Assessing the Generalizability of Randomized Trial Results to Target Populations

Elizabeth Stuart, Catherine P. Bradshaw, Philip Leaf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent years have seen increasing interest in and attention to evidence-based practices, where the “evidence” generally comes from well-conducted randomized trials. However, while those trials yield accurate estimates of the effect of the intervention for the participants in the trial (known as “internal validity”), they do not always yield relevant information about the effects in a particular target population (known as “external validity”). This may be due to a lack of specification of a target population when designing the trial, difficulties recruiting a sample that is representative of a prespecified target population, or to interest in considering a target population somewhat different from the population directly targeted by the trial. This paper first provides an overview of existing design and analysis methods for assessing and enhancing the ability of a randomized trial to estimate treatment effects in a target population. It then provides a case study using one particular method, which weights the subjects in a randomized trial to match the population on a set of observed characteristics. The case study uses data from a randomized trial of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS); our interest is in generalizing the results to the state of Maryland. In the case of PBIS, after weighting, estimated effects in the target population were similar to those observed in the randomized trial. The paper illustrates that statistical methods can be used to assess and enhance the external validity of randomized trials, making the results more applicable to policy and clinical questions. However, there are also many open research questions; future research should focus on questions of treatment effect heterogeneity and further developing these methods for enhancing external validity. Researchers should think carefully about the external validity of randomized trials and be cautious about extrapolating results to specific populations unless they are confident of the similarity between the trial sample and that target population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-485
Number of pages11
JournalPrevention Science
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Health Services Needs and Demand
Population
Evidence-Based Practice
Research Personnel
Weights and Measures
Research

Keywords

  • Horvitz-Thompson weighting
  • Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS)
  • Propensity scores

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Assessing the Generalizability of Randomized Trial Results to Target Populations. / Stuart, Elizabeth; Bradshaw, Catherine P.; Leaf, Philip.

In: Prevention Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2015, p. 475-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41075b8d626c4c4fbe11d50bba1af15a,
title = "Assessing the Generalizability of Randomized Trial Results to Target Populations",
abstract = "Recent years have seen increasing interest in and attention to evidence-based practices, where the “evidence” generally comes from well-conducted randomized trials. However, while those trials yield accurate estimates of the effect of the intervention for the participants in the trial (known as “internal validity”), they do not always yield relevant information about the effects in a particular target population (known as “external validity”). This may be due to a lack of specification of a target population when designing the trial, difficulties recruiting a sample that is representative of a prespecified target population, or to interest in considering a target population somewhat different from the population directly targeted by the trial. This paper first provides an overview of existing design and analysis methods for assessing and enhancing the ability of a randomized trial to estimate treatment effects in a target population. It then provides a case study using one particular method, which weights the subjects in a randomized trial to match the population on a set of observed characteristics. The case study uses data from a randomized trial of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS); our interest is in generalizing the results to the state of Maryland. In the case of PBIS, after weighting, estimated effects in the target population were similar to those observed in the randomized trial. The paper illustrates that statistical methods can be used to assess and enhance the external validity of randomized trials, making the results more applicable to policy and clinical questions. However, there are also many open research questions; future research should focus on questions of treatment effect heterogeneity and further developing these methods for enhancing external validity. Researchers should think carefully about the external validity of randomized trials and be cautious about extrapolating results to specific populations unless they are confident of the similarity between the trial sample and that target population.",
keywords = "Horvitz-Thompson weighting, Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS), Propensity scores",
author = "Elizabeth Stuart and Bradshaw, {Catherine P.} and Philip Leaf",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s11121-014-0513-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "475--485",
journal = "Prevention Science",
issn = "1389-4986",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the Generalizability of Randomized Trial Results to Target Populations

AU - Stuart, Elizabeth

AU - Bradshaw, Catherine P.

AU - Leaf, Philip

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Recent years have seen increasing interest in and attention to evidence-based practices, where the “evidence” generally comes from well-conducted randomized trials. However, while those trials yield accurate estimates of the effect of the intervention for the participants in the trial (known as “internal validity”), they do not always yield relevant information about the effects in a particular target population (known as “external validity”). This may be due to a lack of specification of a target population when designing the trial, difficulties recruiting a sample that is representative of a prespecified target population, or to interest in considering a target population somewhat different from the population directly targeted by the trial. This paper first provides an overview of existing design and analysis methods for assessing and enhancing the ability of a randomized trial to estimate treatment effects in a target population. It then provides a case study using one particular method, which weights the subjects in a randomized trial to match the population on a set of observed characteristics. The case study uses data from a randomized trial of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS); our interest is in generalizing the results to the state of Maryland. In the case of PBIS, after weighting, estimated effects in the target population were similar to those observed in the randomized trial. The paper illustrates that statistical methods can be used to assess and enhance the external validity of randomized trials, making the results more applicable to policy and clinical questions. However, there are also many open research questions; future research should focus on questions of treatment effect heterogeneity and further developing these methods for enhancing external validity. Researchers should think carefully about the external validity of randomized trials and be cautious about extrapolating results to specific populations unless they are confident of the similarity between the trial sample and that target population.

AB - Recent years have seen increasing interest in and attention to evidence-based practices, where the “evidence” generally comes from well-conducted randomized trials. However, while those trials yield accurate estimates of the effect of the intervention for the participants in the trial (known as “internal validity”), they do not always yield relevant information about the effects in a particular target population (known as “external validity”). This may be due to a lack of specification of a target population when designing the trial, difficulties recruiting a sample that is representative of a prespecified target population, or to interest in considering a target population somewhat different from the population directly targeted by the trial. This paper first provides an overview of existing design and analysis methods for assessing and enhancing the ability of a randomized trial to estimate treatment effects in a target population. It then provides a case study using one particular method, which weights the subjects in a randomized trial to match the population on a set of observed characteristics. The case study uses data from a randomized trial of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS); our interest is in generalizing the results to the state of Maryland. In the case of PBIS, after weighting, estimated effects in the target population were similar to those observed in the randomized trial. The paper illustrates that statistical methods can be used to assess and enhance the external validity of randomized trials, making the results more applicable to policy and clinical questions. However, there are also many open research questions; future research should focus on questions of treatment effect heterogeneity and further developing these methods for enhancing external validity. Researchers should think carefully about the external validity of randomized trials and be cautious about extrapolating results to specific populations unless they are confident of the similarity between the trial sample and that target population.

KW - Horvitz-Thompson weighting

KW - Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS)

KW - Propensity scores

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925488414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925488414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11121-014-0513-z

DO - 10.1007/s11121-014-0513-z

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 475

EP - 485

JO - Prevention Science

JF - Prevention Science

SN - 1389-4986

IS - 3

ER -