Ancillary care in public health intervention research in low-resource settings: Researchers' practices and decision-making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

LITTLE IS KNOWN ABOUT RESEARCHERS' practices regarding the provision of ancillary care (AC) in public health intervention studies they have conducted and the factors that influence their decisions about whether to provide ancillary care in low-resource settings. We conducted 52 in-person in-depth interviews with public health researchers. Data analysis was iterative and led to the identification of themes and patterns among themes. We found that researchers who conduct their research in the community setting are more likely to identify and plan for the AC needs of potential research subjects before a study begins, whereas those affiliated with a permanent facility are more likely to deliver AC to research subjects on an ad hoc basis. Our findings suggest that on the whole, at least for public health intervention research in low-resource settings, researchers conducting research in the community setting confront more complex ethical and operational challenges in their decision-making about AC than do researchers conducting facility-based studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-81
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Public health
Decision Making
Public Health
public health
Decision making
Research Personnel
decision making
Research Subjects
Research
resources
community
data analysis
Interviews
human being
interview

Keywords

  • Ancillary care
  • Decision-making
  • Low-resource settings
  • Public health research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Communication
  • Social Psychology
  • Law

Cite this

@article{c92520f0ef9145f7bbd31db8233b8717,
title = "Ancillary care in public health intervention research in low-resource settings: Researchers' practices and decision-making",
abstract = "LITTLE IS KNOWN ABOUT RESEARCHERS' practices regarding the provision of ancillary care (AC) in public health intervention studies they have conducted and the factors that influence their decisions about whether to provide ancillary care in low-resource settings. We conducted 52 in-person in-depth interviews with public health researchers. Data analysis was iterative and led to the identification of themes and patterns among themes. We found that researchers who conduct their research in the community setting are more likely to identify and plan for the AC needs of potential research subjects before a study begins, whereas those affiliated with a permanent facility are more likely to deliver AC to research subjects on an ad hoc basis. Our findings suggest that on the whole, at least for public health intervention research in low-resource settings, researchers conducting research in the community setting confront more complex ethical and operational challenges in their decision-making about AC than do researchers conducting facility-based studies.",
keywords = "Ancillary care, Decision-making, Low-resource settings, Public health research",
author = "Holly Taylor and Maria Merritt and Mullany, {Luke C}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.73",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "73--81",
journal = "Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics",
issn = "1556-2646",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ancillary care in public health intervention research in low-resource settings

T2 - Researchers' practices and decision-making

AU - Taylor, Holly

AU - Merritt, Maria

AU - Mullany, Luke C

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - LITTLE IS KNOWN ABOUT RESEARCHERS' practices regarding the provision of ancillary care (AC) in public health intervention studies they have conducted and the factors that influence their decisions about whether to provide ancillary care in low-resource settings. We conducted 52 in-person in-depth interviews with public health researchers. Data analysis was iterative and led to the identification of themes and patterns among themes. We found that researchers who conduct their research in the community setting are more likely to identify and plan for the AC needs of potential research subjects before a study begins, whereas those affiliated with a permanent facility are more likely to deliver AC to research subjects on an ad hoc basis. Our findings suggest that on the whole, at least for public health intervention research in low-resource settings, researchers conducting research in the community setting confront more complex ethical and operational challenges in their decision-making about AC than do researchers conducting facility-based studies.

AB - LITTLE IS KNOWN ABOUT RESEARCHERS' practices regarding the provision of ancillary care (AC) in public health intervention studies they have conducted and the factors that influence their decisions about whether to provide ancillary care in low-resource settings. We conducted 52 in-person in-depth interviews with public health researchers. Data analysis was iterative and led to the identification of themes and patterns among themes. We found that researchers who conduct their research in the community setting are more likely to identify and plan for the AC needs of potential research subjects before a study begins, whereas those affiliated with a permanent facility are more likely to deliver AC to research subjects on an ad hoc basis. Our findings suggest that on the whole, at least for public health intervention research in low-resource settings, researchers conducting research in the community setting confront more complex ethical and operational challenges in their decision-making about AC than do researchers conducting facility-based studies.

KW - Ancillary care

KW - Decision-making

KW - Low-resource settings

KW - Public health research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053158753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053158753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.73

DO - 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.73

M3 - Article

C2 - 21931240

AN - SCOPUS:80053158753

VL - 6

SP - 73

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

JF - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

SN - 1556-2646

IS - 3

ER -