Assessment of rehabilitation capacity in Ghana

Asare Christian, Jacob A Bentley, Richmond Aryeetey, Dzifa Ackuaku, Roberts S Mayer, Stephen T Wegener

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study describes a cross-sectional assessment of infrastructure, human resources, and types of rehabilitation interventions provided in a sample of healthcare facilities in Ghana. The objectives were to (a) develop and pilot a questionnaire assessing rehabilitation capacity in LMICs, and (b) provide initial data regarding available rehabilitation care in rural Ghana. Methods: Data was collected from a sample of rehabilitation workers at 9 facilities, comprised of 5 regional and 4 district hospitals, located in seven of the ten geographical regions of Ghana. Participants completed a modified version of the World Health Organisation's Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, adapted to reflect core indicators of rehabilitation infrastructure. Participating facilities were mailed questionnaires and agreed to subsequent site visits from the first author. Results: There were several limitations associated with basic rehabilitation infrastructure. Consistent with previous research, significant human resources limitations were observed as hospital-based rehabilitation services were primarily rendered by 20 physiotherapists and 21 physiotherapy assistants across the 9 participating sites. No rehabilitation physicians were identified at any of the surveyed facilities. With regard to therapeutic interventions, management of musculoskeletal impairments was generally consistent with current evidencebased practices, whereas rehabilitative approaches for neurologic conditions were limited to physical rather than sensory-motor modalities. Conclusions: For the first time there is study data which details the rehabilitation infrastructure, human resources, and interventions in Ghana. This study furthers the field through the adaptation and initial piloting of a rehabilitation assessment instrument that can be used in LMIC contexts. Limitations: The questionnaire used for the study was modified from the questionnaire for assessing surgical care in resource poor countries, and has not yet been validated. Since the study was conducted in a convenience sample of rehabilitation/physiotherapy centres in Ghana, generalisability may be limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-60
Number of pages28
JournalAsia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Ghana
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Centers
District Hospitals
Physical Therapists
Nervous System
Emergencies
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

Keywords

  • Access to services
  • Africa
  • Capacity building
  • Delivery of healthcare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Community and Home Care
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Research and Theory

Cite this

Assessment of rehabilitation capacity in Ghana. / Christian, Asare; Bentley, Jacob A; Aryeetey, Richmond; Ackuaku, Dzifa; Mayer, Roberts S; Wegener, Stephen T.

In: Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 33-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{490efb16e57b4858aaa8754d9ccfeb42,
title = "Assessment of rehabilitation capacity in Ghana",
abstract = "Purpose: This study describes a cross-sectional assessment of infrastructure, human resources, and types of rehabilitation interventions provided in a sample of healthcare facilities in Ghana. The objectives were to (a) develop and pilot a questionnaire assessing rehabilitation capacity in LMICs, and (b) provide initial data regarding available rehabilitation care in rural Ghana. Methods: Data was collected from a sample of rehabilitation workers at 9 facilities, comprised of 5 regional and 4 district hospitals, located in seven of the ten geographical regions of Ghana. Participants completed a modified version of the World Health Organisation's Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, adapted to reflect core indicators of rehabilitation infrastructure. Participating facilities were mailed questionnaires and agreed to subsequent site visits from the first author. Results: There were several limitations associated with basic rehabilitation infrastructure. Consistent with previous research, significant human resources limitations were observed as hospital-based rehabilitation services were primarily rendered by 20 physiotherapists and 21 physiotherapy assistants across the 9 participating sites. No rehabilitation physicians were identified at any of the surveyed facilities. With regard to therapeutic interventions, management of musculoskeletal impairments was generally consistent with current evidencebased practices, whereas rehabilitative approaches for neurologic conditions were limited to physical rather than sensory-motor modalities. Conclusions: For the first time there is study data which details the rehabilitation infrastructure, human resources, and interventions in Ghana. This study furthers the field through the adaptation and initial piloting of a rehabilitation assessment instrument that can be used in LMIC contexts. Limitations: The questionnaire used for the study was modified from the questionnaire for assessing surgical care in resource poor countries, and has not yet been validated. Since the study was conducted in a convenience sample of rehabilitation/physiotherapy centres in Ghana, generalisability may be limited.",
keywords = "Access to services, Africa, Capacity building, Delivery of healthcare",
author = "Asare Christian and Bentley, {Jacob A} and Richmond Aryeetey and Dzifa Ackuaku and Mayer, {Roberts S} and Wegener, {Stephen T}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5463/DCID.v27i1.494",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "33--60",
journal = "Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal",
issn = "1029-4414",
publisher = "Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of rehabilitation capacity in Ghana

