Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival

Robert P. Giugliano, Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, Carlos A. Camargo, Martin A Makary, Christopher J. O'Donnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: An unstable angina guideline was published in 1994 by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Bethesda, Md. However, the relationship between guideline-concordant care and patient outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine whether guideline-concordant care is associated with improved outcomes. Methods: The study sample consisted of 275 consecutive nonreferral patients hospitalized with primary unstable angina. One-year survival and survival free of myocardial infarction were compared between patients who received care concordant with 8 selected guideline recommendations and patients who received discordant care. Results: Care concordant with the 8 key guideline recommendations was associated with improved 1-year survival (95% vs 81%; log-rank P <.001) and survival free of myocardial infarction (91% vs 74%; P <.001), compared with guideline- discordant care. Patients in high-risk subgroups had the largest survival benefit associated with guideline-concordant care (aged ≥ 65 years, 91% vs 74% [P = .005]; heart failure at presentation, 91% vs 68% [P = .10]). Aspirin therapy was the single recommendation most strongly associated with improved 1-year survival (94% vs 78%; P = .002). Conclusions: Care as outlined in the unstable angina clinical practice guideline is associated with improved 1- year outcomes. Subgroups of patients at highest risk and recommendations firmly based on randomized clinical trial data were most strongly associated with better outcomes. These findings support the use of an evidence-based approach to guideline development and assessment of quality of care in patients with primary unstable angina.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1775-1780
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume160
Issue number12
StatePublished - Jun 26 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Unstable Angina
Guidelines
Survival
United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Myocardial Infarction
Quality of Health Care
Practice Guidelines
Aspirin
Patient Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
Heart Failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Giugliano, R. P., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Camargo, C. A., Makary, M. A., & O'Donnell, C. J. (2000). Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160(12), 1775-1780.

Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival. / Giugliano, Robert P.; Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.; Camargo, Carlos A.; Makary, Martin A; O'Donnell, Christopher J.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 160, No. 12, 26.06.2000, p. 1775-1780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giugliano, RP, Lloyd-Jones, DM, Camargo, CA, Makary, MA & O'Donnell, CJ 2000, 'Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival', Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 160, no. 12, pp. 1775-1780.
Giugliano RP, Lloyd-Jones DM, Camargo CA, Makary MA, O'Donnell CJ. Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2000 Jun 26;160(12):1775-1780.
Giugliano, Robert P. ; Lloyd-Jones, Donald M. ; Camargo, Carlos A. ; Makary, Martin A ; O'Donnell, Christopher J. / Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival. In: Archives of Internal Medicine. 2000 ; Vol. 160, No. 12. pp. 1775-1780.
@article{3ce6e870a98343008686303bc054f13d,
title = "Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival",
abstract = "Background: An unstable angina guideline was published in 1994 by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Bethesda, Md. However, the relationship between guideline-concordant care and patient outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine whether guideline-concordant care is associated with improved outcomes. Methods: The study sample consisted of 275 consecutive nonreferral patients hospitalized with primary unstable angina. One-year survival and survival free of myocardial infarction were compared between patients who received care concordant with 8 selected guideline recommendations and patients who received discordant care. Results: Care concordant with the 8 key guideline recommendations was associated with improved 1-year survival (95{\%} vs 81{\%}; log-rank P <.001) and survival free of myocardial infarction (91{\%} vs 74{\%}; P <.001), compared with guideline- discordant care. Patients in high-risk subgroups had the largest survival benefit associated with guideline-concordant care (aged ≥ 65 years, 91{\%} vs 74{\%} [P = .005]; heart failure at presentation, 91{\%} vs 68{\%} [P = .10]). Aspirin therapy was the single recommendation most strongly associated with improved 1-year survival (94{\%} vs 78{\%}; P = .002). Conclusions: Care as outlined in the unstable angina clinical practice guideline is associated with improved 1- year outcomes. Subgroups of patients at highest risk and recommendations firmly based on randomized clinical trial data were most strongly associated with better outcomes. These findings support the use of an evidence-based approach to guideline development and assessment of quality of care in patients with primary unstable angina.",
author = "Giugliano, {Robert P.} and Lloyd-Jones, {Donald M.} and Camargo, {Carlos A.} and Makary, {Martin A} and O'Donnell, {Christopher J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
day = "26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "160",
pages = "1775--1780",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival

AU - Giugliano, Robert P.

AU - Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.

AU - Camargo, Carlos A.

AU - Makary, Martin A

AU - O'Donnell, Christopher J.

PY - 2000/6/26

Y1 - 2000/6/26

N2 - Background: An unstable angina guideline was published in 1994 by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Bethesda, Md. However, the relationship between guideline-concordant care and patient outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine whether guideline-concordant care is associated with improved outcomes. Methods: The study sample consisted of 275 consecutive nonreferral patients hospitalized with primary unstable angina. One-year survival and survival free of myocardial infarction were compared between patients who received care concordant with 8 selected guideline recommendations and patients who received discordant care. Results: Care concordant with the 8 key guideline recommendations was associated with improved 1-year survival (95% vs 81%; log-rank P <.001) and survival free of myocardial infarction (91% vs 74%; P <.001), compared with guideline- discordant care. Patients in high-risk subgroups had the largest survival benefit associated with guideline-concordant care (aged ≥ 65 years, 91% vs 74% [P = .005]; heart failure at presentation, 91% vs 68% [P = .10]). Aspirin therapy was the single recommendation most strongly associated with improved 1-year survival (94% vs 78%; P = .002). Conclusions: Care as outlined in the unstable angina clinical practice guideline is associated with improved 1- year outcomes. Subgroups of patients at highest risk and recommendations firmly based on randomized clinical trial data were most strongly associated with better outcomes. These findings support the use of an evidence-based approach to guideline development and assessment of quality of care in patients with primary unstable angina.

AB - Background: An unstable angina guideline was published in 1994 by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Bethesda, Md. However, the relationship between guideline-concordant care and patient outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine whether guideline-concordant care is associated with improved outcomes. Methods: The study sample consisted of 275 consecutive nonreferral patients hospitalized with primary unstable angina. One-year survival and survival free of myocardial infarction were compared between patients who received care concordant with 8 selected guideline recommendations and patients who received discordant care. Results: Care concordant with the 8 key guideline recommendations was associated with improved 1-year survival (95% vs 81%; log-rank P <.001) and survival free of myocardial infarction (91% vs 74%; P <.001), compared with guideline- discordant care. Patients in high-risk subgroups had the largest survival benefit associated with guideline-concordant care (aged ≥ 65 years, 91% vs 74% [P = .005]; heart failure at presentation, 91% vs 68% [P = .10]). Aspirin therapy was the single recommendation most strongly associated with improved 1-year survival (94% vs 78%; P = .002). Conclusions: Care as outlined in the unstable angina clinical practice guideline is associated with improved 1- year outcomes. Subgroups of patients at highest risk and recommendations firmly based on randomized clinical trial data were most strongly associated with better outcomes. These findings support the use of an evidence-based approach to guideline development and assessment of quality of care in patients with primary unstable angina.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034717531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034717531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 160

SP - 1775

EP - 1780

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 12

ER -