Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees

Alison Snow Jones, Andrea Gielen, Jacquelyn C Campbell, Janet Schollenberger, Jacqueline A. Dienemann, Joan Kub, Patricia J. O'Campo, E. Clifford Wynne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Self-reported data from a survey of roughly 1,100 female health maintenance organization enrollees in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area are used to investigate the lifetime and annual prevalence of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by intimate partners. The sample consists of a racially balanced and, for the most part, well-educated group of working women. Three dimensions of abuse based on responses to questions from a modified version of the Abuse Assessment Screen are employed. In addition to simple descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed. The estimated annual prevalence is lower than estimates reported in other studies. However, lifetime prevalence is very similar to estimates found in primary care clinical samples and somewhat higher than those derived from population-based surveys. More highly educated women report the lowest lifetime prevalence of intimate partner abuse. The finding that this sample of well-educated, middle-class working women has lifetime prevalence rates similar to those of women who are not as well off demonstrates that intimate partner abuse is not limited to disadvantaged women from vulnerable population subgroups. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-305
Number of pages11
JournalWomen's Health Issues
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1999

Fingerprint

Spouse Abuse
Health Maintenance Organizations
abuse
working woman
Working Women
Vulnerable Populations
sexual violence
middle class
Sex Offenses
agglomeration area
logistics
Primary Health Care
organization
regression
Logistic Models
health
Group
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees. / Snow Jones, Alison; Gielen, Andrea; Campbell, Jacquelyn C; Schollenberger, Janet; Dienemann, Jacqueline A.; Kub, Joan; O'Campo, Patricia J.; Wynne, E. Clifford.

In: Women's Health Issues, Vol. 9, No. 6, 11.1999, p. 295-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Snow Jones, A, Gielen, A, Campbell, JC, Schollenberger, J, Dienemann, JA, Kub, J, O'Campo, PJ & Wynne, EC 1999, 'Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees', Women's Health Issues, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-3867(99)00022-5
Snow Jones, Alison ; Gielen, Andrea ; Campbell, Jacquelyn C ; Schollenberger, Janet ; Dienemann, Jacqueline A. ; Kub, Joan ; O'Campo, Patricia J. ; Wynne, E. Clifford. / Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees. In: Women's Health Issues. 1999 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 295-305.
@article{f9b503e3147d4cc787558d2ac58b17fd,
title = "Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees",
abstract = "Self-reported data from a survey of roughly 1,100 female health maintenance organization enrollees in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area are used to investigate the lifetime and annual prevalence of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by intimate partners. The sample consists of a racially balanced and, for the most part, well-educated group of working women. Three dimensions of abuse based on responses to questions from a modified version of the Abuse Assessment Screen are employed. In addition to simple descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed. The estimated annual prevalence is lower than estimates reported in other studies. However, lifetime prevalence is very similar to estimates found in primary care clinical samples and somewhat higher than those derived from population-based surveys. More highly educated women report the lowest lifetime prevalence of intimate partner abuse. The finding that this sample of well-educated, middle-class working women has lifetime prevalence rates similar to those of women who are not as well off demonstrates that intimate partner abuse is not limited to disadvantaged women from vulnerable population subgroups. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.",
author = "{Snow Jones}, Alison and Andrea Gielen and Campbell, {Jacquelyn C} and Janet Schollenberger and Dienemann, {Jacqueline A.} and Joan Kub and O'Campo, {Patricia J.} and Wynne, {E. Clifford}",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S1049-3867(99)00022-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "295--305",
journal = "Women's Health Issues",
issn = "1049-3867",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees

AU - Snow Jones, Alison

AU - Gielen, Andrea

AU - Campbell, Jacquelyn C

AU - Schollenberger, Janet

AU - Dienemann, Jacqueline A.

AU - Kub, Joan

AU - O'Campo, Patricia J.

AU - Wynne, E. Clifford

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - Self-reported data from a survey of roughly 1,100 female health maintenance organization enrollees in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area are used to investigate the lifetime and annual prevalence of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by intimate partners. The sample consists of a racially balanced and, for the most part, well-educated group of working women. Three dimensions of abuse based on responses to questions from a modified version of the Abuse Assessment Screen are employed. In addition to simple descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed. The estimated annual prevalence is lower than estimates reported in other studies. However, lifetime prevalence is very similar to estimates found in primary care clinical samples and somewhat higher than those derived from population-based surveys. More highly educated women report the lowest lifetime prevalence of intimate partner abuse. The finding that this sample of well-educated, middle-class working women has lifetime prevalence rates similar to those of women who are not as well off demonstrates that intimate partner abuse is not limited to disadvantaged women from vulnerable population subgroups. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.

AB - Self-reported data from a survey of roughly 1,100 female health maintenance organization enrollees in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area are used to investigate the lifetime and annual prevalence of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by intimate partners. The sample consists of a racially balanced and, for the most part, well-educated group of working women. Three dimensions of abuse based on responses to questions from a modified version of the Abuse Assessment Screen are employed. In addition to simple descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed. The estimated annual prevalence is lower than estimates reported in other studies. However, lifetime prevalence is very similar to estimates found in primary care clinical samples and somewhat higher than those derived from population-based surveys. More highly educated women report the lowest lifetime prevalence of intimate partner abuse. The finding that this sample of well-educated, middle-class working women has lifetime prevalence rates similar to those of women who are not as well off demonstrates that intimate partner abuse is not limited to disadvantaged women from vulnerable population subgroups. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032713379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032713379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1049-3867(99)00022-5

DO - 10.1016/S1049-3867(99)00022-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032713379

VL - 9

SP - 295

EP - 305

JO - Women's Health Issues

JF - Women's Health Issues

SN - 1049-3867

IS - 6

ER -