TY - JOUR
T1 - Associations between BMI and home, school and route environmental exposures estimated using GPS and GIS
T2 - Do we see evidence of selective daily mobility bias in children?
AU - Burgoine, Thomas
AU - Jones, Andy P.
AU - Namenek Brouwer, Rebecca J.
AU - Benjamin Neelon, Sara E.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all volunteers who participated in the NC on the Move study. This work was undertaken by the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Funding from the British Heart Foundation, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research and the Wellcome Trust under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged. This study was supported, in part, by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Active Living Research.
Publisher Copyright:
© Burgoine et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
PY - 2015/2/6
Y1 - 2015/2/6
N2 - Background: This study examined whether objective measures of food, physical activity and built environment exposures, in home and non-home settings, contribute to children's body weight. Further, comparing GPS and GIS measures of environmental exposures along routes to and from school, we tested for evidence of selective daily mobility bias when using GPS data. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional analysis, using objective assessments of body weight in relation to multiple environmental exposures. Data presented are from a sample of 94 school-aged children, aged 5-11 years. Children's heights and weights were measured by trained researchers, and used to calculate BMI z-scores. Participants wore a GPS device for one full week. Environmental exposures were estimated within home and school neighbourhoods, and along GIS (modelled) and GPS (actual) routes from home to school. We directly compared associations between BMI and GIS-modelled versus GPS-derived environmental exposures. The study was conducted in Mebane and Mount Airy, North Carolina, USA, in 2011. Results: In adjusted regression models, greater school walkability was associated with significantly lower mean BMI. Greater home walkability was associated with increased BMI, as was greater school access to green space. Adjusted associations between BMI and route exposure characteristics were null. The use of GPS-actual route exposures did not appear to confound associations between environmental exposures and BMI in this sample. Conclusions: This study found few associations between environmental exposures in home, school and commuting domains and body weight in children. However, walkability of the school neighbourhood may be important. Of the other significant associations observed, some were in unexpected directions. Importantly, we found no evidence of selective daily mobility bias in this sample, although our study design is in need of replication in a free-living adult sample.
AB - Background: This study examined whether objective measures of food, physical activity and built environment exposures, in home and non-home settings, contribute to children's body weight. Further, comparing GPS and GIS measures of environmental exposures along routes to and from school, we tested for evidence of selective daily mobility bias when using GPS data. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional analysis, using objective assessments of body weight in relation to multiple environmental exposures. Data presented are from a sample of 94 school-aged children, aged 5-11 years. Children's heights and weights were measured by trained researchers, and used to calculate BMI z-scores. Participants wore a GPS device for one full week. Environmental exposures were estimated within home and school neighbourhoods, and along GIS (modelled) and GPS (actual) routes from home to school. We directly compared associations between BMI and GIS-modelled versus GPS-derived environmental exposures. The study was conducted in Mebane and Mount Airy, North Carolina, USA, in 2011. Results: In adjusted regression models, greater school walkability was associated with significantly lower mean BMI. Greater home walkability was associated with increased BMI, as was greater school access to green space. Adjusted associations between BMI and route exposure characteristics were null. The use of GPS-actual route exposures did not appear to confound associations between environmental exposures and BMI in this sample. Conclusions: This study found few associations between environmental exposures in home, school and commuting domains and body weight in children. However, walkability of the school neighbourhood may be important. Of the other significant associations observed, some were in unexpected directions. Importantly, we found no evidence of selective daily mobility bias in this sample, although our study design is in need of replication in a free-living adult sample.
KW - Activity space
KW - Body mass index (BMI)
KW - Environmental exposure
KW - Geographic information systems (GIS)
KW - Global positioning systems (GPS)
KW - Selective daily mobility bias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929330838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929330838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1476-072X-14-8
DO - 10.1186/1476-072X-14-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 25656299
AN - SCOPUS:84929330838
SN - 1476-072X
VL - 14
JO - International Journal of Health Geographics
JF - International Journal of Health Geographics
IS - 1
M1 - 8
ER -