Assessing mandatory HPV vaccination: Who should call the shots?

Gail Javitt, Deena Berkowitz, Lawrence O. Gostin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 2007, many legislatures considered, and two enacted, bills mandating HPV vaccination for young girls as a condition of school attendance. Such mandates raise signifcant legal, ethical, and social concerns. This paper argues that mandating HPV vaccination for minor females is premature since long-term safety and efectiveness of the vaccine has not been established, HPV does not pose imminent and signifcant risk of harm to others, a sex specifc mandate raises constitutional concerns, and a mandate will burden fnancially existing government health programs and private physicians. Absent careful consideration and public conversation, HPV mandates may undermine coverage rates for other vaccines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)384-395
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

vaccination
Vaccination
Vaccines
Government Programs
school attendance
bill
conversation
coverage
physician
Physicians
Safety
Health
health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Assessing mandatory HPV vaccination : Who should call the shots? / Javitt, Gail; Berkowitz, Deena; Gostin, Lawrence O.

In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 36, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 384-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Javitt, Gail ; Berkowitz, Deena ; Gostin, Lawrence O. / Assessing mandatory HPV vaccination : Who should call the shots?. In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 384-395.
@article{3fb497aa23e04b47b7e5d3be4d4b3bc0,
title = "Assessing mandatory HPV vaccination: Who should call the shots?",
abstract = "In 2007, many legislatures considered, and two enacted, bills mandating HPV vaccination for young girls as a condition of school attendance. Such mandates raise signifcant legal, ethical, and social concerns. This paper argues that mandating HPV vaccination for minor females is premature since long-term safety and efectiveness of the vaccine has not been established, HPV does not pose imminent and signifcant risk of harm to others, a sex specifc mandate raises constitutional concerns, and a mandate will burden fnancially existing government health programs and private physicians. Absent careful consideration and public conversation, HPV mandates may undermine coverage rates for other vaccines.",
author = "Gail Javitt and Deena Berkowitz and Gostin, {Lawrence O.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00282.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "384--395",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing mandatory HPV vaccination

T2 - Who should call the shots?

AU - Javitt, Gail

AU - Berkowitz, Deena

AU - Gostin, Lawrence O.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - In 2007, many legislatures considered, and two enacted, bills mandating HPV vaccination for young girls as a condition of school attendance. Such mandates raise signifcant legal, ethical, and social concerns. This paper argues that mandating HPV vaccination for minor females is premature since long-term safety and efectiveness of the vaccine has not been established, HPV does not pose imminent and signifcant risk of harm to others, a sex specifc mandate raises constitutional concerns, and a mandate will burden fnancially existing government health programs and private physicians. Absent careful consideration and public conversation, HPV mandates may undermine coverage rates for other vaccines.

AB - In 2007, many legislatures considered, and two enacted, bills mandating HPV vaccination for young girls as a condition of school attendance. Such mandates raise signifcant legal, ethical, and social concerns. This paper argues that mandating HPV vaccination for minor females is premature since long-term safety and efectiveness of the vaccine has not been established, HPV does not pose imminent and signifcant risk of harm to others, a sex specifc mandate raises constitutional concerns, and a mandate will burden fnancially existing government health programs and private physicians. Absent careful consideration and public conversation, HPV mandates may undermine coverage rates for other vaccines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44949117734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44949117734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00282.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00282.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18547207

AN - SCOPUS:44949117734

VL - 36

SP - 384

EP - 395

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 2

ER -