Approach-avoidance coping conflict in a sample of burn patients at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder

James A Fauerbach, John W. Lawrence, Joshua Fogel, Linda Richter, Gina Magyar-Russell, Jodi B A McKibben, Una D McCann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Following an acute burn injury, higher distress is consistently observed among individuals exhibiting a conflict between approach coping (e.g., processing) and avoidance coping (e.g., suppression) relative to those individuals who use only one of these methods. Study objectives were to determine if contradictory coping messages would lead to such approach-avoidance coping conflict and to determine if experiment-induced coping conflict is also associated with higher distress. Methods: Participants (n=59 adults hospitalized with acute burn injuries) were assigned randomly to experimental conditions differing in the order in which training was provided in two ways of coping with posttrauma re-experiencing symptoms (i.e., process-then-suppress versus suppress-then-process). The primary dependent variable was coping behavior during the 24-hr posttraining period. Coping behavior was categorized as approach coping (processing), avoidance coping (suppressing), or approach-avoidance coping conflict (both) on the basis of median splits on subscales assessing these behaviors. Secondary analyses examined the relationship between this experiment-induced coping conflict and re-experiencing symptoms. Results: Results indicated that participants in the process-then-suppress condition, relative to the suppress-then-process condition, were significantly more likely to exhibit approach-avoidance coping conflict (i.e., above median split on both processing and suppressing) during the next 24 hr. Furthermore, approach-avoidance coping conflict was associated with greater re-experiencing symptoms assessed via self-report and by blinded coding of recorded speech. Conclusions: It is concluded that the order of coping skill training can influence treatment outcome, success of coping methods, and overall levels of distress. therefore, training in stabilizing and calming methods should precede training in active processing following stressful life events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)838-850
Number of pages13
JournalDepression and Anxiety
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Psychological Adaptation
Wounds and Injuries
Conflict (Psychology)
Self Report

Keywords

  • Burn injury
  • Contradictory messages
  • Emotion approach avoidance coping
  • PTSD
  • Re-experiencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Approach-avoidance coping conflict in a sample of burn patients at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder. / Fauerbach, James A; Lawrence, John W.; Fogel, Joshua; Richter, Linda; Magyar-Russell, Gina; McKibben, Jodi B A; McCann, Una D.

In: Depression and Anxiety, Vol. 26, No. 9, 09.2009, p. 838-850.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fauerbach, James A ; Lawrence, John W. ; Fogel, Joshua ; Richter, Linda ; Magyar-Russell, Gina ; McKibben, Jodi B A ; McCann, Una D. / Approach-avoidance coping conflict in a sample of burn patients at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Depression and Anxiety. 2009 ; Vol. 26, No. 9. pp. 838-850.
@article{77570c29bdde47a3aed8719e7bd0d66c,
title = "Approach-avoidance coping conflict in a sample of burn patients at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder",
abstract = "Background: Following an acute burn injury, higher distress is consistently observed among individuals exhibiting a conflict between approach coping (e.g., processing) and avoidance coping (e.g., suppression) relative to those individuals who use only one of these methods. Study objectives were to determine if contradictory coping messages would lead to such approach-avoidance coping conflict and to determine if experiment-induced coping conflict is also associated with higher distress. Methods: Participants (n=59 adults hospitalized with acute burn injuries) were assigned randomly to experimental conditions differing in the order in which training was provided in two ways of coping with posttrauma re-experiencing symptoms (i.e., process-then-suppress versus suppress-then-process). The primary dependent variable was coping behavior during the 24-hr posttraining period. Coping behavior was categorized as approach coping (processing), avoidance coping (suppressing), or approach-avoidance coping conflict (both) on the basis of median splits on subscales assessing these behaviors. Secondary analyses examined the relationship between this experiment-induced coping conflict and re-experiencing symptoms. Results: Results indicated that participants in the process-then-suppress condition, relative to the suppress-then-process condition, were significantly more likely to exhibit approach-avoidance coping conflict (i.e., above median split on both processing and suppressing) during the next 24 hr. Furthermore, approach-avoidance coping conflict was associated with greater re-experiencing symptoms assessed via self-report and by blinded coding of recorded speech. Conclusions: It is concluded that the order of coping skill training can influence treatment outcome, success of coping methods, and overall levels of distress. therefore, training in stabilizing and calming methods should precede training in active processing following stressful life events.",
keywords = "Burn injury, Contradictory messages, Emotion approach avoidance coping, PTSD, Re-experiencing",
author = "Fauerbach, {James A} and Lawrence, {John W.} and Joshua Fogel and Linda Richter and Gina Magyar-Russell and McKibben, {Jodi B A} and McCann, {Una D}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/da.20439",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "838--850",
journal = "Depression and Anxiety",
issn = "1091-4269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approach-avoidance coping conflict in a sample of burn patients at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder

