Antagonist effects of nalbuphine in opioid-dependent human volunteers

K. L. Preston, G. E. Bigelow, I. A. Liebson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

The subjective, physiological and behavioral effects of nalbuphine, an opioid mixed agonist/antagonist analgesic, naloxone and hydromorphone were studied on adult, male, methadone-dependent volunteers living on a clinical research ward. The purpose was to assess nalbuphine's agonist properties vs. antagonist properties relative to a standard agonist (hydromorphone) and a standard antagonist (naloxone) in opioid-dependent subjects. Drug conditions included saline placebo, nalbuphine hydrochloride (0.375, 0.75, 1.5, 3 and 6 mg), naloxone hydrochloride (0.1 and 0.2 mg) and hydromorphone hydrochloride (4 and 8 mg). Drug conditions, given by i.m. injection, were tested in five subjects under double-blind conditions in 2.5 hr experimental sessions. Physiologic measures were monitored continuously before and for 2 hr after drug administration; pupil diameter and subject- and observer-rated behavioral responses were measured intermittently over this same period. Hydromorphone increased ratings significantly on subjective measures typical of morphine-like effects. Naloxone precipitated opioid abstinence which was measurable on several subject- and observer-rated behavioral measures and physiological measures. Nalbuphine produced effects which were qualitatively similar to the effects of naloxone and showed no evidence of opioid agonist effects in these methadone-dependent subjects. The withdrawal syndrome precipitated by nalbuphine was indistinguishable from that produced by naloxone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)929-937
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Volume248
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1989

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antagonist effects of nalbuphine in opioid-dependent human volunteers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this