Are state child care regulations meeting national oral health and nutritional standards?

Juhee Kim, Linda M. Kaste, Shahrbanoo Fadavi, Sara E.Benjamin Neelon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review of US state child care center regulations on oral health and nutrition as related to early childhood caries (ECC). Methods: Child care center regulations for the 50 states and the District of Columbia, as of April 2010, were audited for their inclusion of 8 oral health and 11 nutrition topics related to the development of or care for ECC. The topics are based on selected recommended standards from Caring for Our Children: National Health and Safety Performance Standards; Guidelines for Out-of-Home Child Care Programs. Results: On average, states had 2.6 ( ±1.7 SD; range=0-6) of the oral health standards and 5.9 ( ±2.5; range=1-11) of the nutritional standards included in their regulations. States varied greatly on the content covered. Seven states did not include any of the reviewed oral health topics. The 2 least covered regulations for oral health were "toothbrush maintenance ́ (4 states) and ́oral health screening" (5 states). Conclusions: The weakness of coverage in child care center regulations for early childhood caries prevention calls to strengthen these policies for their potential to improve the oral health and obesity status of US children. (Pediatr Dent 2012;34:317-24) Received October 7, 2010 | Last Revision February 6, 2011 | Accepted February 9, 2011.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-324
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Dentistry
Volume34
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Child care centers
  • Dental caries
  • Infant
  • Nutrition policy
  • Preschool child

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Dentistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are state child care regulations meeting national oral health and nutritional standards?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this