Assessment of functional status in patients with cardiac disease

Karin S. Coyne, Jerilyn K. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The evaluation of functional status as an outcome for patients with cardiac disease has become common practice in both clinical settings and research studies. However, the measurement of functional status lacks conceptual clarity, frequently focuses on only one dimension of functioning, and overlooks the individuality of the patient. Some measures of functional status have questionable sensitivity to capture change over time, or the ability to discriminate between groups, and lack reports of reliability and validity testing. The purpose of this article is to discuss critical issues related to the evaluation of functional status, with a focus on objective and subjective measures of functional status frequently used in cardiac populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-273
Number of pages11
JournalHeart and Lung: Journal of Critical Care
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1998

Fingerprint

Heart Diseases
Aptitude
Reproducibility of Results
Individuality
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Assessment of functional status in patients with cardiac disease. / Coyne, Karin S.; Allen, Jerilyn K.

In: Heart and Lung: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 27, No. 4, 07.1998, p. 263-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84a40f10a34642fca952a12eb51da248,
title = "Assessment of functional status in patients with cardiac disease",
abstract = "The evaluation of functional status as an outcome for patients with cardiac disease has become common practice in both clinical settings and research studies. However, the measurement of functional status lacks conceptual clarity, frequently focuses on only one dimension of functioning, and overlooks the individuality of the patient. Some measures of functional status have questionable sensitivity to capture change over time, or the ability to discriminate between groups, and lack reports of reliability and validity testing. The purpose of this article is to discuss critical issues related to the evaluation of functional status, with a focus on objective and subjective measures of functional status frequently used in cardiac populations.",
author = "Coyne, {Karin S.} and Allen, {Jerilyn K.}",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0147-9563(98)90038-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "263--273",
journal = "Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care",
issn = "0147-9563",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of functional status in patients with cardiac disease

AU - Coyne, Karin S.

AU - Allen, Jerilyn K.

PY - 1998/7

Y1 - 1998/7

N2 - The evaluation of functional status as an outcome for patients with cardiac disease has become common practice in both clinical settings and research studies. However, the measurement of functional status lacks conceptual clarity, frequently focuses on only one dimension of functioning, and overlooks the individuality of the patient. Some measures of functional status have questionable sensitivity to capture change over time, or the ability to discriminate between groups, and lack reports of reliability and validity testing. The purpose of this article is to discuss critical issues related to the evaluation of functional status, with a focus on objective and subjective measures of functional status frequently used in cardiac populations.

AB - The evaluation of functional status as an outcome for patients with cardiac disease has become common practice in both clinical settings and research studies. However, the measurement of functional status lacks conceptual clarity, frequently focuses on only one dimension of functioning, and overlooks the individuality of the patient. Some measures of functional status have questionable sensitivity to capture change over time, or the ability to discriminate between groups, and lack reports of reliability and validity testing. The purpose of this article is to discuss critical issues related to the evaluation of functional status, with a focus on objective and subjective measures of functional status frequently used in cardiac populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031928768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031928768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0147-9563(98)90038-3

DO - 10.1016/S0147-9563(98)90038-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 9713718

AN - SCOPUS:0031928768

VL - 27

SP - 263

EP - 273

JO - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

JF - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

SN - 0147-9563

IS - 4

ER -