Assessment of cocaine use with quantitative urinalysis and estimation of new uses

Kenzie L. Preston, Kenneth Silverman, Charles R. Schuster, Edward J. Cone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Qualitative urinalysis methods of monitoring cocaine use may over-detect frequency of use, possibly decreasing the ability of clinical trials to detect effective treatments. Quantitative urinalysis and newly developed criteria for identifying new cocaine use were evaluated as alternative measures of cocaine use. Urine specimens collected in a cocaine dosing study in non-treatment-seeking subjects (n = 5) and a cocaine treatment trial (n = 37) were analyzed for the cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine, with qualitative and quantitative methods. Pharmacokinetic criteria ('New Use' rules) were applied to quantitative data to identify occasions of new cocaine use. Results were compared to known cocaine administrations in the laboratory study and to self-reported drug use and qualitative urinalysis for subjects in the clinical trial. New Use criteria correctly identified cocaine administrations in the cocaine dosing study in all but a small number of specimens. In the clinical trial, quantitative urinalysis and estimated New Uses provided more information about patterns and frequency of use than qualitative urinalysis in the different treatment conditions in the clinical trial. Interpretation of quantitative urinalysis with New Use rules appears to be a useful method for monitoring treatment outcome and may be more accurate than traditional qualitative urinalysis in estimating frequency of cocaine use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)717-727
Number of pages11
JournalAddiction
Volume92
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Urinalysis
Cocaine
Clinical Trials
Pharmacokinetics
Urine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Assessment of cocaine use with quantitative urinalysis and estimation of new uses. / Preston, Kenzie L.; Silverman, Kenneth; Schuster, Charles R.; Cone, Edward J.

In: Addiction, Vol. 92, No. 6, 1997, p. 717-727.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Preston, Kenzie L. ; Silverman, Kenneth ; Schuster, Charles R. ; Cone, Edward J. / Assessment of cocaine use with quantitative urinalysis and estimation of new uses. In: Addiction. 1997 ; Vol. 92, No. 6. pp. 717-727.
@article{a653412bcd904844941f0f8275917b9c,
title = "Assessment of cocaine use with quantitative urinalysis and estimation of new uses",
abstract = "Qualitative urinalysis methods of monitoring cocaine use may over-detect frequency of use, possibly decreasing the ability of clinical trials to detect effective treatments. Quantitative urinalysis and newly developed criteria for identifying new cocaine use were evaluated as alternative measures of cocaine use. Urine specimens collected in a cocaine dosing study in non-treatment-seeking subjects (n = 5) and a cocaine treatment trial (n = 37) were analyzed for the cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine, with qualitative and quantitative methods. Pharmacokinetic criteria ('New Use' rules) were applied to quantitative data to identify occasions of new cocaine use. Results were compared to known cocaine administrations in the laboratory study and to self-reported drug use and qualitative urinalysis for subjects in the clinical trial. New Use criteria correctly identified cocaine administrations in the cocaine dosing study in all but a small number of specimens. In the clinical trial, quantitative urinalysis and estimated New Uses provided more information about patterns and frequency of use than qualitative urinalysis in the different treatment conditions in the clinical trial. Interpretation of quantitative urinalysis with New Use rules appears to be a useful method for monitoring treatment outcome and may be more accurate than traditional qualitative urinalysis in estimating frequency of cocaine use.",
author = "Preston, {Kenzie L.} and Kenneth Silverman and Schuster, {Charles R.} and Cone, {Edward J.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02938.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "717--727",
journal = "Addiction",
issn = "0965-2140",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of cocaine use with quantitative urinalysis and estimation of new uses

AU - Preston, Kenzie L.

AU - Silverman, Kenneth

AU - Schuster, Charles R.

AU - Cone, Edward J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Qualitative urinalysis methods of monitoring cocaine use may over-detect frequency of use, possibly decreasing the ability of clinical trials to detect effective treatments. Quantitative urinalysis and newly developed criteria for identifying new cocaine use were evaluated as alternative measures of cocaine use. Urine specimens collected in a cocaine dosing study in non-treatment-seeking subjects (n = 5) and a cocaine treatment trial (n = 37) were analyzed for the cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine, with qualitative and quantitative methods. Pharmacokinetic criteria ('New Use' rules) were applied to quantitative data to identify occasions of new cocaine use. Results were compared to known cocaine administrations in the laboratory study and to self-reported drug use and qualitative urinalysis for subjects in the clinical trial. New Use criteria correctly identified cocaine administrations in the cocaine dosing study in all but a small number of specimens. In the clinical trial, quantitative urinalysis and estimated New Uses provided more information about patterns and frequency of use than qualitative urinalysis in the different treatment conditions in the clinical trial. Interpretation of quantitative urinalysis with New Use rules appears to be a useful method for monitoring treatment outcome and may be more accurate than traditional qualitative urinalysis in estimating frequency of cocaine use.

AB - Qualitative urinalysis methods of monitoring cocaine use may over-detect frequency of use, possibly decreasing the ability of clinical trials to detect effective treatments. Quantitative urinalysis and newly developed criteria for identifying new cocaine use were evaluated as alternative measures of cocaine use. Urine specimens collected in a cocaine dosing study in non-treatment-seeking subjects (n = 5) and a cocaine treatment trial (n = 37) were analyzed for the cocaine metabolite, benzoylecgonine, with qualitative and quantitative methods. Pharmacokinetic criteria ('New Use' rules) were applied to quantitative data to identify occasions of new cocaine use. Results were compared to known cocaine administrations in the laboratory study and to self-reported drug use and qualitative urinalysis for subjects in the clinical trial. New Use criteria correctly identified cocaine administrations in the cocaine dosing study in all but a small number of specimens. In the clinical trial, quantitative urinalysis and estimated New Uses provided more information about patterns and frequency of use than qualitative urinalysis in the different treatment conditions in the clinical trial. Interpretation of quantitative urinalysis with New Use rules appears to be a useful method for monitoring treatment outcome and may be more accurate than traditional qualitative urinalysis in estimating frequency of cocaine use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030972817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030972817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02938.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02938.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 9246799

AN - SCOPUS:0030972817

VL - 92

SP - 717

EP - 727

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 6

ER -