TY - JOUR
T1 - Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Prevalence and Arrhythmic Outcomes in At-Risk Family Members
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Sharma, Apurva
AU - Bosman, Laurens P.
AU - Tichnell, Crystal
AU - Nanavati, Julie
AU - Murray, Brittney
AU - Nonyane, Bareng A.S.
AU - Tandri, Harikrishna
AU - Calkins, Hugh
AU - James, Cynthia A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to acknowledge funding from Fondation Leducq’ (VT)/Boston Scientific Corp. The Johns Hopkins ARVD/C Program is supported by the Leonie-Wild Foundation, the Leyla Erkan Family Fund for ARVD Research, the Dr Francis P. Chiramonte Private Foundation, the Dr Satish, Rupal, and Robin Shah ARVD Fund at Johns Hopkins, the Bogle Foundation, the Healing Hearts Foundation, the Campanella family, the Patrick J. Harrison Family, the Peter French Memorial Foundation, and the Wilmerding Endowments. We are grateful to the ARVD/C patients and families who have made this work possible.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a complex cardiomyopathy with autosomal dominant inheritance and age-related incomplete penetrance, characterized by a high risk of sudden cardiac death. Recent professional consensus guidelines recommend clinical cardiac lifelong serial screening for at-risk family members refined only by age, but family genotype might influence necessary screening. Although numerous studies report prevalence of disease and arrhythmia in family members and explore predictors of penetrance and arrhythmic risk, a systematic review consolidating this evidence is lacking. Methods: We searched Medline (PubMed), Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies that reported prevalence of (1) diagnosis of ARVC per 2010 Task Force Criteria and/or (2) sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in at least 10 family members of definite patients with ARVC. Results: We identified 41 studies, including 36 that reported diagnosis by Task Force Criteria and 22 VA. Meta-analysis of 1359 family members, from 13 unique cohorts showed an average prevalence estimate of 25% for diagnosis as per Task Force Criteria (95% CI, 0.15-0.35, I2=96.44%). Overall prevalence of VA among gene-positive family members was 18% (95% CI, 0.13-0.23, I2=33.25%) in 7 independent studies (n=597). Family genotype was a significant risk factor for diagnosis of both ARVC (odds ratio, 6.91 [95% CI, 1.27-37.70]; P=0.0005) and VA (odds ratio, 13.62 [95% CI, 0.91-204.13]; P=0.06). Male gender was not associated with disease prevalence (odds ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.72-1.95]; P=0.42) or VA (odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.51-1.29]; P=0.91). Conclusions: The prevalence of ARVC and VA in at-risk family members differs significantly based on family genotype. Although recent recommendations provide a guideline based only on age, we propose screening every 1 to 2 years for gene-positive family members and every 3 to 5 years for first-degree relatives of gene-elusive cases, as long as they are asymptomatic and not athletes.
AB - Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a complex cardiomyopathy with autosomal dominant inheritance and age-related incomplete penetrance, characterized by a high risk of sudden cardiac death. Recent professional consensus guidelines recommend clinical cardiac lifelong serial screening for at-risk family members refined only by age, but family genotype might influence necessary screening. Although numerous studies report prevalence of disease and arrhythmia in family members and explore predictors of penetrance and arrhythmic risk, a systematic review consolidating this evidence is lacking. Methods: We searched Medline (PubMed), Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies that reported prevalence of (1) diagnosis of ARVC per 2010 Task Force Criteria and/or (2) sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in at least 10 family members of definite patients with ARVC. Results: We identified 41 studies, including 36 that reported diagnosis by Task Force Criteria and 22 VA. Meta-analysis of 1359 family members, from 13 unique cohorts showed an average prevalence estimate of 25% for diagnosis as per Task Force Criteria (95% CI, 0.15-0.35, I2=96.44%). Overall prevalence of VA among gene-positive family members was 18% (95% CI, 0.13-0.23, I2=33.25%) in 7 independent studies (n=597). Family genotype was a significant risk factor for diagnosis of both ARVC (odds ratio, 6.91 [95% CI, 1.27-37.70]; P=0.0005) and VA (odds ratio, 13.62 [95% CI, 0.91-204.13]; P=0.06). Male gender was not associated with disease prevalence (odds ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.72-1.95]; P=0.42) or VA (odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.51-1.29]; P=0.91). Conclusions: The prevalence of ARVC and VA in at-risk family members differs significantly based on family genotype. Although recent recommendations provide a guideline based only on age, we propose screening every 1 to 2 years for gene-positive family members and every 3 to 5 years for first-degree relatives of gene-elusive cases, as long as they are asymptomatic and not athletes.
KW - cardiomyopathy
KW - diagnosis
KW - family
KW - genotype
KW - prevalence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132455665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132455665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003530
DO - 10.1161/CIRCGEN.121.003530
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35579515
AN - SCOPUS:85132455665
SN - 1942-325X
VL - 15
SP - E003530
JO - Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine
JF - Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine
IS - 3
ER -