AU - Christian, Asare

AU - Bentley, Jacob A

AU - Aryeetey, Richmond

AU - Ackuaku, Dzifa

AU - Mayer, Roberts S

AU - Wegener, Stephen T

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Purpose: This study describes a cross-sectional assessment of infrastructure, human resources, and types of rehabilitation interventions provided in a sample of healthcare facilities in Ghana. The objectives were to (a) develop and pilot a questionnaire assessing rehabilitation capacity in LMICs, and (b) provide initial data regarding available rehabilitation care in rural Ghana. Methods: Data was collected from a sample of rehabilitation workers at 9 facilities, comprised of 5 regional and 4 district hospitals, located in seven of the ten geographical regions of Ghana. Participants completed a modified version of the World Health Organisation's Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, adapted to reflect core indicators of rehabilitation infrastructure. Participating facilities were mailed questionnaires and agreed to subsequent site visits from the first author. Results: There were several limitations associated with basic rehabilitation infrastructure. Consistent with previous research, significant human resources limitations were observed as hospital-based rehabilitation services were primarily rendered by 20 physiotherapists and 21 physiotherapy assistants across the 9 participating sites. No rehabilitation physicians were identified at any of the surveyed facilities. With regard to therapeutic interventions, management of musculoskeletal impairments was generally consistent with current evidencebased practices, whereas rehabilitative approaches for neurologic conditions were limited to physical rather than sensory-motor modalities. Conclusions: For the first time there is study data which details the rehabilitation infrastructure, human resources, and interventions in Ghana. This study furthers the field through the adaptation and initial piloting of a rehabilitation assessment instrument that can be used in LMIC contexts. Limitations: The questionnaire used for the study was modified from the questionnaire for assessing surgical care in resource poor countries, and has not yet been validated. Since the study was conducted in a convenience sample of rehabilitation/physiotherapy centres in Ghana, generalisability may be limited.

AB - Purpose: This study describes a cross-sectional assessment of infrastructure, human resources, and types of rehabilitation interventions provided in a sample of healthcare facilities in Ghana. The objectives were to (a) develop and pilot a questionnaire assessing rehabilitation capacity in LMICs, and (b) provide initial data regarding available rehabilitation care in rural Ghana. Methods: Data was collected from a sample of rehabilitation workers at 9 facilities, comprised of 5 regional and 4 district hospitals, located in seven of the ten geographical regions of Ghana. Participants completed a modified version of the World Health Organisation's Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, adapted to reflect core indicators of rehabilitation infrastructure. Participating facilities were mailed questionnaires and agreed to subsequent site visits from the first author. Results: There were several limitations associated with basic rehabilitation infrastructure. Consistent with previous research, significant human resources limitations were observed as hospital-based rehabilitation services were primarily rendered by 20 physiotherapists and 21 physiotherapy assistants across the 9 participating sites. No rehabilitation physicians were identified at any of the surveyed facilities. With regard to therapeutic interventions, management of musculoskeletal impairments was generally consistent with current evidencebased practices, whereas rehabilitative approaches for neurologic conditions were limited to physical rather than sensory-motor modalities. Conclusions: For the first time there is study data which details the rehabilitation infrastructure, human resources, and interventions in Ghana. This study furthers the field through the adaptation and initial piloting of a rehabilitation assessment instrument that can be used in LMIC contexts. Limitations: The questionnaire used for the study was modified from the questionnaire for assessing surgical care in resource poor countries, and has not yet been validated. Since the study was conducted in a convenience sample of rehabilitation/physiotherapy centres in Ghana, generalisability may be limited.

KW - Access to services

KW - Africa

KW - Capacity building

KW - Delivery of healthcare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973875590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973875590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5463/DCID.v27i1.494

DO - 10.5463/DCID.v27i1.494

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973875590

VL - 27

SP - 33

EP - 60

JO - Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal

JF - Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal

SN - 1029-4414

IS - 1

ER -