Assessing the effectiveness of critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in the surgical intensive care unit

Sean Berenholtz, Peter Pronovost, Pamela A Lipsett, Patty Dawson, Todd Dorman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of procedure-specific surgical critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in a university surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Design and setting: Prospective cohort study in a university surgical ICU. Patients: 194 patients, accounting for 255 patient days, sampled on randomly selected days over a 12-month period of time. Measurements and results: The primary outcomes of this study were pathway eligibility and laboratory utilization. Patients were eligible for a procedure-specific pathway in 34% of patient days identified, and the patient's clinical course was "on" pathway in 22% of patient days. Of those "on" the pathway, 54% had a pathway present in the chart and 32% of these included documentation of the patient's clinical course. Thus in 78% of the patient days the patient was either not eligible for a critical pathway or the patient's clinical course was "off" pathway. In those patients "on" the pathway 46% did not have a pathway present in the chart. Being on a critical pathway did not reduce laboratory utilization. Laboratory utilization did not vary between patients "on" and "off" the pathway (19.1 ± 11.3 laboratory tests/patient day versus 20.4 ± 5.7 laboratory tests/patient day). Predicted laboratory utilization by the pathway was 5.6 laboratory tests/patient day. By reducing actual laboratory utilization to that predicted by the critical pathway we would reduce laboratory utilization at our institution by $1.2 million per year. Conclusions: Procedure-specific surgical critical pathways are not an effective tool for reducing resource utilization in our ICU. Most of our patients were not eligible for an available pathway, and those who were eligible and were "on" the pathway did not appear to have laboratory utilization guided by the pathway. Future initiatives need to explore other means such as ICU-specific care processes to reduce resource utilization in the ICU.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1029-1036
Number of pages8
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Critical Pathways
Critical Care
Intensive Care Units

Keywords

  • Critical illness
  • Critical pathways/utilization
  • Intensive care
  • Laboratory/utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Assessing the effectiveness of critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in the surgical intensive care unit. / Berenholtz, Sean; Pronovost, Peter; Lipsett, Pamela A; Dawson, Patty; Dorman, Todd.

In: Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2001, p. 1029-1036.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd3890c64fb24ac297cc333526a6d922,
title = "Assessing the effectiveness of critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in the surgical intensive care unit",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of procedure-specific surgical critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in a university surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Design and setting: Prospective cohort study in a university surgical ICU. Patients: 194 patients, accounting for 255 patient days, sampled on randomly selected days over a 12-month period of time. Measurements and results: The primary outcomes of this study were pathway eligibility and laboratory utilization. Patients were eligible for a procedure-specific pathway in 34{\%} of patient days identified, and the patient's clinical course was {"}on{"} pathway in 22{\%} of patient days. Of those {"}on{"} the pathway, 54{\%} had a pathway present in the chart and 32{\%} of these included documentation of the patient's clinical course. Thus in 78{\%} of the patient days the patient was either not eligible for a critical pathway or the patient's clinical course was {"}off{"} pathway. In those patients {"}on{"} the pathway 46{\%} did not have a pathway present in the chart. Being on a critical pathway did not reduce laboratory utilization. Laboratory utilization did not vary between patients {"}on{"} and {"}off{"} the pathway (19.1 ± 11.3 laboratory tests/patient day versus 20.4 ± 5.7 laboratory tests/patient day). Predicted laboratory utilization by the pathway was 5.6 laboratory tests/patient day. By reducing actual laboratory utilization to that predicted by the critical pathway we would reduce laboratory utilization at our institution by $1.2 million per year. Conclusions: Procedure-specific surgical critical pathways are not an effective tool for reducing resource utilization in our ICU. Most of our patients were not eligible for an available pathway, and those who were eligible and were {"}on{"} the pathway did not appear to have laboratory utilization guided by the pathway. Future initiatives need to explore other means such as ICU-specific care processes to reduce resource utilization in the ICU.",
keywords = "Critical illness, Critical pathways/utilization, Intensive care, Laboratory/utilization",
author = "Sean Berenholtz and Peter Pronovost and Lipsett, {Pamela A} and Patty Dawson and Todd Dorman",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1007/s001340100952",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1029--1036",
journal = "Intensive Care Medicine",
issn = "0342-4642",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the effectiveness of critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in the surgical intensive care unit

