Are constitutional delay of growth and familial short stature different conditions?

R. Lanes, P. A. Lee, L. P. Plotnick, A. A. Kowarski, C. J. Migeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Children between 2 and 4 standard deviations below the mean height for age with no specific cause to account for their short stature are usually considered to represent either constitutional delay of growth (CDG) or familial short stature (FSS). This study was undertaken to determine whether 167 patients who were referred to the clinic for short stature could be divided into two distinct populations that fit the criteria of CDG and FSS. When the patients were artificially divided into 2 subgroups based on skeletal age greater or less than 2 standard deviations below the mean, no significant difference in growth rates or midparental heights could be found between them. Height ages were significantly more delayed in the group with greater skeletal age delay. Midparental height of the total population of short children was less than the mean midparental height of normal American children. It was concluded that these patients did not distribute into these two clear-cut entities. Whether they represented one continuum or two largely overlapping populations could not be decided on the basis of data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-33
Number of pages3
JournalClinical Pediatrics
Volume19
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1980

Fingerprint

Growth
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Lanes, R., Lee, P. A., Plotnick, L. P., Kowarski, A. A., & Migeon, C. J. (1980). Are constitutional delay of growth and familial short stature different conditions? Clinical Pediatrics, 19(1), 31-33.

Are constitutional delay of growth and familial short stature different conditions? / Lanes, R.; Lee, P. A.; Plotnick, L. P.; Kowarski, A. A.; Migeon, C. J.

In: Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1980, p. 31-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lanes, R, Lee, PA, Plotnick, LP, Kowarski, AA & Migeon, CJ 1980, 'Are constitutional delay of growth and familial short stature different conditions?', Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31-33.
Lanes R, Lee PA, Plotnick LP, Kowarski AA, Migeon CJ. Are constitutional delay of growth and familial short stature different conditions? Clinical Pediatrics. 1980;19(1):31-33.
Lanes, R. ; Lee, P. A. ; Plotnick, L. P. ; Kowarski, A. A. ; Migeon, C. J. / Are constitutional delay of growth and familial short stature different conditions?. In: Clinical Pediatrics. 1980 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 31-33.
@article{6ad9d83510da4f0696b783b2eb82e089,
title = "Are constitutional delay of growth and familial short stature different conditions?",
abstract = "Children between 2 and 4 standard deviations below the mean height for age with no specific cause to account for their short stature are usually considered to represent either constitutional delay of growth (CDG) or familial short stature (FSS). This study was undertaken to determine whether 167 patients who were referred to the clinic for short stature could be divided into two distinct populations that fit the criteria of CDG and FSS. When the patients were artificially divided into 2 subgroups based on skeletal age greater or less than 2 standard deviations below the mean, no significant difference in growth rates or midparental heights could be found between them. Height ages were significantly more delayed in the group with greater skeletal age delay. Midparental height of the total population of short children was less than the mean midparental height of normal American children. It was concluded that these patients did not distribute into these two clear-cut entities. Whether they represented one continuum or two largely overlapping populations could not be decided on the basis of data.",
author = "R. Lanes and Lee, {P. A.} and Plotnick, {L. P.} and Kowarski, {A. A.} and Migeon, {C. J.}",
year = "1980",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "31--33",
journal = "Clinical Pediatrics",
issn = "0009-9228",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are constitutional delay of growth and familial short stature different conditions?

AU - Lanes, R.

AU - Lee, P. A.

AU - Plotnick, L. P.

AU - Kowarski, A. A.

AU - Migeon, C. J.

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - Children between 2 and 4 standard deviations below the mean height for age with no specific cause to account for their short stature are usually considered to represent either constitutional delay of growth (CDG) or familial short stature (FSS). This study was undertaken to determine whether 167 patients who were referred to the clinic for short stature could be divided into two distinct populations that fit the criteria of CDG and FSS. When the patients were artificially divided into 2 subgroups based on skeletal age greater or less than 2 standard deviations below the mean, no significant difference in growth rates or midparental heights could be found between them. Height ages were significantly more delayed in the group with greater skeletal age delay. Midparental height of the total population of short children was less than the mean midparental height of normal American children. It was concluded that these patients did not distribute into these two clear-cut entities. Whether they represented one continuum or two largely overlapping populations could not be decided on the basis of data.

AB - Children between 2 and 4 standard deviations below the mean height for age with no specific cause to account for their short stature are usually considered to represent either constitutional delay of growth (CDG) or familial short stature (FSS). This study was undertaken to determine whether 167 patients who were referred to the clinic for short stature could be divided into two distinct populations that fit the criteria of CDG and FSS. When the patients were artificially divided into 2 subgroups based on skeletal age greater or less than 2 standard deviations below the mean, no significant difference in growth rates or midparental heights could be found between them. Height ages were significantly more delayed in the group with greater skeletal age delay. Midparental height of the total population of short children was less than the mean midparental height of normal American children. It was concluded that these patients did not distribute into these two clear-cut entities. Whether they represented one continuum or two largely overlapping populations could not be decided on the basis of data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018922234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018922234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 31

EP - 33

JO - Clinical Pediatrics

JF - Clinical Pediatrics

SN - 0009-9228

IS - 1

ER -