Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty

Ali Mofidi, Johannes F. Plate, Bo Lu, Michael A. Conditt, Jason E. Lang, Gary G. Poehling, Riyaz H. Jinnah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse the accuracy of component placement during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a robotic-assisted system. Methods: Two hundred and six patients (232 knees) who underwent medial robotic-assisted UKA were retrospectively studied. Femoral and tibial sagittal and coronal alignments were measured in the post-operative radiographs and were compared with the equivalent measurements collected during the intra-operative period by the robotic system. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography was assessed against accuracy of the prosthesis insertion. Results: Robotic-assisted surgery for medial UKA resulted in an average difference of 2.2° ± 1.7° to 3.6° ± 3.3° depending on the component and radiographic view between the intra-operatively planned and post-operative measurements. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography (inaccuracy) was related to improper cementing technique of the prosthesis in all measurements (except for tibial sagittal axis) rather than wrong bony cuts performed by the robotic arm. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted medial UKA results in accurate prosthesis position. Inaccuracy may be attributed to suboptimal cementing technique. Level of evidence: Comparative retrospective study, Level III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1918-1925
Number of pages8
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Robotics
Arthroplasty
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Prostheses and Implants
Radiography
Thigh
Knee
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Knee
  • Robotics
  • Unicompartmental replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Mofidi, A., Plate, J. F., Lu, B., Conditt, M. A., Lang, J. E., Poehling, G. G., & Jinnah, R. H. (2014). Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 22(8), 1918-1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2969-6

Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty. / Mofidi, Ali; Plate, Johannes F.; Lu, Bo; Conditt, Michael A.; Lang, Jason E.; Poehling, Gary G.; Jinnah, Riyaz H.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 22, No. 8, 2014, p. 1918-1925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mofidi, A, Plate, JF, Lu, B, Conditt, MA, Lang, JE, Poehling, GG & Jinnah, RH 2014, 'Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty', Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1918-1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2969-6
Mofidi, Ali ; Plate, Johannes F. ; Lu, Bo ; Conditt, Michael A. ; Lang, Jason E. ; Poehling, Gary G. ; Jinnah, Riyaz H. / Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty. In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 8. pp. 1918-1925.
@article{401900f6936d41cdb633209a37dbd53c,
title = "Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse the accuracy of component placement during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a robotic-assisted system. Methods: Two hundred and six patients (232 knees) who underwent medial robotic-assisted UKA were retrospectively studied. Femoral and tibial sagittal and coronal alignments were measured in the post-operative radiographs and were compared with the equivalent measurements collected during the intra-operative period by the robotic system. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography was assessed against accuracy of the prosthesis insertion. Results: Robotic-assisted surgery for medial UKA resulted in an average difference of 2.2° ± 1.7° to 3.6° ± 3.3° depending on the component and radiographic view between the intra-operatively planned and post-operative measurements. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography (inaccuracy) was related to improper cementing technique of the prosthesis in all measurements (except for tibial sagittal axis) rather than wrong bony cuts performed by the robotic arm. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted medial UKA results in accurate prosthesis position. Inaccuracy may be attributed to suboptimal cementing technique. Level of evidence: Comparative retrospective study, Level III.",
keywords = "Arthroplasty, Knee, Robotics, Unicompartmental replacement",
author = "Ali Mofidi and Plate, {Johannes F.} and Bo Lu and Conditt, {Michael A.} and Lang, {Jason E.} and Poehling, {Gary G.} and Jinnah, {Riyaz H.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-014-2969-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1918--1925",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty

AU - Mofidi, Ali

AU - Plate, Johannes F.

AU - Lu, Bo

AU - Conditt, Michael A.

AU - Lang, Jason E.

AU - Poehling, Gary G.

AU - Jinnah, Riyaz H.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse the accuracy of component placement during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a robotic-assisted system. Methods: Two hundred and six patients (232 knees) who underwent medial robotic-assisted UKA were retrospectively studied. Femoral and tibial sagittal and coronal alignments were measured in the post-operative radiographs and were compared with the equivalent measurements collected during the intra-operative period by the robotic system. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography was assessed against accuracy of the prosthesis insertion. Results: Robotic-assisted surgery for medial UKA resulted in an average difference of 2.2° ± 1.7° to 3.6° ± 3.3° depending on the component and radiographic view between the intra-operatively planned and post-operative measurements. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography (inaccuracy) was related to improper cementing technique of the prosthesis in all measurements (except for tibial sagittal axis) rather than wrong bony cuts performed by the robotic arm. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted medial UKA results in accurate prosthesis position. Inaccuracy may be attributed to suboptimal cementing technique. Level of evidence: Comparative retrospective study, Level III.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse the accuracy of component placement during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a robotic-assisted system. Methods: Two hundred and six patients (232 knees) who underwent medial robotic-assisted UKA were retrospectively studied. Femoral and tibial sagittal and coronal alignments were measured in the post-operative radiographs and were compared with the equivalent measurements collected during the intra-operative period by the robotic system. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography was assessed against accuracy of the prosthesis insertion. Results: Robotic-assisted surgery for medial UKA resulted in an average difference of 2.2° ± 1.7° to 3.6° ± 3.3° depending on the component and radiographic view between the intra-operatively planned and post-operative measurements. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography (inaccuracy) was related to improper cementing technique of the prosthesis in all measurements (except for tibial sagittal axis) rather than wrong bony cuts performed by the robotic arm. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted medial UKA results in accurate prosthesis position. Inaccuracy may be attributed to suboptimal cementing technique. Level of evidence: Comparative retrospective study, Level III.

KW - Arthroplasty

KW - Knee

KW - Robotics

KW - Unicompartmental replacement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904570528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904570528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-014-2969-6

DO - 10.1007/s00167-014-2969-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 24744171

AN - SCOPUS:84904570528

VL - 22

SP - 1918

EP - 1925

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

IS - 8

ER -