Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings: Correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound

Robert Dragu, Arthur Kerner, Luis Gruberg, Shmuel Rispler, Jonathan Lessick, Eduard Ghersin, Diana Litmanovich, Ahuva Engel, Rafael Beyar, Ariel Roguin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Angiographic assessment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is often difficult and unreliable. To date, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used to determine the significance of lesions in patients with LMCA stenosis of uncertain significance. We aimed to prospectively show the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to assess LMCA luminal and plaque dimensions, and to characterize atherosclerotic plaque, as compared to IVUS and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), in patients with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis. Methods: Twenty patients, with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis, underwent coronary evaluation with IVUS, QCA and 16-slice MDCT. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA), lumen area stenosis (LAS) and plaque burden (PB) were assessed. Results: The MLD (median [interquartile range]) was 3.2 mm (2.5-3.7) by IVUS, 2.8 mm (2.3-3.3) by QCA (r = 0.52, P <0.05), and 2.8 mm (2.5-3.8) by MDCT (r = 0.77, P <0.01). MDCT estimated MLA as 10.7 mm2 (7.1-12.6) Vs. 9.9 mm2 (6.5-13.5) by IVUS (r = 0.93, P <0.01). Very high correlations were observed between MDCT and IVUS in assessing LAS (mean ± SD) (25.8 ± 19.1% and 29.0 ± 24.9% respectively, r = 0.83, P <0.01), and PB (49.2 ± 15.8% and 49.2 ± 19.7% respectively, r = 0.94, P <0.01). MDCT assigned plaque as being non-calcified with a sensitivity of 100%, while calcified plaques with a sensitivity of 75%. Conclusion: A high degree of correlation was found between MDCT and IVUS regarding the assessment of minimal lumen diameter and area, lumen area stenosis and plaque burden as well as plaque characterization in patients with angiographically borderline LMCA stenosis. Therefore, in patients selected for non-invasive coronary tree evaluation, MDCT may provide a valuable tool for the assessment, decision-making and follow-up of patients with uncertain LMCA disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-563
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Multidetector Computed Tomography
Coronary Vessels
Coronary Stenosis
Coronary Angiography
Pathologic Constriction
Atherosclerotic Plaques
Coronary Artery Disease
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Angiography
  • Coronary artery disease
  • CT
  • Decision making
  • Imaging
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings : Correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound. / Dragu, Robert; Kerner, Arthur; Gruberg, Luis; Rispler, Shmuel; Lessick, Jonathan; Ghersin, Eduard; Litmanovich, Diana; Engel, Ahuva; Beyar, Rafael; Roguin, Ariel.

In: International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, Vol. 24, No. 5, 06.2008, p. 557-563.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dragu, R, Kerner, A, Gruberg, L, Rispler, S, Lessick, J, Ghersin, E, Litmanovich, D, Engel, A, Beyar, R & Roguin, A 2008, 'Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings: Correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound', International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-007-9290-0
Dragu, Robert ; Kerner, Arthur ; Gruberg, Luis ; Rispler, Shmuel ; Lessick, Jonathan ; Ghersin, Eduard ; Litmanovich, Diana ; Engel, Ahuva ; Beyar, Rafael ; Roguin, Ariel. / Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings : Correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound. In: International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2008 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 557-563.
@article{ed49eb5a301548e89350dfc1eb88d69a,
title = "Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings: Correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound",
abstract = "Background: Angiographic assessment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is often difficult and unreliable. To date, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used to determine the significance of lesions in patients with LMCA stenosis of uncertain significance. We aimed to prospectively show the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to assess LMCA luminal and plaque dimensions, and to characterize atherosclerotic plaque, as compared to IVUS and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), in patients with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis. Methods: Twenty patients, with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis, underwent coronary evaluation with IVUS, QCA and 16-slice MDCT. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA), lumen area stenosis (LAS) and plaque burden (PB) were assessed. Results: The MLD (median [interquartile range]) was 3.2 mm (2.5-3.7) by IVUS, 2.8 mm (2.3-3.3) by QCA (r = 0.52, P <0.05), and 2.8 mm (2.5-3.8) by MDCT (r = 0.77, P <0.01). MDCT estimated MLA as 10.7 mm2 (7.1-12.6) Vs. 9.9 mm2 (6.5-13.5) by IVUS (r = 0.93, P <0.01). Very high correlations were observed between MDCT and IVUS in assessing LAS (mean ± SD) (25.8 ± 19.1{\%} and 29.0 ± 24.9{\%} respectively, r = 0.83, P <0.01), and PB (49.2 ± 15.8{\%} and 49.2 ± 19.7{\%} respectively, r = 0.94, P <0.01). MDCT assigned plaque as being non-calcified with a sensitivity of 100{\%}, while calcified plaques with a sensitivity of 75{\%}. Conclusion: A high degree of correlation was found between MDCT and IVUS regarding the assessment of minimal lumen diameter and area, lumen area stenosis and plaque burden as well as plaque characterization in patients with angiographically borderline LMCA stenosis. Therefore, in patients selected for non-invasive coronary tree evaluation, MDCT may provide a valuable tool for the assessment, decision-making and follow-up of patients with uncertain LMCA disease.",
keywords = "Angiography, Coronary artery disease, CT, Decision making, Imaging, Ultrasound",
author = "Robert Dragu and Arthur Kerner and Luis Gruberg and Shmuel Rispler and Jonathan Lessick and Eduard Ghersin and Diana Litmanovich and Ahuva Engel and Rafael Beyar and Ariel Roguin",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10554-007-9290-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "557--563",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging",
issn = "1569-5794",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings

