Assessing the quality of death and dying in an integrated health care system in rural Pennsylvania

Jonathan David Darer, Deseraé N. Clarke, Amanda C. Sees, Andrea L. Berger, H. Lester Kirchner, Rebecca A. Stametz, Daniel Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context With growing emphasis on improving the value of health care, there is increased scrutiny of quality outcomes and high health expenditures during the final months of life. Objectives The purpose of this project is to answer 1) how do next of kin (NOK) perceive the quality of their loved ones' dying and death; 2) are there patient and NOK characteristics that predict lower quality; and 3) are there structural aspects of care associated with lower quality? Methods A mailed survey was administered to a stratified random sample of NOK of Geisinger Health System patients who had died in the past year. The Quality of Death and Dying, the General Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire eight-item depression scale, and selected questions from the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End of Life Care were used. Results There were 672 respondents. Significant predictors of Quality of Death and Dying score were number of doctors involved in care (P = 0.0415), location of death (P <0.0001), frequency of receiving confusing or contradictory information (P <0.0001), illness progression (P = 0.0343), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score (P = 0.0148), and General Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale score (P <0.0070). Conclusion Several findings suggest that factors such as NOK depression and anxiety, prolonged illness, dying in the hospital, receipt of conflicting information, and confusion around the doctor in charge are associated with lower quality of the dying and death experience for NOK. Further investigation is warranted to facilitate high-quality measurement and the use of measurement results to improve care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-349.e6
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Integrated Delivery of Health Care
Anxiety Disorders
Health
Depression
Confusion
Terminal Care
Health Expenditures
Anxiety
Delivery of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • conflicting information
  • End-of-life care
  • next of kin
  • quality of dying and death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Assessing the quality of death and dying in an integrated health care system in rural Pennsylvania. / Darer, Jonathan David; Clarke, Deseraé N.; Sees, Amanda C.; Berger, Andrea L.; Kirchner, H. Lester; Stametz, Rebecca A.; Davis, Daniel.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 50, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 343-349.e6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Darer, Jonathan David ; Clarke, Deseraé N. ; Sees, Amanda C. ; Berger, Andrea L. ; Kirchner, H. Lester ; Stametz, Rebecca A. ; Davis, Daniel. / Assessing the quality of death and dying in an integrated health care system in rural Pennsylvania. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2015 ; Vol. 50, No. 3. pp. 343-349.e6.
@article{2f84ab6b1c1d4317a70030bec2cde2ef,
title = "Assessing the quality of death and dying in an integrated health care system in rural Pennsylvania",
abstract = "Context With growing emphasis on improving the value of health care, there is increased scrutiny of quality outcomes and high health expenditures during the final months of life. Objectives The purpose of this project is to answer 1) how do next of kin (NOK) perceive the quality of their loved ones' dying and death; 2) are there patient and NOK characteristics that predict lower quality; and 3) are there structural aspects of care associated with lower quality? Methods A mailed survey was administered to a stratified random sample of NOK of Geisinger Health System patients who had died in the past year. The Quality of Death and Dying, the General Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire eight-item depression scale, and selected questions from the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End of Life Care were used. Results There were 672 respondents. Significant predictors of Quality of Death and Dying score were number of doctors involved in care (P = 0.0415), location of death (P <0.0001), frequency of receiving confusing or contradictory information (P <0.0001), illness progression (P = 0.0343), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score (P = 0.0148), and General Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale score (P <0.0070). Conclusion Several findings suggest that factors such as NOK depression and anxiety, prolonged illness, dying in the hospital, receipt of conflicting information, and confusion around the doctor in charge are associated with lower quality of the dying and death experience for NOK. Further investigation is warranted to facilitate high-quality measurement and the use of measurement results to improve care.",
keywords = "conflicting information, End-of-life care, next of kin, quality of dying and death",
author = "Darer, {Jonathan David} and Clarke, {Desera{\'e} N.} and Sees, {Amanda C.} and Berger, {Andrea L.} and Kirchner, {H. Lester} and Stametz, {Rebecca A.} and Daniel Davis",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.03.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "343--349.e6",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the quality of death and dying in an integrated health care system in rural Pennsylvania

AU - Darer, Jonathan David

AU - Clarke, Deseraé N.

AU - Sees, Amanda C.

AU - Berger, Andrea L.

AU - Kirchner, H. Lester

AU - Stametz, Rebecca A.

AU - Davis, Daniel

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Context With growing emphasis on improving the value of health care, there is increased scrutiny of quality outcomes and high health expenditures during the final months of life. Objectives The purpose of this project is to answer 1) how do next of kin (NOK) perceive the quality of their loved ones' dying and death; 2) are there patient and NOK characteristics that predict lower quality; and 3) are there structural aspects of care associated with lower quality? Methods A mailed survey was administered to a stratified random sample of NOK of Geisinger Health System patients who had died in the past year. The Quality of Death and Dying, the General Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire eight-item depression scale, and selected questions from the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End of Life Care were used. Results There were 672 respondents. Significant predictors of Quality of Death and Dying score were number of doctors involved in care (P = 0.0415), location of death (P <0.0001), frequency of receiving confusing or contradictory information (P <0.0001), illness progression (P = 0.0343), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score (P = 0.0148), and General Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale score (P <0.0070). Conclusion Several findings suggest that factors such as NOK depression and anxiety, prolonged illness, dying in the hospital, receipt of conflicting information, and confusion around the doctor in charge are associated with lower quality of the dying and death experience for NOK. Further investigation is warranted to facilitate high-quality measurement and the use of measurement results to improve care.

AB - Context With growing emphasis on improving the value of health care, there is increased scrutiny of quality outcomes and high health expenditures during the final months of life. Objectives The purpose of this project is to answer 1) how do next of kin (NOK) perceive the quality of their loved ones' dying and death; 2) are there patient and NOK characteristics that predict lower quality; and 3) are there structural aspects of care associated with lower quality? Methods A mailed survey was administered to a stratified random sample of NOK of Geisinger Health System patients who had died in the past year. The Quality of Death and Dying, the General Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire eight-item depression scale, and selected questions from the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End of Life Care were used. Results There were 672 respondents. Significant predictors of Quality of Death and Dying score were number of doctors involved in care (P = 0.0415), location of death (P <0.0001), frequency of receiving confusing or contradictory information (P <0.0001), illness progression (P = 0.0343), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score (P = 0.0148), and General Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale score (P <0.0070). Conclusion Several findings suggest that factors such as NOK depression and anxiety, prolonged illness, dying in the hospital, receipt of conflicting information, and confusion around the doctor in charge are associated with lower quality of the dying and death experience for NOK. Further investigation is warranted to facilitate high-quality measurement and the use of measurement results to improve care.

KW - conflicting information

KW - End-of-life care

KW - next of kin

KW - quality of dying and death

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940453284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940453284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.03.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.03.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 25982156

AN - SCOPUS:84940453284

VL - 50

SP - 343-349.e6

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 3

ER -