Applying the common rule to public health agencies: Questions and tentative answers about a separate regulatory regime

Scott Burris, James Buehler, Zita Lazzarini

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

This article considers the case for exempting public health agencies from the Common Rule system protecting human subjects of research. It finds the case reasonable, and suggests that Grafting such an alternative system for public health agencies could suggest ways to improve the Common Rule in other areas of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)638-653
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume31
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Health Systems Agencies
Public Health
public health
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Applying the common rule to public health agencies : Questions and tentative answers about a separate regulatory regime. / Burris, Scott; Buehler, James; Lazzarini, Zita.

In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 31, No. 4, 12.2003, p. 638-653.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Burris, S, Buehler, J & Lazzarini, Z 2003, 'Applying the common rule to public health agencies: Questions and tentative answers about a separate regulatory regime', Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 638-653.
Burris S, Buehler J, Lazzarini Z. Applying the common rule to public health agencies: Questions and tentative answers about a separate regulatory regime. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 2003 Dec;31(4):638-653.
Burris, Scott ; Buehler, James ; Lazzarini, Zita. / Applying the common rule to public health agencies : Questions and tentative answers about a separate regulatory regime. In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 2003 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 638-653.
@article{e590bb47641e4d65b98d8cb7718aee69,
title = "Applying the common rule to public health agencies: Questions and tentative answers about a separate regulatory regime",
abstract = "This article considers the case for exempting public health agencies from the Common Rule system protecting human subjects of research. It finds the case reasonable, and suggests that Grafting such an alternative system for public health agencies could suggest ways to improve the Common Rule in other areas of research.",
author = "Scott Burris and James Buehler and Zita Lazzarini",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "638--653",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying the common rule to public health agencies

T2 - Questions and tentative answers about a separate regulatory regime

AU - Burris, Scott

AU - Buehler, James

AU - Lazzarini, Zita

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - This article considers the case for exempting public health agencies from the Common Rule system protecting human subjects of research. It finds the case reasonable, and suggests that Grafting such an alternative system for public health agencies could suggest ways to improve the Common Rule in other areas of research.

AB - This article considers the case for exempting public health agencies from the Common Rule system protecting human subjects of research. It finds the case reasonable, and suggests that Grafting such an alternative system for public health agencies could suggest ways to improve the Common Rule in other areas of research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542610243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542610243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14968666

AN - SCOPUS:1542610243

VL - 31

SP - 638

EP - 653

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 4

ER -

Access to Document