Association of a bundled hospital-at-home and 30-day postacute transitional care program with clinical outcomes and patient experiences

Alex D. Federman, Tacara Soones, Linda V. DeCherrie, Bruce A Leff, Albert L. Siu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Hospital-at-home (HaH) care provides acute hospital-level care in a patient’s home as a substitute for traditional inpatient care. In September 2017, the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee recommended implementation of an alternative payment model for a new model of HaH that bundles the acute episode with 30 days of postacute transitional care. OBJECTIVE To report outcomes of this new payment model for HaH care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Case-control study of HaH care patients with a concurrent control group of hospital inpatients recruited from emergency departments (EDs) and residences in New York City from November 18, 2014, to August 31, 2017. HaH patients were 18 years or older with fee-for-service Medicare and acute medical illness requiring inpatient-level care. Control patients met HaH eligibility but refused participation or were seen in the ED when a HaH admission could not be initiated. EXPOSURES HaH care or inpatient care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were acute period length of stay (LOS), all-cause 30-day hospital readmissions and ED visits, admissions to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), referral to a certified home health care agency, and patient experiences with care. Analyses accounted for nonrandom selection using inverse probability weighting. RESULTS Among the 507 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 74.6 [15.7] years; 68.6% women), data were available on all patients 30 days postdischarge. HaH patients (n = 295) were older than controls (n = 212) and more likely to have a preacute functional impairment. HaH patients had shorter LOS (3.2 days vs 5.5 days; difference, −2.3 days; 95% CI, −1.8 to −2.7 days; weighted P < .001); lower rates of readmissions (8.6% [25] vs 15.6% [32]; difference, −7.0%; 95% CI, −12.9% to −1.1%; weighted P < .001), ED revisits (5.8% [17] vs 11.7% [24]; difference, −5.9%; 95% CI, −11.0% to −0.7%; weighted P < .001), and SNF admissions (1.7% [5] vs 10.4% [22]; difference, −8.7%; 95% CI, −13.0% to −4.3%; weighted P < .001); and were also more likely to rate their hospital care highly (68.8% [119] vs 45.3% [67]; difference, 23.5%; 95% CI, 12.9% to 34.1%; weighted P < .001). There were no differences in referrals to certified home health agencies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE HaH care bundled with a 30-day postacute transitional care episode was associated with better patient outcomes and ratings of care compared with inpatient hospitalization. This model warrants consideration for addition to Medicare’s current portfolio of shared savings programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1033-1041
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Internal Medicine
Volume178
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Subacute Care
Home Care Services
Inpatients
Hospital Emergency Service
Home Care Agencies
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Medicare
Transitional Care
Length of Stay
Referral and Consultation
Fee-for-Service Plans
Patient Readmission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Association of a bundled hospital-at-home and 30-day postacute transitional care program with clinical outcomes and patient experiences. / Federman, Alex D.; Soones, Tacara; DeCherrie, Linda V.; Leff, Bruce A; Siu, Albert L.

In: JAMA Internal Medicine, Vol. 178, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 1033-1041.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Federman, Alex D. ; Soones, Tacara ; DeCherrie, Linda V. ; Leff, Bruce A ; Siu, Albert L. / Association of a bundled hospital-at-home and 30-day postacute transitional care program with clinical outcomes and patient experiences. In: JAMA Internal Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 178, No. 8. pp. 1033-1041.
@article{745a046ecaf84c1b8e9cd2b62946e13c,
title = "Association of a bundled hospital-at-home and 30-day postacute transitional care program with clinical outcomes and patient experiences",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE Hospital-at-home (HaH) care provides acute hospital-level care in a patient’s home as a substitute for traditional inpatient care. In September 2017, the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee recommended implementation of an alternative payment model for a new model of HaH that bundles the acute episode with 30 days of postacute transitional care. OBJECTIVE To report outcomes of this new payment model for HaH care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Case-control study of HaH care patients with a concurrent control group of hospital inpatients recruited from emergency departments (EDs) and residences in New York City from November 18, 2014, to August 31, 2017. HaH patients were 18 years or older with fee-for-service Medicare and acute medical illness requiring inpatient-level care. Control patients met HaH eligibility but refused participation or were seen in the ED when a HaH admission could not be initiated. EXPOSURES HaH care or inpatient care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were acute period length of stay (LOS), all-cause 30-day hospital readmissions and ED visits, admissions to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), referral to a certified home health care agency, and patient experiences with care. Analyses accounted for nonrandom selection using inverse probability weighting. RESULTS Among the 507 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 74.6 [15.7] years; 68.6{\%} women), data were available on all patients 30 days postdischarge. HaH patients (n = 295) were older than controls (n = 212) and more likely to have a preacute functional impairment. HaH patients had shorter LOS (3.2 days vs 5.5 days; difference, −2.3 days; 95{\%} CI, −1.8 to −2.7 days; weighted P < .001); lower rates of readmissions (8.6{\%} [25] vs 15.6{\%} [32]; difference, −7.0{\%}; 95{\%} CI, −12.9{\%} to −1.1{\%}; weighted P < .001), ED revisits (5.8{\%} [17] vs 11.7{\%} [24]; difference, −5.9{\%}; 95{\%} CI, −11.0{\%} to −0.7{\%}; weighted P < .001), and SNF admissions (1.7{\%} [5] vs 10.4{\%} [22]; difference, −8.7{\%}; 95{\%} CI, −13.0{\%} to −4.3{\%}; weighted P < .001); and were also more likely to rate their hospital care highly (68.8{\%} [119] vs 45.3{\%} [67]; difference, 23.5{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 12.9{\%} to 34.1{\%}; weighted P < .001). There were no differences in referrals to certified home health agencies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE HaH care bundled with a 30-day postacute transitional care episode was associated with better patient outcomes and ratings of care compared with inpatient hospitalization. This model warrants consideration for addition to Medicare’s current portfolio of shared savings programs.",
author = "Federman, {Alex D.} and Tacara Soones and DeCherrie, {Linda V.} and Leff, {Bruce A} and Siu, {Albert L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2562",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "178",
pages = "1033--1041",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of a bundled hospital-at-home and 30-day postacute transitional care program with clinical outcomes and patient experiences

AU - Federman, Alex D.

