Are semantic memory and episodic memory distinct systems?

Michael McCloskey, Jeffrey L. Santee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Discusses logical problems in a study by E. J. Shoben et al, who reported data concerning the semantic-episodic memory distinction proposed by E. Tulving (1962). The present article suggests that because of these problems their results do not provide strong evidence of a distinction between semantic and episodic memory systems. In addition, an experiment with 8 undergraduates is described. Results argue against the claim that the representation for semantic information is different from that for episodic information. It is suggested that the available data do not provide strong support for the view that semantic and episodic memory are distinct systems. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-71
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1981

Fingerprint

Episodic Memory
Semantics

Keywords

  • semantically high vs low related episodic sentences, recognition RT, college students, evidence against claim by E. J. Shoben et al concerning semantic-episodic memory distinction

Cite this

Are semantic memory and episodic memory distinct systems? / McCloskey, Michael; Santee, Jeffrey L.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.1981, p. 66-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCloskey, Michael ; Santee, Jeffrey L. / Are semantic memory and episodic memory distinct systems?. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 1981 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 66-71.
@article{a7b6c93010494e38b4350b0fca3d357c,
title = "Are semantic memory and episodic memory distinct systems?",
abstract = "Discusses logical problems in a study by E. J. Shoben et al, who reported data concerning the semantic-episodic memory distinction proposed by E. Tulving (1962). The present article suggests that because of these problems their results do not provide strong evidence of a distinction between semantic and episodic memory systems. In addition, an experiment with 8 undergraduates is described. Results argue against the claim that the representation for semantic information is different from that for episodic information. It is suggested that the available data do not provide strong support for the view that semantic and episodic memory are distinct systems. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "semantically high vs low related episodic sentences, recognition RT, college students, evidence against claim by E. J. Shoben et al concerning semantic-episodic memory distinction",
author = "Michael McCloskey and Santee, {Jeffrey L.}",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0278-7393.7.1.66",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "66--71",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory",
issn = "0096-1515",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are semantic memory and episodic memory distinct systems?

AU - McCloskey, Michael

AU - Santee, Jeffrey L.

PY - 1981/1

Y1 - 1981/1

N2 - Discusses logical problems in a study by E. J. Shoben et al, who reported data concerning the semantic-episodic memory distinction proposed by E. Tulving (1962). The present article suggests that because of these problems their results do not provide strong evidence of a distinction between semantic and episodic memory systems. In addition, an experiment with 8 undergraduates is described. Results argue against the claim that the representation for semantic information is different from that for episodic information. It is suggested that the available data do not provide strong support for the view that semantic and episodic memory are distinct systems. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Discusses logical problems in a study by E. J. Shoben et al, who reported data concerning the semantic-episodic memory distinction proposed by E. Tulving (1962). The present article suggests that because of these problems their results do not provide strong evidence of a distinction between semantic and episodic memory systems. In addition, an experiment with 8 undergraduates is described. Results argue against the claim that the representation for semantic information is different from that for episodic information. It is suggested that the available data do not provide strong support for the view that semantic and episodic memory are distinct systems. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - semantically high vs low related episodic sentences, recognition RT, college students, evidence against claim by E. J. Shoben et al concerning semantic-episodic memory distinction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042171831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042171831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-7393.7.1.66

DO - 10.1037/0278-7393.7.1.66

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0042171831

VL - 7

SP - 66

EP - 71

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

SN - 0096-1515

IS - 1

ER -