Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease

Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making

K. Lance Gould, Nils P. Johnson, Timothy M. Bateman, Rob S. Beanlands, Frank M. Bengel, Robert Bober, Paolo G. Camici, Manuel D. Cerqueira, Benjamin J W Chow, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Sharmila Dorbala, Henry Gewirtz, Robert J. Gropler, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Paul Knaapen, Juhani Knuuti, Michael E. Merhige, K. Peter Rentrop, Terrence D. Ruddy, Heinrich R. Schelbert & 8 others Thomas H. Schindler, Markus Schwaiger, Stefano Sdringola, John Vitarello, Kim A. Williams, Donald Gordon, Vasken Dilsizian, Jagat Narula

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology - pressure and flow - as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts that hold true for whatever technology measures coronary physiology directly and reliably, here focusing on positron emission tomography and its interplay with intracoronary measurements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1639-1653
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume62
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 29 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Positron-Emission Tomography
Coronary Artery Disease
Decision Making
Pressure
Coronary Stenosis
Technology

Keywords

  • coronary flow
  • coronary physiology
  • ischemia
  • PET perfusion imaging
  • revascularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease : Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. / Gould, K. Lance; Johnson, Nils P.; Bateman, Timothy M.; Beanlands, Rob S.; Bengel, Frank M.; Bober, Robert; Camici, Paolo G.; Cerqueira, Manuel D.; Chow, Benjamin J W; Di Carli, Marcelo F.; Dorbala, Sharmila; Gewirtz, Henry; Gropler, Robert J.; Kaufmann, Philipp A.; Knaapen, Paul; Knuuti, Juhani; Merhige, Michael E.; Rentrop, K. Peter; Ruddy, Terrence D.; Schelbert, Heinrich R.; Schindler, Thomas H.; Schwaiger, Markus; Sdringola, Stefano; Vitarello, John; Williams, Kim A.; Gordon, Donald; Dilsizian, Vasken; Narula, Jagat.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 62, No. 18, 29.10.2013, p. 1639-1653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gould, KL, Johnson, NP, Bateman, TM, Beanlands, RS, Bengel, FM, Bober, R, Camici, PG, Cerqueira, MD, Chow, BJW, Di Carli, MF, Dorbala, S, Gewirtz, H, Gropler, RJ, Kaufmann, PA, Knaapen, P, Knuuti, J, Merhige, ME, Rentrop, KP, Ruddy, TD, Schelbert, HR, Schindler, TH, Schwaiger, M, Sdringola, S, Vitarello, J, Williams, KA, Gordon, D, Dilsizian, V & Narula, J 2013, 'Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease: Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, no. 18, pp. 1639-1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.076
Gould, K. Lance ; Johnson, Nils P. ; Bateman, Timothy M. ; Beanlands, Rob S. ; Bengel, Frank M. ; Bober, Robert ; Camici, Paolo G. ; Cerqueira, Manuel D. ; Chow, Benjamin J W ; Di Carli, Marcelo F. ; Dorbala, Sharmila ; Gewirtz, Henry ; Gropler, Robert J. ; Kaufmann, Philipp A. ; Knaapen, Paul ; Knuuti, Juhani ; Merhige, Michael E. ; Rentrop, K. Peter ; Ruddy, Terrence D. ; Schelbert, Heinrich R. ; Schindler, Thomas H. ; Schwaiger, Markus ; Sdringola, Stefano ; Vitarello, John ; Williams, Kim A. ; Gordon, Donald ; Dilsizian, Vasken ; Narula, Jagat. / Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease : Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013 ; Vol. 62, No. 18. pp. 1639-1653.
@article{2e0900e12da84d6eb5187d0df50a538e,
title = "Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease: Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making",
abstract = "Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology - pressure and flow - as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts that hold true for whatever technology measures coronary physiology directly and reliably, here focusing on positron emission tomography and its interplay with intracoronary measurements.",
keywords = "coronary flow, coronary physiology, ischemia, PET perfusion imaging, revascularization",
author = "Gould, {K. Lance} and Johnson, {Nils P.} and Bateman, {Timothy M.} and Beanlands, {Rob S.} and Bengel, {Frank M.} and Robert Bober and Camici, {Paolo G.} and Cerqueira, {Manuel D.} and Chow, {Benjamin J W} and {Di Carli}, {Marcelo F.} and Sharmila Dorbala and Henry Gewirtz and Gropler, {Robert J.} and Kaufmann, {Philipp A.} and Paul Knaapen and Juhani Knuuti and Merhige, {Michael E.} and Rentrop, {K. Peter} and Ruddy, {Terrence D.} and Schelbert, {Heinrich R.} and Schindler, {Thomas H.} and Markus Schwaiger and Stefano Sdringola and John Vitarello and Williams, {Kim A.} and Donald Gordon and Vasken Dilsizian and Jagat Narula",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.076",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "1639--1653",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease

T2 - Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making

AU - Gould, K. Lance

AU - Johnson, Nils P.

AU - Bateman, Timothy M.

AU - Beanlands, Rob S.

AU - Bengel, Frank M.

AU - Bober, Robert

AU - Camici, Paolo G.

AU - Cerqueira, Manuel D.

AU - Chow, Benjamin J W

AU - Di Carli, Marcelo F.

AU - Dorbala, Sharmila

AU - Gewirtz, Henry

AU - Gropler, Robert J.

AU - Kaufmann, Philipp A.

AU - Knaapen, Paul

AU - Knuuti, Juhani

AU - Merhige, Michael E.

AU - Rentrop, K. Peter

AU - Ruddy, Terrence D.

AU - Schelbert, Heinrich R.

AU - Schindler, Thomas H.

AU - Schwaiger, Markus

AU - Sdringola, Stefano

AU - Vitarello, John

AU - Williams, Kim A.

AU - Gordon, Donald

AU - Dilsizian, Vasken

AU - Narula, Jagat

PY - 2013/10/29

Y1 - 2013/10/29

N2 - Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology - pressure and flow - as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts that hold true for whatever technology measures coronary physiology directly and reliably, here focusing on positron emission tomography and its interplay with intracoronary measurements.

AB - Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology - pressure and flow - as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts that hold true for whatever technology measures coronary physiology directly and reliably, here focusing on positron emission tomography and its interplay with intracoronary measurements.

KW - coronary flow

KW - coronary physiology

KW - ischemia

KW - PET perfusion imaging

KW - revascularization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886425343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886425343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.076

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.076

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 1639

EP - 1653

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 18

ER -