Are Surgical Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resections Improved at Teaching Hospitals?

Robert A. Meguid, Benjamin S. Brooke, David C. Chang, J. Timothy Sherwood, Malcolm V Brock, Stephen C Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Defining centers of excellence for complex surgical procedures, including pulmonary resection, reveals lower mortality at high-volume centers. We postulate that short-term outcome after lung cancer resection is better at teaching hospitals (TH) compared with nonteaching hospitals (non-TH), independent of volume. Methods: Lung cancer resections in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset from 1998 to 2004 were stratified by resection type (segmentectomy, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy). The TH identified in the NIS include those with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved general surgery (GSTH) and thoracic surgery (TSTH) residency programs. The association of hospital teaching status with in-hospital mortality was assessed by multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. Results: Of 46,951 lung resections (5,651 segmentectomies, 37,027 lobectomies, 4,273 pneumonectomies), 56% were performed at TH. Overall mortality was significantly lower at TH versus non-TH (3.2% vs 4.0%; p <0.001). Subgroup analysis for GSTH and TSTH confirmed this decrease. On multivariate regression, overall odds of death was independently reduced by 17% at TH versus non-TH (95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.93; p = 0.002). At TH, odds of death for pneumonectomy and lobectomy were significantly reduced independent of surgical volume, except for the latter at the highest hospital volume strata. Conclusions: In-hospital mortality is reduced for patients undergoing lung cancer resections at teaching hospitals, with results prominent at all but the highest volume institutions. Lower mortality rates persisted at GSTH and TSTH. Understanding and disseminating the processes of care associated with these settings may improve quality of care for lung cancer patients, and decrease patient bias against teaching hospitals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1015-1025
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Teaching Hospitals
Lung Neoplasms
Pneumonectomy
Segmental Mastectomy
Hospital Mortality
Pulmonary Surgical Procedures
Mortality
Inpatients
High-Volume Hospitals
Graduate Medical Education
Accreditation
Quality of Health Care
Internship and Residency
Thoracic Surgery
Comorbidity
Logistic Models
Demography
Confidence Intervals
Lung

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Are Surgical Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resections Improved at Teaching Hospitals? / Meguid, Robert A.; Brooke, Benjamin S.; Chang, David C.; Sherwood, J. Timothy; Brock, Malcolm V; Yang, Stephen C.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 85, No. 3, 03.2008, p. 1015-1025.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meguid, Robert A. ; Brooke, Benjamin S. ; Chang, David C. ; Sherwood, J. Timothy ; Brock, Malcolm V ; Yang, Stephen C. / Are Surgical Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resections Improved at Teaching Hospitals?. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2008 ; Vol. 85, No. 3. pp. 1015-1025.
@article{37b03cf5c66d442fb049f541768d61e9,
title = "Are Surgical Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resections Improved at Teaching Hospitals?",
abstract = "Background: Defining centers of excellence for complex surgical procedures, including pulmonary resection, reveals lower mortality at high-volume centers. We postulate that short-term outcome after lung cancer resection is better at teaching hospitals (TH) compared with nonteaching hospitals (non-TH), independent of volume. Methods: Lung cancer resections in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset from 1998 to 2004 were stratified by resection type (segmentectomy, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy). The TH identified in the NIS include those with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved general surgery (GSTH) and thoracic surgery (TSTH) residency programs. The association of hospital teaching status with in-hospital mortality was assessed by multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. Results: Of 46,951 lung resections (5,651 segmentectomies, 37,027 lobectomies, 4,273 pneumonectomies), 56{\%} were performed at TH. Overall mortality was significantly lower at TH versus non-TH (3.2{\%} vs 4.0{\%}; p <0.001). Subgroup analysis for GSTH and TSTH confirmed this decrease. On multivariate regression, overall odds of death was independently reduced by 17{\%} at TH versus non-TH (95{\%} confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.93; p = 0.002). At TH, odds of death for pneumonectomy and lobectomy were significantly reduced independent of surgical volume, except for the latter at the highest hospital volume strata. Conclusions: In-hospital mortality is reduced for patients undergoing lung cancer resections at teaching hospitals, with results prominent at all but the highest volume institutions. Lower mortality rates persisted at GSTH and TSTH. Understanding and disseminating the processes of care associated with these settings may improve quality of care for lung cancer patients, and decrease patient bias against teaching hospitals.",
author = "Meguid, {Robert A.} and Brooke, {Benjamin S.} and Chang, {David C.} and Sherwood, {J. Timothy} and Brock, {Malcolm V} and Yang, {Stephen C}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.09.046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1015--1025",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Surgical Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resections Improved at Teaching Hospitals?