AU - Soones, Tacara

AU - DeCherrie, Linda V.

AU - Leff, Bruce A

AU - Siu, Albert L.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE Hospital-at-home (HaH) care provides acute hospital-level care in a patient’s home as a substitute for traditional inpatient care. In September 2017, the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee recommended implementation of an alternative payment model for a new model of HaH that bundles the acute episode with 30 days of postacute transitional care. OBJECTIVE To report outcomes of this new payment model for HaH care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Case-control study of HaH care patients with a concurrent control group of hospital inpatients recruited from emergency departments (EDs) and residences in New York City from November 18, 2014, to August 31, 2017. HaH patients were 18 years or older with fee-for-service Medicare and acute medical illness requiring inpatient-level care. Control patients met HaH eligibility but refused participation or were seen in the ED when a HaH admission could not be initiated. EXPOSURES HaH care or inpatient care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were acute period length of stay (LOS), all-cause 30-day hospital readmissions and ED visits, admissions to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), referral to a certified home health care agency, and patient experiences with care. Analyses accounted for nonrandom selection using inverse probability weighting. RESULTS Among the 507 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 74.6 [15.7] years; 68.6% women), data were available on all patients 30 days postdischarge. HaH patients (n = 295) were older than controls (n = 212) and more likely to have a preacute functional impairment. HaH patients had shorter LOS (3.2 days vs 5.5 days; difference, −2.3 days; 95% CI, −1.8 to −2.7 days; weighted P < .001); lower rates of readmissions (8.6% [25] vs 15.6% [32]; difference, −7.0%; 95% CI, −12.9% to −1.1%; weighted P < .001), ED revisits (5.8% [17] vs 11.7% [24]; difference, −5.9%; 95% CI, −11.0% to −0.7%; weighted P < .001), and SNF admissions (1.7% [5] vs 10.4% [22]; difference, −8.7%; 95% CI, −13.0% to −4.3%; weighted P < .001); and were also more likely to rate their hospital care highly (68.8% [119] vs 45.3% [67]; difference, 23.5%; 95% CI, 12.9% to 34.1%; weighted P < .001). There were no differences in referrals to certified home health agencies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE HaH care bundled with a 30-day postacute transitional care episode was associated with better patient outcomes and ratings of care compared with inpatient hospitalization. This model warrants consideration for addition to Medicare’s current portfolio of shared savings programs.

AB - IMPORTANCE Hospital-at-home (HaH) care provides acute hospital-level care in a patient’s home as a substitute for traditional inpatient care. In September 2017, the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee recommended implementation of an alternative payment model for a new model of HaH that bundles the acute episode with 30 days of postacute transitional care. OBJECTIVE To report outcomes of this new payment model for HaH care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Case-control study of HaH care patients with a concurrent control group of hospital inpatients recruited from emergency departments (EDs) and residences in New York City from November 18, 2014, to August 31, 2017. HaH patients were 18 years or older with fee-for-service Medicare and acute medical illness requiring inpatient-level care. Control patients met HaH eligibility but refused participation or were seen in the ED when a HaH admission could not be initiated. EXPOSURES HaH care or inpatient care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were acute period length of stay (LOS), all-cause 30-day hospital readmissions and ED visits, admissions to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), referral to a certified home health care agency, and patient experiences with care. Analyses accounted for nonrandom selection using inverse probability weighting. RESULTS Among the 507 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 74.6 [15.7] years; 68.6% women), data were available on all patients 30 days postdischarge. HaH patients (n = 295) were older than controls (n = 212) and more likely to have a preacute functional impairment. HaH patients had shorter LOS (3.2 days vs 5.5 days; difference, −2.3 days; 95% CI, −1.8 to −2.7 days; weighted P < .001); lower rates of readmissions (8.6% [25] vs 15.6% [32]; difference, −7.0%; 95% CI, −12.9% to −1.1%; weighted P < .001), ED revisits (5.8% [17] vs 11.7% [24]; difference, −5.9%; 95% CI, −11.0% to −0.7%; weighted P < .001), and SNF admissions (1.7% [5] vs 10.4% [22]; difference, −8.7%; 95% CI, −13.0% to −4.3%; weighted P < .001); and were also more likely to rate their hospital care highly (68.8% [119] vs 45.3% [67]; difference, 23.5%; 95% CI, 12.9% to 34.1%; weighted P < .001). There were no differences in referrals to certified home health agencies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE HaH care bundled with a 30-day postacute transitional care episode was associated with better patient outcomes and ratings of care compared with inpatient hospitalization. This model warrants consideration for addition to Medicare’s current portfolio of shared savings programs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051412745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051412745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2562

DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2562

M3 - Article

C2 - 29946693

AN - SCOPUS:85051412745

VL - 178

SP - 1033

EP - 1041

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 8

ER -