Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries: Development of an instrument and initial findings

Eliza Mountcastle-Shah, Ellen Tambor, Barbara A. Bernhardt, Gail Geller, Reda Karaliukas, Joann Ellison Rodgers, Neil A. Holtzman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To develop an instrument to assess the content and balance of media stories about genetic discoveries relevant to human diseases and assess its ability to detect variability. Methods: Consumer focus groups to help develop the instrument, and surveys of scientists and journalists to evaluate the items. Ratings by at least two readers assessed reliability. Variability was measured by comparing scores of 47 stories emanating from two discoveries. Results: Reader agreement on content items was good (kappa = 0.74). Consumers, scientists, and journalists were in substantial agreement about what content items should be included. Some items deemed essential by journalists appeared in very few stories. One-third of stories exaggerated the benefits of the discovery and one-third presented a balanced selection of expert opinion. Coverage of specific items varied from 11.5 percent to 84.6 percent. The instrument is reliable; contains items deemed important by consumers, scientists, and journalists; and detects variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)458-478
Number of pages21
JournalScience Communication
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

mass media
journalist
Disease
coverage
rating
expert
ability
Group

Keywords

  • Genetic discoveries
  • Genetic diseases
  • Genetic tests
  • Genetics
  • Mass media

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries : Development of an instrument and initial findings. / Mountcastle-Shah, Eliza; Tambor, Ellen; Bernhardt, Barbara A.; Geller, Gail; Karaliukas, Reda; Rodgers, Joann Ellison; Holtzman, Neil A.

In: Science Communication, Vol. 24, No. 4, 06.2003, p. 458-478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mountcastle-Shah, E, Tambor, E, Bernhardt, BA, Geller, G, Karaliukas, R, Rodgers, JE & Holtzman, NA 2003, 'Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries: Development of an instrument and initial findings', Science Communication, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 458-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547003024004003
Mountcastle-Shah, Eliza ; Tambor, Ellen ; Bernhardt, Barbara A. ; Geller, Gail ; Karaliukas, Reda ; Rodgers, Joann Ellison ; Holtzman, Neil A. / Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries : Development of an instrument and initial findings. In: Science Communication. 2003 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 458-478.
@article{d1ac032a04e546caa6b318b2573dbb9f,
title = "Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries: Development of an instrument and initial findings",
abstract = "To develop an instrument to assess the content and balance of media stories about genetic discoveries relevant to human diseases and assess its ability to detect variability. Methods: Consumer focus groups to help develop the instrument, and surveys of scientists and journalists to evaluate the items. Ratings by at least two readers assessed reliability. Variability was measured by comparing scores of 47 stories emanating from two discoveries. Results: Reader agreement on content items was good (kappa = 0.74). Consumers, scientists, and journalists were in substantial agreement about what content items should be included. Some items deemed essential by journalists appeared in very few stories. One-third of stories exaggerated the benefits of the discovery and one-third presented a balanced selection of expert opinion. Coverage of specific items varied from 11.5 percent to 84.6 percent. The instrument is reliable; contains items deemed important by consumers, scientists, and journalists; and detects variability.",
keywords = "Genetic discoveries, Genetic diseases, Genetic tests, Genetics, Mass media",
author = "Eliza Mountcastle-Shah and Ellen Tambor and Bernhardt, {Barbara A.} and Gail Geller and Reda Karaliukas and Rodgers, {Joann Ellison} and Holtzman, {Neil A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1075547003024004003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "458--478",
journal = "Science Communication",
issn = "1075-5470",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries

T2 - Development of an instrument and initial findings

AU - Mountcastle-Shah, Eliza

AU - Tambor, Ellen

AU - Bernhardt, Barbara A.

AU - Geller, Gail

AU - Karaliukas, Reda

AU - Rodgers, Joann Ellison

AU - Holtzman, Neil A.

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - To develop an instrument to assess the content and balance of media stories about genetic discoveries relevant to human diseases and assess its ability to detect variability. Methods: Consumer focus groups to help develop the instrument, and surveys of scientists and journalists to evaluate the items. Ratings by at least two readers assessed reliability. Variability was measured by comparing scores of 47 stories emanating from two discoveries. Results: Reader agreement on content items was good (kappa = 0.74). Consumers, scientists, and journalists were in substantial agreement about what content items should be included. Some items deemed essential by journalists appeared in very few stories. One-third of stories exaggerated the benefits of the discovery and one-third presented a balanced selection of expert opinion. Coverage of specific items varied from 11.5 percent to 84.6 percent. The instrument is reliable; contains items deemed important by consumers, scientists, and journalists; and detects variability.

AB - To develop an instrument to assess the content and balance of media stories about genetic discoveries relevant to human diseases and assess its ability to detect variability. Methods: Consumer focus groups to help develop the instrument, and surveys of scientists and journalists to evaluate the items. Ratings by at least two readers assessed reliability. Variability was measured by comparing scores of 47 stories emanating from two discoveries. Results: Reader agreement on content items was good (kappa = 0.74). Consumers, scientists, and journalists were in substantial agreement about what content items should be included. Some items deemed essential by journalists appeared in very few stories. One-third of stories exaggerated the benefits of the discovery and one-third presented a balanced selection of expert opinion. Coverage of specific items varied from 11.5 percent to 84.6 percent. The instrument is reliable; contains items deemed important by consumers, scientists, and journalists; and detects variability.

KW - Genetic discoveries

KW - Genetic diseases

KW - Genetic tests

KW - Genetics

KW - Mass media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037595515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037595515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1075547003024004003

DO - 10.1177/1075547003024004003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037595515

VL - 24

SP - 458

EP - 478

JO - Science Communication

JF - Science Communication

SN - 1075-5470

IS - 4

ER -