Association of Magnet Status and Nurse Staffing with Improvements in Patient Experience with Hospital Care, 2008-2015

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the longitudinal association of hospital Magnet status (an indicator of nursing excellence) and nurse-staffing level with inpatient care experience. Objectives: To examine temporal trends in hospital performance on patient experience measured using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and the association of these trends with Magnet status and nurse-staffing level. Research Design: Longitudinal study of hospital-level data from the HCAHPS survey, the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the American Nurses Credentialing Center. Growth curve models were used for the analysis of longitudinal associations. Subjects: A total of 26,752 hospital-year observations from 3614 US hospitals that collected at least 3 years of HCAHPS data from patients discharged between 2008 and 2015. Measures: Dependent variables were 7 HCAHPS measures. Independent variables included linear and quadratic time terms, hospital Magnet status, and nurse-staffing level. Results: There were significant improvements (P<0.001) in all 7 HCAHPS measures, but the trends were nonlinear; the improvement rates have decreased over time. Magnet hospitals and hospitals with more favorable nurse staffing consistently performed better on HCAHPS but did not improve faster than other hospitals during the study period. In subgroup analyses, HCAHPS scores did not improve for hospitals after they received Magnet recognition during the period from 2009 to 2015. Conclusions: The hospital organizational attributes that lead to Magnet recognition or better nurse staffing may be associated with higher performance on HCAHPS. Magnet status and favorable nurse staffing may be markers of hospital commitment to better patient-centered care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-120
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Care
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Magnets
Nurses
Health Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
American Hospital Association
Credentialing
Patient-Centered Care

Keywords

  • growth curve model
  • HCAHPS
  • Magnet hospital
  • nurse staffing
  • patient experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Association of Magnet Status and Nurse Staffing with Improvements in Patient Experience with Hospital Care, 2008-2015. / Zhu, Junya; Dy, Sydney E; Wenzel, Jennifer; Wu, Albert W.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 56, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 111-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b70d8c230cd14ce88227baa1cd49cc55,
title = "Association of Magnet Status and Nurse Staffing with Improvements in Patient Experience with Hospital Care, 2008-2015",
abstract = "Background: Little is known about the longitudinal association of hospital Magnet status (an indicator of nursing excellence) and nurse-staffing level with inpatient care experience. Objectives: To examine temporal trends in hospital performance on patient experience measured using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and the association of these trends with Magnet status and nurse-staffing level. Research Design: Longitudinal study of hospital-level data from the HCAHPS survey, the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the American Nurses Credentialing Center. Growth curve models were used for the analysis of longitudinal associations. Subjects: A total of 26,752 hospital-year observations from 3614 US hospitals that collected at least 3 years of HCAHPS data from patients discharged between 2008 and 2015. Measures: Dependent variables were 7 HCAHPS measures. Independent variables included linear and quadratic time terms, hospital Magnet status, and nurse-staffing level. Results: There were significant improvements (P<0.001) in all 7 HCAHPS measures, but the trends were nonlinear; the improvement rates have decreased over time. Magnet hospitals and hospitals with more favorable nurse staffing consistently performed better on HCAHPS but did not improve faster than other hospitals during the study period. In subgroup analyses, HCAHPS scores did not improve for hospitals after they received Magnet recognition during the period from 2009 to 2015. Conclusions: The hospital organizational attributes that lead to Magnet recognition or better nurse staffing may be associated with higher performance on HCAHPS. Magnet status and favorable nurse staffing may be markers of hospital commitment to better patient-centered care.",
keywords = "growth curve model, HCAHPS, Magnet hospital, nurse staffing, patient experience",
author = "Junya Zhu and Dy, {Sydney E} and Jennifer Wenzel and Wu, {Albert W}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0000000000000854",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "111--120",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of Magnet Status and Nurse Staffing with Improvements in Patient Experience with Hospital Care, 2008-2015

AU - Zhu, Junya

AU - Dy, Sydney E

AU - Wenzel, Jennifer

AU - Wu, Albert W

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Little is known about the longitudinal association of hospital Magnet status (an indicator of nursing excellence) and nurse-staffing level with inpatient care experience. Objectives: To examine temporal trends in hospital performance on patient experience measured using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and the association of these trends with Magnet status and nurse-staffing level. Research Design: Longitudinal study of hospital-level data from the HCAHPS survey, the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the American Nurses Credentialing Center. Growth curve models were used for the analysis of longitudinal associations. Subjects: A total of 26,752 hospital-year observations from 3614 US hospitals that collected at least 3 years of HCAHPS data from patients discharged between 2008 and 2015. Measures: Dependent variables were 7 HCAHPS measures. Independent variables included linear and quadratic time terms, hospital Magnet status, and nurse-staffing level. Results: There were significant improvements (P<0.001) in all 7 HCAHPS measures, but the trends were nonlinear; the improvement rates have decreased over time. Magnet hospitals and hospitals with more favorable nurse staffing consistently performed better on HCAHPS but did not improve faster than other hospitals during the study period. In subgroup analyses, HCAHPS scores did not improve for hospitals after they received Magnet recognition during the period from 2009 to 2015. Conclusions: The hospital organizational attributes that lead to Magnet recognition or better nurse staffing may be associated with higher performance on HCAHPS. Magnet status and favorable nurse staffing may be markers of hospital commitment to better patient-centered care.

AB - Background: Little is known about the longitudinal association of hospital Magnet status (an indicator of nursing excellence) and nurse-staffing level with inpatient care experience. Objectives: To examine temporal trends in hospital performance on patient experience measured using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and the association of these trends with Magnet status and nurse-staffing level. Research Design: Longitudinal study of hospital-level data from the HCAHPS survey, the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the American Nurses Credentialing Center. Growth curve models were used for the analysis of longitudinal associations. Subjects: A total of 26,752 hospital-year observations from 3614 US hospitals that collected at least 3 years of HCAHPS data from patients discharged between 2008 and 2015. Measures: Dependent variables were 7 HCAHPS measures. Independent variables included linear and quadratic time terms, hospital Magnet status, and nurse-staffing level. Results: There were significant improvements (P<0.001) in all 7 HCAHPS measures, but the trends were nonlinear; the improvement rates have decreased over time. Magnet hospitals and hospitals with more favorable nurse staffing consistently performed better on HCAHPS but did not improve faster than other hospitals during the study period. In subgroup analyses, HCAHPS scores did not improve for hospitals after they received Magnet recognition during the period from 2009 to 2015. Conclusions: The hospital organizational attributes that lead to Magnet recognition or better nurse staffing may be associated with higher performance on HCAHPS. Magnet status and favorable nurse staffing may be markers of hospital commitment to better patient-centered care.

KW - growth curve model

KW - HCAHPS

KW - Magnet hospital

KW - nurse staffing

KW - patient experience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044234294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044234294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000854

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000854

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29271818

AN - SCOPUS:85044234294

VL - 56

SP - 111

EP - 120

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 2

ER -