TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the Validity of Normalizing Aflatoxin B1-Lysine Albumin Adduct Biomarker Measurements to Total Serum Albumin Concentration across Multiple Human Population Studies
AU - Smith, Joshua W.
AU - Ng, Derek K.
AU - Alvarez, Christian S.
AU - Egner, Patricia A.
AU - Burke, Sean M.
AU - Chen, Jian Guo
AU - Kensler, Thomas W.
AU - Koshiol, Jill
AU - Rivera-Andrade, Alvaro
AU - Kroker-Lobos, María F.
AU - Ramírez-Zea, Manuel
AU - McGlynn, Katherine A.
AU - Groopman, John D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: The primary studies and the secondary analyses in this work were funded by the National Institutes of Health (USA) Intramural Research program and grants P01ES006052, P30CA006973, and T32ES00714; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (Chile) grant 15130011; Fondo Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo en Salud (Chile) grant SA11I2205; and National Science and Technology Mega-Projects (China) grants 2008ZX10002-015 and 2012ZX10002-008.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - The assessment of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) exposure using isotope-dilution liquid chromatogra-phy-mass spectrometry (LCMS) of AFB1-lysine adducts in human serum albumin (HSA) has proven to be a highly productive strategy for the biomonitoring of AFB1 exposure. To compare samples across different individuals and settings, the conventional practice has involved the normalization of raw AFB1-lysine adduct concentrations (e.g., pg/mL serum or plasma) to the total circulating HSA concentration (e.g., pg/mg HSA). It is hypothesized that this practice corrects for technical error, between-person variance in HSA synthesis or AFB1 metabolism, and other factors. However, the validity of this hypothesis has been largely unexamined by empirical analysis. The objective of this work was to test the concept that HSA normalization of AFB1-lysine adduct concentrations effectively adjusts for biological and technical variance and improves AFB1 internal dose estimates. Using data from AFB1-lysine and HSA measurements in 763 subjects, in combination with regression and Monte Carlo simulation techniques, we found that HSA accounts for essentially none of the between-person variance in HSA-normalized (R2 = 0.04) or raw AFB1-lysine measurements (R2 = 0.0001), and that HSA normalization of AFB1-lysine levels with empirical HSA values does not reduce measurement error any better than does the use of simulated data (n = 20,000). These findings were robust across diverse populations (Guatemala, China, Chile), AFB1 exposures (105 range), HSA assays (dye-binding and immunoassay), and disease states (healthy, gallstones, and gallbladder cancer). HSA normalization results in arithmetic transformation with the addition of technical error from the measurement of HSA. Combined with the added analysis time, cost, and sample consumption, these results suggest that it may be prudent to abandon the practice of normalizing adducts to HSA concentration when measuring any HSA adducts—not only AFB1-lys adducts—when using LCMS in serum/plasma.
AB - The assessment of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) exposure using isotope-dilution liquid chromatogra-phy-mass spectrometry (LCMS) of AFB1-lysine adducts in human serum albumin (HSA) has proven to be a highly productive strategy for the biomonitoring of AFB1 exposure. To compare samples across different individuals and settings, the conventional practice has involved the normalization of raw AFB1-lysine adduct concentrations (e.g., pg/mL serum or plasma) to the total circulating HSA concentration (e.g., pg/mg HSA). It is hypothesized that this practice corrects for technical error, between-person variance in HSA synthesis or AFB1 metabolism, and other factors. However, the validity of this hypothesis has been largely unexamined by empirical analysis. The objective of this work was to test the concept that HSA normalization of AFB1-lysine adduct concentrations effectively adjusts for biological and technical variance and improves AFB1 internal dose estimates. Using data from AFB1-lysine and HSA measurements in 763 subjects, in combination with regression and Monte Carlo simulation techniques, we found that HSA accounts for essentially none of the between-person variance in HSA-normalized (R2 = 0.04) or raw AFB1-lysine measurements (R2 = 0.0001), and that HSA normalization of AFB1-lysine levels with empirical HSA values does not reduce measurement error any better than does the use of simulated data (n = 20,000). These findings were robust across diverse populations (Guatemala, China, Chile), AFB1 exposures (105 range), HSA assays (dye-binding and immunoassay), and disease states (healthy, gallstones, and gallbladder cancer). HSA normalization results in arithmetic transformation with the addition of technical error from the measurement of HSA. Combined with the added analysis time, cost, and sample consumption, these results suggest that it may be prudent to abandon the practice of normalizing adducts to HSA concentration when measuring any HSA adducts—not only AFB1-lys adducts—when using LCMS in serum/plasma.
KW - Adduct
KW - Aflatoxin
KW - Albumin
KW - Biomarker
KW - Dosimetry
KW - Mass spectrometry
KW - Normalization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125650315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125650315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/toxins14030162
DO - 10.3390/toxins14030162
M3 - Article
C2 - 35324659
AN - SCOPUS:85125650315
SN - 2072-6651
VL - 14
JO - Toxins
JF - Toxins
IS - 3
M1 - 162
ER -