Assessment of osteoarthritis initiativekellgren and lawrence scoring projects quality using computer analysis

Lior Shamir, David T. Felson, Luigi Ferrucci, Ilya G. Goldberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The detection of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a subjective task, and even two highly experienced and well-trained readers might not always agree on a specific case. This problem is noticeable in OA population studies, in which different scoring projects provide significantly different scores for the same knee X-rays. Here we propose a method for quantitative assessment and comparison of knee X-ray scoring projects in OA population studies. The method works by applying an image analysis method that automatically detects OA in knee X-ray images, and comparing the consistency of the scores when using each of the scoring projects as "gold standard." The method was applied to compare the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) clinic reading derived Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) scores to central reading, and showed that when using the derived K&L scores the automatic image analysis method was able to accurately differentiate between healthy joints and moderate OA joints in ∼70% of the cases. When the OAI central reading scores were used as gold standard, the detection accuracy was elevated to ∼77%. These results show that the OAI central readings scores are more consistent with the X-rays, indicating that the central reading better reflects the radiographic features associated with OA, compared to the OAI K&L scores derived from clinic readings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-201
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Musculoskeletal Research
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Osteoarthritis
Reading
X-Rays
Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee
Joints
Population

Keywords

  • Image analysis
  • OA datasets
  • OAI
  • Osteoarthritis Initiative
  • Population studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Assessment of osteoarthritis initiativekellgren and lawrence scoring projects quality using computer analysis. / Shamir, Lior; Felson, David T.; Ferrucci, Luigi; Goldberg, Ilya G.

In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 197-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shamir, Lior ; Felson, David T. ; Ferrucci, Luigi ; Goldberg, Ilya G. / Assessment of osteoarthritis initiativekellgren and lawrence scoring projects quality using computer analysis. In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2010 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 197-201.
@article{618d37c66db04966978a6d32ed80257e,
title = "Assessment of osteoarthritis initiativekellgren and lawrence scoring projects quality using computer analysis",
abstract = "The detection of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a subjective task, and even two highly experienced and well-trained readers might not always agree on a specific case. This problem is noticeable in OA population studies, in which different scoring projects provide significantly different scores for the same knee X-rays. Here we propose a method for quantitative assessment and comparison of knee X-ray scoring projects in OA population studies. The method works by applying an image analysis method that automatically detects OA in knee X-ray images, and comparing the consistency of the scores when using each of the scoring projects as {"}gold standard.{"} The method was applied to compare the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) clinic reading derived Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) scores to central reading, and showed that when using the derived K&L scores the automatic image analysis method was able to accurately differentiate between healthy joints and moderate OA joints in ∼70{\%} of the cases. When the OAI central reading scores were used as gold standard, the detection accuracy was elevated to ∼77{\%}. These results show that the OAI central readings scores are more consistent with the X-rays, indicating that the central reading better reflects the radiographic features associated with OA, compared to the OAI K&L scores derived from clinic readings.",
keywords = "Image analysis, OA datasets, OAI, Osteoarthritis Initiative, Population studies",
author = "Lior Shamir and Felson, {David T.} and Luigi Ferrucci and Goldberg, {Ilya G.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1142/S0218957710002612",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "197--201",
journal = "Journal of Musculoskeletal Research",
issn = "0218-9577",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of osteoarthritis initiativekellgren and lawrence scoring projects quality using computer analysis

AU - Shamir, Lior

AU - Felson, David T.

AU - Ferrucci, Luigi

AU - Goldberg, Ilya G.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - The detection of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a subjective task, and even two highly experienced and well-trained readers might not always agree on a specific case. This problem is noticeable in OA population studies, in which different scoring projects provide significantly different scores for the same knee X-rays. Here we propose a method for quantitative assessment and comparison of knee X-ray scoring projects in OA population studies. The method works by applying an image analysis method that automatically detects OA in knee X-ray images, and comparing the consistency of the scores when using each of the scoring projects as "gold standard." The method was applied to compare the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) clinic reading derived Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) scores to central reading, and showed that when using the derived K&L scores the automatic image analysis method was able to accurately differentiate between healthy joints and moderate OA joints in ∼70% of the cases. When the OAI central reading scores were used as gold standard, the detection accuracy was elevated to ∼77%. These results show that the OAI central readings scores are more consistent with the X-rays, indicating that the central reading better reflects the radiographic features associated with OA, compared to the OAI K&L scores derived from clinic readings.

AB - The detection of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a subjective task, and even two highly experienced and well-trained readers might not always agree on a specific case. This problem is noticeable in OA population studies, in which different scoring projects provide significantly different scores for the same knee X-rays. Here we propose a method for quantitative assessment and comparison of knee X-ray scoring projects in OA population studies. The method works by applying an image analysis method that automatically detects OA in knee X-ray images, and comparing the consistency of the scores when using each of the scoring projects as "gold standard." The method was applied to compare the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) clinic reading derived Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) scores to central reading, and showed that when using the derived K&L scores the automatic image analysis method was able to accurately differentiate between healthy joints and moderate OA joints in ∼70% of the cases. When the OAI central reading scores were used as gold standard, the detection accuracy was elevated to ∼77%. These results show that the OAI central readings scores are more consistent with the X-rays, indicating that the central reading better reflects the radiographic features associated with OA, compared to the OAI K&L scores derived from clinic readings.

KW - Image analysis

KW - OA datasets

KW - OAI

KW - Osteoarthritis Initiative

KW - Population studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960150467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960150467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1142/S0218957710002612

DO - 10.1142/S0218957710002612

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960150467

VL - 13

SP - 197

EP - 201

JO - Journal of Musculoskeletal Research

JF - Journal of Musculoskeletal Research

SN - 0218-9577

IS - 4

ER -