management",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Associations Between In-Hospital Mortality, Health Care Utilization, and Inpatient Costs With the 2011 Resident Duty Hour Revision

AU - Eid, Shaker M.

AU - Ponor, Lucia

AU - Reed, Darcy A.

AU - Beydoun, May A.

AU - Beydoun, Hind A.

AU - Wright, Scott

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has mandated revisions to residents' work hours to improve patient safety and enhance resident education and wellness. The impact on clinical outcomes on a national level is poorly understood. Objective: We examined data from before and after the ACGME 2011 duty hour revision and looked for differences between teaching and nonteaching US hospitals. Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients admitted to hospitals in the 2-year periods before and after the 2011 duty hour revision was conducted, utilizing a nationally representative data set. We compared patient and hospital characteristics using standardized differences. With nonteaching hospitals serving as the control group, we used multiple group interrupted time series segmented regression analysis to test for postrevision level and trend changes in mortality, length of stay (LOS), and costs. Results: We examined more than 117 million hospitalizations. At teaching and nonteaching hospitals, trends in mortality and LOS in prerevision and postrevision periods were not significantly different (all P > .05). A significant monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization was noted postrevision at teaching hospitals (P = .019) but not at nonteaching hospitals (P = .62). In the 2 years following the 2011 revision, there was a monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization (-$52.28; 95% confidence interval -$116.90 to -$12.32; P = .026) at teaching relative to nonteaching hospitals. Conclusions: There were no differences in mortality or LOS between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. However, there was a small decrease in cost per hospitalization at teaching hospitals following the 2011 revision.

AB - Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has mandated revisions to residents' work hours to improve patient safety and enhance resident education and wellness. The impact on clinical outcomes on a national level is poorly understood. Objective: We examined data from before and after the ACGME 2011 duty hour revision and looked for differences between teaching and nonteaching US hospitals. Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients admitted to hospitals in the 2-year periods before and after the 2011 duty hour revision was conducted, utilizing a nationally representative data set. We compared patient and hospital characteristics using standardized differences. With nonteaching hospitals serving as the control group, we used multiple group interrupted time series segmented regression analysis to test for postrevision level and trend changes in mortality, length of stay (LOS), and costs. Results: We examined more than 117 million hospitalizations. At teaching and nonteaching hospitals, trends in mortality and LOS in prerevision and postrevision periods were not significantly different (all P > .05). A significant monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization was noted postrevision at teaching hospitals (P = .019) but not at nonteaching hospitals (P = .62). In the 2 years following the 2011 revision, there was a monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization (-$52.28; 95% confidence interval -$116.90 to -$12.32; P = .026) at teaching relative to nonteaching hospitals. Conclusions: There were no differences in mortality or LOS between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. However, there was a small decrease in cost per hospitalization at teaching hospitals following the 2011 revision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065403348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065403348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00415.1

DO - 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00415.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 31024645

AN - SCOPUS:85065403348

VL - 11

SP - 146

EP - 155

JO - Journal of graduate medical education

JF - Journal of graduate medical education

SN - 1949-8349

IS - 2

ER -