Are higher rates of depression in women accounted for by differential symptom reporting?

Hillary R. Bogner, Joseph J Gallo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. The gender difference in prevalence and incidence rates of depression is one of the most consistent findings in psychiatric epidemiology. We sought to examine whether any gender differences in symptom profile might account for this difference in rates. Method. This study was a population-based 13-year follow-up survey of community-dwelling adults living in East Baltimore in 1981. Subjects were the continuing participants of the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. Participants interviewed between 1993 and 1996 with complete data on depressive symptoms and covariates were included (n = 1,727). We applied structural equations with a measurement model for dichotomous data (the MIMIC - multiple indicators, multiple causes - model) to compare symptoms between women and men, in relation to the nine symptom groups comprising the diagnostic criteria for major depression, adjusting for several potentially influential characteristics (namely, age, self-reported ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and employment). Results. There were no significant gender differences in the self-report of depression symptoms even taking into account the higher level of depressive symptoms of women and the influence of other covariates. For example, women were no more likely to endorse sadness than were men, as evidenced by a direct effect coefficient that was not significantly different from the null [adjusted estimated direct effect of gender on report of sadness = 0.105, 95% confidence interval (-0. 113, 0.323)]. Conclusions. Men and women in this community sample reported similar patterns of depressive symptoms. No evidence that the presentation of depressive symptoms differs by gender was found.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-132
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Depression
gender-specific factors
Baltimore
gender
epidemiology
marital status
community
diagnostic
incidence
ethnicity
Independent Living
confidence
Marital Status
cause
Self Report
Psychiatry
Epidemiology
evidence
Confidence Intervals
Group

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Gender differences
  • Symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Are higher rates of depression in women accounted for by differential symptom reporting? / Bogner, Hillary R.; Gallo, Joseph J.

In: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 39, No. 2, 02.2004, p. 126-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3e7881793049438691eea04e76641404,
title = "Are higher rates of depression in women accounted for by differential symptom reporting?",
abstract = "Background. The gender difference in prevalence and incidence rates of depression is one of the most consistent findings in psychiatric epidemiology. We sought to examine whether any gender differences in symptom profile might account for this difference in rates. Method. This study was a population-based 13-year follow-up survey of community-dwelling adults living in East Baltimore in 1981. Subjects were the continuing participants of the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. Participants interviewed between 1993 and 1996 with complete data on depressive symptoms and covariates were included (n = 1,727). We applied structural equations with a measurement model for dichotomous data (the MIMIC - multiple indicators, multiple causes - model) to compare symptoms between women and men, in relation to the nine symptom groups comprising the diagnostic criteria for major depression, adjusting for several potentially influential characteristics (namely, age, self-reported ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and employment). Results. There were no significant gender differences in the self-report of depression symptoms even taking into account the higher level of depressive symptoms of women and the influence of other covariates. For example, women were no more likely to endorse sadness than were men, as evidenced by a direct effect coefficient that was not significantly different from the null [adjusted estimated direct effect of gender on report of sadness = 0.105, 95{\%} confidence interval (-0. 113, 0.323)]. Conclusions. Men and women in this community sample reported similar patterns of depressive symptoms. No evidence that the presentation of depressive symptoms differs by gender was found.",
keywords = "Depression, Gender differences, Symptoms",
author = "Bogner, {Hillary R.} and Gallo, {Joseph J}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00127-004-0714-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "126--132",
journal = "Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology",
issn = "0933-7954",
publisher = "D. Steinkopff-Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are higher rates of depression in women accounted for by differential symptom reporting?

AU - Bogner, Hillary R.

AU - Gallo, Joseph J

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - Background. The gender difference in prevalence and incidence rates of depression is one of the most consistent findings in psychiatric epidemiology. We sought to examine whether any gender differences in symptom profile might account for this difference in rates. Method. This study was a population-based 13-year follow-up survey of community-dwelling adults living in East Baltimore in 1981. Subjects were the continuing participants of the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. Participants interviewed between 1993 and 1996 with complete data on depressive symptoms and covariates were included (n = 1,727). We applied structural equations with a measurement model for dichotomous data (the MIMIC - multiple indicators, multiple causes - model) to compare symptoms between women and men, in relation to the nine symptom groups comprising the diagnostic criteria for major depression, adjusting for several potentially influential characteristics (namely, age, self-reported ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and employment). Results. There were no significant gender differences in the self-report of depression symptoms even taking into account the higher level of depressive symptoms of women and the influence of other covariates. For example, women were no more likely to endorse sadness than were men, as evidenced by a direct effect coefficient that was not significantly different from the null [adjusted estimated direct effect of gender on report of sadness = 0.105, 95% confidence interval (-0. 113, 0.323)]. Conclusions. Men and women in this community sample reported similar patterns of depressive symptoms. No evidence that the presentation of depressive symptoms differs by gender was found.

AB - Background. The gender difference in prevalence and incidence rates of depression is one of the most consistent findings in psychiatric epidemiology. We sought to examine whether any gender differences in symptom profile might account for this difference in rates. Method. This study was a population-based 13-year follow-up survey of community-dwelling adults living in East Baltimore in 1981. Subjects were the continuing participants of the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. Participants interviewed between 1993 and 1996 with complete data on depressive symptoms and covariates were included (n = 1,727). We applied structural equations with a measurement model for dichotomous data (the MIMIC - multiple indicators, multiple causes - model) to compare symptoms between women and men, in relation to the nine symptom groups comprising the diagnostic criteria for major depression, adjusting for several potentially influential characteristics (namely, age, self-reported ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and employment). Results. There were no significant gender differences in the self-report of depression symptoms even taking into account the higher level of depressive symptoms of women and the influence of other covariates. For example, women were no more likely to endorse sadness than were men, as evidenced by a direct effect coefficient that was not significantly different from the null [adjusted estimated direct effect of gender on report of sadness = 0.105, 95% confidence interval (-0. 113, 0.323)]. Conclusions. Men and women in this community sample reported similar patterns of depressive symptoms. No evidence that the presentation of depressive symptoms differs by gender was found.

KW - Depression

KW - Gender differences

KW - Symptoms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2142768318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2142768318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00127-004-0714-z

DO - 10.1007/s00127-004-0714-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 15052394

AN - SCOPUS:2142768318

VL - 39

SP - 126

EP - 132

JO - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

JF - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

SN - 0933-7954

IS - 2

ER -