AU - Fauerbach, James A

AU - Lawrence, John W.

AU - Fogel, Joshua

AU - Richter, Linda

AU - Magyar-Russell, Gina

AU - McKibben, Jodi B A

AU - McCann, Una D

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Background: Following an acute burn injury, higher distress is consistently observed among individuals exhibiting a conflict between approach coping (e.g., processing) and avoidance coping (e.g., suppression) relative to those individuals who use only one of these methods. Study objectives were to determine if contradictory coping messages would lead to such approach-avoidance coping conflict and to determine if experiment-induced coping conflict is also associated with higher distress. Methods: Participants (n=59 adults hospitalized with acute burn injuries) were assigned randomly to experimental conditions differing in the order in which training was provided in two ways of coping with posttrauma re-experiencing symptoms (i.e., process-then-suppress versus suppress-then-process). The primary dependent variable was coping behavior during the 24-hr posttraining period. Coping behavior was categorized as approach coping (processing), avoidance coping (suppressing), or approach-avoidance coping conflict (both) on the basis of median splits on subscales assessing these behaviors. Secondary analyses examined the relationship between this experiment-induced coping conflict and re-experiencing symptoms. Results: Results indicated that participants in the process-then-suppress condition, relative to the suppress-then-process condition, were significantly more likely to exhibit approach-avoidance coping conflict (i.e., above median split on both processing and suppressing) during the next 24 hr. Furthermore, approach-avoidance coping conflict was associated with greater re-experiencing symptoms assessed via self-report and by blinded coding of recorded speech. Conclusions: It is concluded that the order of coping skill training can influence treatment outcome, success of coping methods, and overall levels of distress. therefore, training in stabilizing and calming methods should precede training in active processing following stressful life events.

AB - Background: Following an acute burn injury, higher distress is consistently observed among individuals exhibiting a conflict between approach coping (e.g., processing) and avoidance coping (e.g., suppression) relative to those individuals who use only one of these methods. Study objectives were to determine if contradictory coping messages would lead to such approach-avoidance coping conflict and to determine if experiment-induced coping conflict is also associated with higher distress. Methods: Participants (n=59 adults hospitalized with acute burn injuries) were assigned randomly to experimental conditions differing in the order in which training was provided in two ways of coping with posttrauma re-experiencing symptoms (i.e., process-then-suppress versus suppress-then-process). The primary dependent variable was coping behavior during the 24-hr posttraining period. Coping behavior was categorized as approach coping (processing), avoidance coping (suppressing), or approach-avoidance coping conflict (both) on the basis of median splits on subscales assessing these behaviors. Secondary analyses examined the relationship between this experiment-induced coping conflict and re-experiencing symptoms. Results: Results indicated that participants in the process-then-suppress condition, relative to the suppress-then-process condition, were significantly more likely to exhibit approach-avoidance coping conflict (i.e., above median split on both processing and suppressing) during the next 24 hr. Furthermore, approach-avoidance coping conflict was associated with greater re-experiencing symptoms assessed via self-report and by blinded coding of recorded speech. Conclusions: It is concluded that the order of coping skill training can influence treatment outcome, success of coping methods, and overall levels of distress. therefore, training in stabilizing and calming methods should precede training in active processing following stressful life events.

KW - Burn injury

KW - Contradictory messages

KW - Emotion approach avoidance coping

KW - PTSD

KW - Re-experiencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349113934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349113934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/da.20439

DO - 10.1002/da.20439

M3 - Article

C2 - 19170120

AN - SCOPUS:70349113934

VL - 26

SP - 838

EP - 850

JO - Depression and Anxiety

JF - Depression and Anxiety

SN - 1091-4269

IS - 9

ER -