Association of vision loss andwork status in the united states

Cheryl E. Sherrod, Susan Vitale, Kevin D. Frick, Pradeep Y. Ramulu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

IMPORTANCE :Working is critical to personal health and well-being.We examine the association of vision measured objectively with work status using a nationally representative sample of working-age Americans.

OBSERVATION: A total of 19 849 participants from the 1999-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey completed a vision examination and employment/ demographic questionnaires. Employment rates for men with visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and normal vision were 58.7%, 66.5%, and 76.2%, respectively; employment rates for women with visual impairment, uncorrected refractive error, and normal vision were 24.5%, 56.0%, and 62.9%, respectively. In multivariable models adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and chronic disease status, both uncorrected refractive error (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95%CI, 1.15-1.60) and visual impairment (OR, 3.04; 95%CI, 1.93-4.79) were associated with a higher likelihood of not working. Subgroups in which visual impairment was associated with even higher odds of not working included women (OR, 4.9; 95%CI, 2.5-9.6), participants younger than 55 years (OR, 4.3; 95%CI, 2.9-6.5), and diabetic individuals (OR, 14.8; 95%CI, 5.8-37.3).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE :Decreased vision is associated with a significantly higher likelihood of not working. Visually impaired diabetic individuals, women, and those younger than 55 years have a particularly high risk of not working. Further investigation is warranted to understand barriers for employment in individuals with decreased vision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1239-1242
Number of pages4
JournalJAMA ophthalmology
Volume132
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of vision loss andwork status in the united states'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this