T2 - Correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound

AU - Dragu, Robert

AU - Kerner, Arthur

AU - Gruberg, Luis

AU - Rispler, Shmuel

AU - Lessick, Jonathan

AU - Ghersin, Eduard

AU - Litmanovich, Diana

AU - Engel, Ahuva

AU - Beyar, Rafael

AU - Roguin, Ariel

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Background: Angiographic assessment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is often difficult and unreliable. To date, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used to determine the significance of lesions in patients with LMCA stenosis of uncertain significance. We aimed to prospectively show the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to assess LMCA luminal and plaque dimensions, and to characterize atherosclerotic plaque, as compared to IVUS and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), in patients with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis. Methods: Twenty patients, with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis, underwent coronary evaluation with IVUS, QCA and 16-slice MDCT. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA), lumen area stenosis (LAS) and plaque burden (PB) were assessed. Results: The MLD (median [interquartile range]) was 3.2 mm (2.5-3.7) by IVUS, 2.8 mm (2.3-3.3) by QCA (r = 0.52, P <0.05), and 2.8 mm (2.5-3.8) by MDCT (r = 0.77, P <0.01). MDCT estimated MLA as 10.7 mm2 (7.1-12.6) Vs. 9.9 mm2 (6.5-13.5) by IVUS (r = 0.93, P <0.01). Very high correlations were observed between MDCT and IVUS in assessing LAS (mean ± SD) (25.8 ± 19.1% and 29.0 ± 24.9% respectively, r = 0.83, P <0.01), and PB (49.2 ± 15.8% and 49.2 ± 19.7% respectively, r = 0.94, P <0.01). MDCT assigned plaque as being non-calcified with a sensitivity of 100%, while calcified plaques with a sensitivity of 75%. Conclusion: A high degree of correlation was found between MDCT and IVUS regarding the assessment of minimal lumen diameter and area, lumen area stenosis and plaque burden as well as plaque characterization in patients with angiographically borderline LMCA stenosis. Therefore, in patients selected for non-invasive coronary tree evaluation, MDCT may provide a valuable tool for the assessment, decision-making and follow-up of patients with uncertain LMCA disease.

AB - Background: Angiographic assessment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is often difficult and unreliable. To date, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used to determine the significance of lesions in patients with LMCA stenosis of uncertain significance. We aimed to prospectively show the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to assess LMCA luminal and plaque dimensions, and to characterize atherosclerotic plaque, as compared to IVUS and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), in patients with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis. Methods: Twenty patients, with angiographically uncertain LMCA stenosis, underwent coronary evaluation with IVUS, QCA and 16-slice MDCT. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA), lumen area stenosis (LAS) and plaque burden (PB) were assessed. Results: The MLD (median [interquartile range]) was 3.2 mm (2.5-3.7) by IVUS, 2.8 mm (2.3-3.3) by QCA (r = 0.52, P <0.05), and 2.8 mm (2.5-3.8) by MDCT (r = 0.77, P <0.01). MDCT estimated MLA as 10.7 mm2 (7.1-12.6) Vs. 9.9 mm2 (6.5-13.5) by IVUS (r = 0.93, P <0.01). Very high correlations were observed between MDCT and IVUS in assessing LAS (mean ± SD) (25.8 ± 19.1% and 29.0 ± 24.9% respectively, r = 0.83, P <0.01), and PB (49.2 ± 15.8% and 49.2 ± 19.7% respectively, r = 0.94, P <0.01). MDCT assigned plaque as being non-calcified with a sensitivity of 100%, while calcified plaques with a sensitivity of 75%. Conclusion: A high degree of correlation was found between MDCT and IVUS regarding the assessment of minimal lumen diameter and area, lumen area stenosis and plaque burden as well as plaque characterization in patients with angiographically borderline LMCA stenosis. Therefore, in patients selected for non-invasive coronary tree evaluation, MDCT may provide a valuable tool for the assessment, decision-making and follow-up of patients with uncertain LMCA disease.

KW - Angiography

KW - Coronary artery disease

KW - CT

KW - Decision making

KW - Imaging

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43449086724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43449086724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10554-007-9290-0

DO - 10.1007/s10554-007-9290-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 18165931

AN - SCOPUS:43449086724

VL - 24

SP - 557

EP - 563

JO - International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

JF - International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

SN - 1569-5794

IS - 5

ER -