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

AU - Pronovost, Peter

AU - Lipsett, Pamela A

AU - Dawson, Patty

AU - Dorman, Todd

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of procedure-specific surgical critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in a university surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Design and setting: Prospective cohort study in a university surgical ICU. Patients: 194 patients, accounting for 255 patient days, sampled on randomly selected days over a 12-month period of time. Measurements and results: The primary outcomes of this study were pathway eligibility and laboratory utilization. Patients were eligible for a procedure-specific pathway in 34% of patient days identified, and the patient's clinical course was "on" pathway in 22% of patient days. Of those "on" the pathway, 54% had a pathway present in the chart and 32% of these included documentation of the patient's clinical course. Thus in 78% of the patient days the patient was either not eligible for a critical pathway or the patient's clinical course was "off" pathway. In those patients "on" the pathway 46% did not have a pathway present in the chart. Being on a critical pathway did not reduce laboratory utilization. Laboratory utilization did not vary between patients "on" and "off" the pathway (19.1 ± 11.3 laboratory tests/patient day versus 20.4 ± 5.7 laboratory tests/patient day). Predicted laboratory utilization by the pathway was 5.6 laboratory tests/patient day. By reducing actual laboratory utilization to that predicted by the critical pathway we would reduce laboratory utilization at our institution by $1.2 million per year. Conclusions: Procedure-specific surgical critical pathways are not an effective tool for reducing resource utilization in our ICU. Most of our patients were not eligible for an available pathway, and those who were eligible and were "on" the pathway did not appear to have laboratory utilization guided by the pathway. Future initiatives need to explore other means such as ICU-specific care processes to reduce resource utilization in the ICU.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of procedure-specific surgical critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in a university surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Design and setting: Prospective cohort study in a university surgical ICU. Patients: 194 patients, accounting for 255 patient days, sampled on randomly selected days over a 12-month period of time. Measurements and results: The primary outcomes of this study were pathway eligibility and laboratory utilization. Patients were eligible for a procedure-specific pathway in 34% of patient days identified, and the patient's clinical course was "on" pathway in 22% of patient days. Of those "on" the pathway, 54% had a pathway present in the chart and 32% of these included documentation of the patient's clinical course. Thus in 78% of the patient days the patient was either not eligible for a critical pathway or the patient's clinical course was "off" pathway. In those patients "on" the pathway 46% did not have a pathway present in the chart. Being on a critical pathway did not reduce laboratory utilization. Laboratory utilization did not vary between patients "on" and "off" the pathway (19.1 ± 11.3 laboratory tests/patient day versus 20.4 ± 5.7 laboratory tests/patient day). Predicted laboratory utilization by the pathway was 5.6 laboratory tests/patient day. By reducing actual laboratory utilization to that predicted by the critical pathway we would reduce laboratory utilization at our institution by $1.2 million per year. Conclusions: Procedure-specific surgical critical pathways are not an effective tool for reducing resource utilization in our ICU. Most of our patients were not eligible for an available pathway, and those who were eligible and were "on" the pathway did not appear to have laboratory utilization guided by the pathway. Future initiatives need to explore other means such as ICU-specific care processes to reduce resource utilization in the ICU.

KW - Critical illness

KW - Critical pathways/utilization

KW - Intensive care

KW - Laboratory/utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034917223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034917223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s001340100952

DO - 10.1007/s001340100952

M3 - Article

C2 - 11497135

AN - SCOPUS:0034917223

VL - 27

SP - 1029

EP - 1036

JO - Intensive Care Medicine

JF - Intensive Care Medicine

SN - 0342-4642

IS - 6

ER -