Assessment: Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials

J. H. Ferguson, M. Brin, M. L. Goldstein, P. B. Gorelich, Daniel F Hanley, D. J. Lange, M. R. Nuwer, E. S. Roach, R. Goldman, D. Goodin, A. M. Marini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The different conclusions reached by studies investigating the utility of DSEPs prevent a confident conclusion regarding utility. Some investigators are strong believers in the diagnostic usefulness of this technique. Others are mere skeptical. One possible cause is variable study design. Most studies provide evidence no higher than level III (case reports, expert opinions). Controlled studies, especially with blinded interpreters of the tests, would provide needed evidence of efficacy in view of the existing confusion in the literature. It is our consensus that the current evidence supporting the diagnostic use of DSEPs is Type D and that DSEPs should be regarded as Investigational, meaning that current evidence is insufficient to determine appropriateness. This group does encourage further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1127-1130
Number of pages4
JournalNeurology
Volume49
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Expert Testimony
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Ferguson, J. H., Brin, M., Goldstein, M. L., Gorelich, P. B., Hanley, D. F., Lange, D. J., ... Marini, A. M. (1997). Assessment: Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurology, 49(4), 1127-1130.

Assessment : Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. / Ferguson, J. H.; Brin, M.; Goldstein, M. L.; Gorelich, P. B.; Hanley, Daniel F; Lange, D. J.; Nuwer, M. R.; Roach, E. S.; Goldman, R.; Goodin, D.; Marini, A. M.

In: Neurology, Vol. 49, No. 4, 10.1997, p. 1127-1130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferguson, JH, Brin, M, Goldstein, ML, Gorelich, PB, Hanley, DF, Lange, DJ, Nuwer, MR, Roach, ES, Goldman, R, Goodin, D & Marini, AM 1997, 'Assessment: Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials', Neurology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1127-1130.
Ferguson JH, Brin M, Goldstein ML, Gorelich PB, Hanley DF, Lange DJ et al. Assessment: Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurology. 1997 Oct;49(4):1127-1130.
Ferguson, J. H. ; Brin, M. ; Goldstein, M. L. ; Gorelich, P. B. ; Hanley, Daniel F ; Lange, D. J. ; Nuwer, M. R. ; Roach, E. S. ; Goldman, R. ; Goodin, D. ; Marini, A. M. / Assessment : Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. In: Neurology. 1997 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 1127-1130.
@article{910484fd9cdc46fba6c694fccac6103f,
title = "Assessment: Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials",
abstract = "The different conclusions reached by studies investigating the utility of DSEPs prevent a confident conclusion regarding utility. Some investigators are strong believers in the diagnostic usefulness of this technique. Others are mere skeptical. One possible cause is variable study design. Most studies provide evidence no higher than level III (case reports, expert opinions). Controlled studies, especially with blinded interpreters of the tests, would provide needed evidence of efficacy in view of the existing confusion in the literature. It is our consensus that the current evidence supporting the diagnostic use of DSEPs is Type D and that DSEPs should be regarded as Investigational, meaning that current evidence is insufficient to determine appropriateness. This group does encourage further study.",
author = "Ferguson, {J. H.} and M. Brin and Goldstein, {M. L.} and Gorelich, {P. B.} and Hanley, {Daniel F} and Lange, {D. J.} and Nuwer, {M. R.} and Roach, {E. S.} and R. Goldman and D. Goodin and Marini, {A. M.}",
year = "1997",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1127--1130",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment

T2 - Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials

AU - Ferguson, J. H.

AU - Brin, M.

AU - Goldstein, M. L.

AU - Gorelich, P. B.

AU - Hanley, Daniel F

AU - Lange, D. J.

AU - Nuwer, M. R.

AU - Roach, E. S.

AU - Goldman, R.

AU - Goodin, D.

AU - Marini, A. M.

PY - 1997/10

Y1 - 1997/10

N2 - The different conclusions reached by studies investigating the utility of DSEPs prevent a confident conclusion regarding utility. Some investigators are strong believers in the diagnostic usefulness of this technique. Others are mere skeptical. One possible cause is variable study design. Most studies provide evidence no higher than level III (case reports, expert opinions). Controlled studies, especially with blinded interpreters of the tests, would provide needed evidence of efficacy in view of the existing confusion in the literature. It is our consensus that the current evidence supporting the diagnostic use of DSEPs is Type D and that DSEPs should be regarded as Investigational, meaning that current evidence is insufficient to determine appropriateness. This group does encourage further study.

AB - The different conclusions reached by studies investigating the utility of DSEPs prevent a confident conclusion regarding utility. Some investigators are strong believers in the diagnostic usefulness of this technique. Others are mere skeptical. One possible cause is variable study design. Most studies provide evidence no higher than level III (case reports, expert opinions). Controlled studies, especially with blinded interpreters of the tests, would provide needed evidence of efficacy in view of the existing confusion in the literature. It is our consensus that the current evidence supporting the diagnostic use of DSEPs is Type D and that DSEPs should be regarded as Investigational, meaning that current evidence is insufficient to determine appropriateness. This group does encourage further study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030715314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030715314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9339700

AN - SCOPUS:0030715314

VL - 49

SP - 1127

EP - 1130

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 4

ER -