AU - Meguid, Robert A.

AU - Brooke, Benjamin S.

AU - Chang, David C.

AU - Sherwood, J. Timothy

AU - Brock, Malcolm V

AU - Yang, Stephen C

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Background: Defining centers of excellence for complex surgical procedures, including pulmonary resection, reveals lower mortality at high-volume centers. We postulate that short-term outcome after lung cancer resection is better at teaching hospitals (TH) compared with nonteaching hospitals (non-TH), independent of volume. Methods: Lung cancer resections in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset from 1998 to 2004 were stratified by resection type (segmentectomy, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy). The TH identified in the NIS include those with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved general surgery (GSTH) and thoracic surgery (TSTH) residency programs. The association of hospital teaching status with in-hospital mortality was assessed by multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. Results: Of 46,951 lung resections (5,651 segmentectomies, 37,027 lobectomies, 4,273 pneumonectomies), 56% were performed at TH. Overall mortality was significantly lower at TH versus non-TH (3.2% vs 4.0%; p <0.001). Subgroup analysis for GSTH and TSTH confirmed this decrease. On multivariate regression, overall odds of death was independently reduced by 17% at TH versus non-TH (95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.93; p = 0.002). At TH, odds of death for pneumonectomy and lobectomy were significantly reduced independent of surgical volume, except for the latter at the highest hospital volume strata. Conclusions: In-hospital mortality is reduced for patients undergoing lung cancer resections at teaching hospitals, with results prominent at all but the highest volume institutions. Lower mortality rates persisted at GSTH and TSTH. Understanding and disseminating the processes of care associated with these settings may improve quality of care for lung cancer patients, and decrease patient bias against teaching hospitals.

AB - Background: Defining centers of excellence for complex surgical procedures, including pulmonary resection, reveals lower mortality at high-volume centers. We postulate that short-term outcome after lung cancer resection is better at teaching hospitals (TH) compared with nonteaching hospitals (non-TH), independent of volume. Methods: Lung cancer resections in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset from 1998 to 2004 were stratified by resection type (segmentectomy, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy). The TH identified in the NIS include those with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved general surgery (GSTH) and thoracic surgery (TSTH) residency programs. The association of hospital teaching status with in-hospital mortality was assessed by multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. Results: Of 46,951 lung resections (5,651 segmentectomies, 37,027 lobectomies, 4,273 pneumonectomies), 56% were performed at TH. Overall mortality was significantly lower at TH versus non-TH (3.2% vs 4.0%; p <0.001). Subgroup analysis for GSTH and TSTH confirmed this decrease. On multivariate regression, overall odds of death was independently reduced by 17% at TH versus non-TH (95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.93; p = 0.002). At TH, odds of death for pneumonectomy and lobectomy were significantly reduced independent of surgical volume, except for the latter at the highest hospital volume strata. Conclusions: In-hospital mortality is reduced for patients undergoing lung cancer resections at teaching hospitals, with results prominent at all but the highest volume institutions. Lower mortality rates persisted at GSTH and TSTH. Understanding and disseminating the processes of care associated with these settings may improve quality of care for lung cancer patients, and decrease patient bias against teaching hospitals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39149112508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39149112508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.09.046

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.09.046

M3 - Article

C2 - 18291190

AN - SCOPUS:39149112508

VL - 85

SP - 1015

EP - 1025

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 3

ER -