Assessing the learning curve for prostate cancer surgery

Andrew J. Vickers, Alexandra Maschino, Caroline J. Savage, Angel M. Cronin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The idea that surgeon’s results improve with experience – a surgical learning curve – is commonly accepted. However, there have been very few studies empirically demonstrating a learning curve. We studied more than 10,000 prostate cancer patients from nine institutions who were treated by either open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. For open surgeries, increasing surgeon experience was associated with a dramatic decrease in the risk of recurrence up to about 250 operations. The learning curve was similar in magnitude for laparoscopic surgery, although it was somewhat slower, with 750 operations required for a comparable improvement in outcome. Fellowship training and prior open experience in laparoscopic surgeons both proved to be significant modifiers of the surgical learning curve: Only surgeons with fellowship training experienced an improvement in outcome with increasing experience; surgeons with open surgery experience conducting laparoscopic operations had poorer outcomes than those whose first operation was laparoscopic. The learning curve was seen for patients with both organ-confined and locally advanced tumors; excellent rates of cancer control for patients with organ-confined disease treated by the most experienced surgeons suggest that the primary reason such patients recur is inadequate surgical technique. Our experience with learning curves has taught us several key methodologic considerations for future learning curve research. The existence of the surgical learning curve poses a number of challenges to the surgical community, including questions of research, education, and clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRobotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition
PublisherSpringer-Verlag London Ltd
Pages49-60
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9781848828001, 9781848827998
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostatectomy
Research
Laparoscopy
Surgeons
Neoplasms
Education
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Clinical surgery outcomes
  • Radical prostatectomy
  • Surgical learning curve
  • Surgical outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Vickers, A. J., Maschino, A., Savage, C. J., & Cronin, A. M. (2012). Assessing the learning curve for prostate cancer surgery. In Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition (pp. 49-60). Springer-Verlag London Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_6

Assessing the learning curve for prostate cancer surgery. / Vickers, Andrew J.; Maschino, Alexandra; Savage, Caroline J.; Cronin, Angel M.

Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2012. p. 49-60.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Vickers, AJ, Maschino, A, Savage, CJ & Cronin, AM 2012, Assessing the learning curve for prostate cancer surgery. in Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, pp. 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_6
Vickers AJ, Maschino A, Savage CJ, Cronin AM. Assessing the learning curve for prostate cancer surgery. In Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2012. p. 49-60 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_6
Vickers, Andrew J. ; Maschino, Alexandra ; Savage, Caroline J. ; Cronin, Angel M. / Assessing the learning curve for prostate cancer surgery. Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2012. pp. 49-60
@inbook{8e2a2c5c578640518f4d76e15d0833e8,
title = "Assessing the learning curve for prostate cancer surgery",
abstract = "The idea that surgeon’s results improve with experience – a surgical learning curve – is commonly accepted. However, there have been very few studies empirically demonstrating a learning curve. We studied more than 10,000 prostate cancer patients from nine institutions who were treated by either open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. For open surgeries, increasing surgeon experience was associated with a dramatic decrease in the risk of recurrence up to about 250 operations. The learning curve was similar in magnitude for laparoscopic surgery, although it was somewhat slower, with 750 operations required for a comparable improvement in outcome. Fellowship training and prior open experience in laparoscopic surgeons both proved to be significant modifiers of the surgical learning curve: Only surgeons with fellowship training experienced an improvement in outcome with increasing experience; surgeons with open surgery experience conducting laparoscopic operations had poorer outcomes than those whose first operation was laparoscopic. The learning curve was seen for patients with both organ-confined and locally advanced tumors; excellent rates of cancer control for patients with organ-confined disease treated by the most experienced surgeons suggest that the primary reason such patients recur is inadequate surgical technique. Our experience with learning curves has taught us several key methodologic considerations for future learning curve research. The existence of the surgical learning curve poses a number of challenges to the surgical community, including questions of research, education, and clinical practice.",
keywords = "Clinical surgery outcomes, Radical prostatectomy, Surgical learning curve, Surgical outcomes",
author = "Vickers, {Andrew J.} and Alexandra Maschino and Savage, {Caroline J.} and Cronin, {Angel M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781848828001",
pages = "49--60",
booktitle = "Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Assessing the learning curve for prostate cancer surgery

AU - Vickers, Andrew J.

AU - Maschino, Alexandra

AU - Savage, Caroline J.

AU - Cronin, Angel M.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - The idea that surgeon’s results improve with experience – a surgical learning curve – is commonly accepted. However, there have been very few studies empirically demonstrating a learning curve. We studied more than 10,000 prostate cancer patients from nine institutions who were treated by either open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. For open surgeries, increasing surgeon experience was associated with a dramatic decrease in the risk of recurrence up to about 250 operations. The learning curve was similar in magnitude for laparoscopic surgery, although it was somewhat slower, with 750 operations required for a comparable improvement in outcome. Fellowship training and prior open experience in laparoscopic surgeons both proved to be significant modifiers of the surgical learning curve: Only surgeons with fellowship training experienced an improvement in outcome with increasing experience; surgeons with open surgery experience conducting laparoscopic operations had poorer outcomes than those whose first operation was laparoscopic. The learning curve was seen for patients with both organ-confined and locally advanced tumors; excellent rates of cancer control for patients with organ-confined disease treated by the most experienced surgeons suggest that the primary reason such patients recur is inadequate surgical technique. Our experience with learning curves has taught us several key methodologic considerations for future learning curve research. The existence of the surgical learning curve poses a number of challenges to the surgical community, including questions of research, education, and clinical practice.

AB - The idea that surgeon’s results improve with experience – a surgical learning curve – is commonly accepted. However, there have been very few studies empirically demonstrating a learning curve. We studied more than 10,000 prostate cancer patients from nine institutions who were treated by either open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. For open surgeries, increasing surgeon experience was associated with a dramatic decrease in the risk of recurrence up to about 250 operations. The learning curve was similar in magnitude for laparoscopic surgery, although it was somewhat slower, with 750 operations required for a comparable improvement in outcome. Fellowship training and prior open experience in laparoscopic surgeons both proved to be significant modifiers of the surgical learning curve: Only surgeons with fellowship training experienced an improvement in outcome with increasing experience; surgeons with open surgery experience conducting laparoscopic operations had poorer outcomes than those whose first operation was laparoscopic. The learning curve was seen for patients with both organ-confined and locally advanced tumors; excellent rates of cancer control for patients with organ-confined disease treated by the most experienced surgeons suggest that the primary reason such patients recur is inadequate surgical technique. Our experience with learning curves has taught us several key methodologic considerations for future learning curve research. The existence of the surgical learning curve poses a number of challenges to the surgical community, including questions of research, education, and clinical practice.

KW - Clinical surgery outcomes

KW - Radical prostatectomy

KW - Surgical learning curve

KW - Surgical outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956814826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956814826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_6

DO - 10.1007/978-1-84882-800-1_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84956814826

SN - 9781848828001

SN - 9781848827998

SP - 49

EP - 60

BT - Robotic Urologic Surgery, Second Edition

PB - Springer-Verlag London Ltd

ER -