Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces: An antisaccade study

M. L. Reinholdt-Dunne, K. Mogg, V. Benson, B. P. Bradley, M. G. Hardin, S. P. Liversedge, D. S. Pine, M. Ernst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cognitive models of anxiety propose that anxiety is associated with an attentional bias for threat, which increases vulnerability to emotional distress and is difficult to control. The study aim was to investigate relationships between the effects of threatening information, anxiety, and attention control on eye movements. High and low trait anxious individuals performed antisaccade and prosaccade tasks with angry, fearful, happy, and neutral faces. Results indicated that high-anxious participants showed a greater antisaccade cost for angry than neutral faces (i.e., relatively slower to look away from angry faces), compared with low-anxious individuals. This bias was not found for fearful or happy faces. The bias for angry faces was not related to individual differences in attention control assessed on self-report and behavioural measures. Findings support the view that anxiety is associated with difficulty in using cognitive control resources to inhibit attentional orienting to angry faces, and that attention control is multifaceted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-65
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Eye Movements
Individuality
Self Report
Selective Attention
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Angry faces
  • Antisaccade
  • Anxiety
  • Selective attention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L., Mogg, K., Benson, V., Bradley, B. P., Hardin, M. G., Liversedge, S. P., ... Ernst, M. (2012). Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces: An antisaccade study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.560111

Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces : An antisaccade study. / Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L.; Mogg, K.; Benson, V.; Bradley, B. P.; Hardin, M. G.; Liversedge, S. P.; Pine, D. S.; Ernst, M.

In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.02.2012, p. 54-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reinholdt-Dunne, ML, Mogg, K, Benson, V, Bradley, BP, Hardin, MG, Liversedge, SP, Pine, DS & Ernst, M 2012, 'Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces: An antisaccade study', Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.560111
Reinholdt-Dunne ML, Mogg K, Benson V, Bradley BP, Hardin MG, Liversedge SP et al. Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces: An antisaccade study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2012 Feb 1;24(1):54-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.560111
Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L. ; Mogg, K. ; Benson, V. ; Bradley, B. P. ; Hardin, M. G. ; Liversedge, S. P. ; Pine, D. S. ; Ernst, M. / Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces : An antisaccade study. In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 54-65.
@article{1b292dadd5e74441b3ed8746a92ab1aa,
title = "Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces: An antisaccade study",
abstract = "Cognitive models of anxiety propose that anxiety is associated with an attentional bias for threat, which increases vulnerability to emotional distress and is difficult to control. The study aim was to investigate relationships between the effects of threatening information, anxiety, and attention control on eye movements. High and low trait anxious individuals performed antisaccade and prosaccade tasks with angry, fearful, happy, and neutral faces. Results indicated that high-anxious participants showed a greater antisaccade cost for angry than neutral faces (i.e., relatively slower to look away from angry faces), compared with low-anxious individuals. This bias was not found for fearful or happy faces. The bias for angry faces was not related to individual differences in attention control assessed on self-report and behavioural measures. Findings support the view that anxiety is associated with difficulty in using cognitive control resources to inhibit attentional orienting to angry faces, and that attention control is multifaceted.",
keywords = "Angry faces, Antisaccade, Anxiety, Selective attention",
author = "Reinholdt-Dunne, {M. L.} and K. Mogg and V. Benson and Bradley, {B. P.} and Hardin, {M. G.} and Liversedge, {S. P.} and Pine, {D. S.} and M. Ernst",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/20445911.2011.560111",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "54--65",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "2044-5911",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces

T2 - An antisaccade study

AU - Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L.

AU - Mogg, K.

AU - Benson, V.

AU - Bradley, B. P.

AU - Hardin, M. G.

AU - Liversedge, S. P.

AU - Pine, D. S.

AU - Ernst, M.

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Cognitive models of anxiety propose that anxiety is associated with an attentional bias for threat, which increases vulnerability to emotional distress and is difficult to control. The study aim was to investigate relationships between the effects of threatening information, anxiety, and attention control on eye movements. High and low trait anxious individuals performed antisaccade and prosaccade tasks with angry, fearful, happy, and neutral faces. Results indicated that high-anxious participants showed a greater antisaccade cost for angry than neutral faces (i.e., relatively slower to look away from angry faces), compared with low-anxious individuals. This bias was not found for fearful or happy faces. The bias for angry faces was not related to individual differences in attention control assessed on self-report and behavioural measures. Findings support the view that anxiety is associated with difficulty in using cognitive control resources to inhibit attentional orienting to angry faces, and that attention control is multifaceted.

AB - Cognitive models of anxiety propose that anxiety is associated with an attentional bias for threat, which increases vulnerability to emotional distress and is difficult to control. The study aim was to investigate relationships between the effects of threatening information, anxiety, and attention control on eye movements. High and low trait anxious individuals performed antisaccade and prosaccade tasks with angry, fearful, happy, and neutral faces. Results indicated that high-anxious participants showed a greater antisaccade cost for angry than neutral faces (i.e., relatively slower to look away from angry faces), compared with low-anxious individuals. This bias was not found for fearful or happy faces. The bias for angry faces was not related to individual differences in attention control assessed on self-report and behavioural measures. Findings support the view that anxiety is associated with difficulty in using cognitive control resources to inhibit attentional orienting to angry faces, and that attention control is multifaceted.

KW - Angry faces

KW - Antisaccade

KW - Anxiety

KW - Selective attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856364638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856364638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/20445911.2011.560111

DO - 10.1080/20445911.2011.560111

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856364638

VL - 24

SP - 54

EP - 65

JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 2044-5911

IS - 1

ER -