Analysis of public oral toxicity data from REACH registrations 2008-2014

Thomas Luechtefeld, Alexandra Maertens, Daniel P. Russo, Costanza Rovida, Hao Zhu, Thomas Hartung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The European Chemicals Agency, ECHA, made available a total of 13,832 oral toxicity studies for 8,568 substances up to December 2014. 75% of studies were from the retired OECD Test Guideline 401 (11% TG 420, 11% TG 423 and 1.5% TG 425). Concordance across guidelines, evaluated by comparing LD50 values ≥ 2,000 or <2,000 mg/ kg bodyweight from chemicals tested multiple times between different guidelines, was at least 75% and for their own repetition more than 90%. In 2009, Bulgheroni et al. created a simple model for predicting acute oral toxicity using no observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) from 28-day repeated dose toxicity studies in rats. This was reproduced here for 1,625 substances. In 2014, Taylor et al. suggested no added value of the 90-day repeated dose oral toxicity test given the availability of a low 28-day study with some constraints. We confirm that the 28-day NOAEL is predictive (albeit imperfectly) of 90-day NOAELs, however, the suggested constraints did not affect predictivity. 1,059 substances with acute oral toxicity data (268 positives, 791 negatives, all Klimisch score 1) were used for modeling: The Chemical Development Kit was used to generate 27 molecular descriptors and a similarity-informed multilayer perceptron showing 71% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Additionally, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm indicated that similarity-based approaches alone may be poor predictors of acute oral toxicity, but can be used to inform the multilayer perceptron model, where this was the feature with the highest information value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-122
Number of pages12
JournalAltex
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level
Neural Networks (Computer)
Guidelines
Toxicity Tests
Lethal Dose 50
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Acute toxicity
  • Chemical safety
  • Computational toxicology
  • Ld50
  • Regulatory toxicology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medical Laboratory Technology
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Luechtefeld, T., Maertens, A., Russo, D. P., Rovida, C., Zhu, H., & Hartung, T. (2016). Analysis of public oral toxicity data from REACH registrations 2008-2014. Altex, 33(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1510054

Analysis of public oral toxicity data from REACH registrations 2008-2014. / Luechtefeld, Thomas; Maertens, Alexandra; Russo, Daniel P.; Rovida, Costanza; Zhu, Hao; Hartung, Thomas.

In: Altex, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2016, p. 111-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Luechtefeld, T, Maertens, A, Russo, DP, Rovida, C, Zhu, H & Hartung, T 2016, 'Analysis of public oral toxicity data from REACH registrations 2008-2014', Altex, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 111-122. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1510054
Luechtefeld, Thomas ; Maertens, Alexandra ; Russo, Daniel P. ; Rovida, Costanza ; Zhu, Hao ; Hartung, Thomas. / Analysis of public oral toxicity data from REACH registrations 2008-2014. In: Altex. 2016 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 111-122.
@article{9e45219911c74ffda560965f273b40fa,
title = "Analysis of public oral toxicity data from REACH registrations 2008-2014",
abstract = "The European Chemicals Agency, ECHA, made available a total of 13,832 oral toxicity studies for 8,568 substances up to December 2014. 75{\%} of studies were from the retired OECD Test Guideline 401 (11{\%} TG 420, 11{\%} TG 423 and 1.5{\%} TG 425). Concordance across guidelines, evaluated by comparing LD50 values ≥ 2,000 or <2,000 mg/ kg bodyweight from chemicals tested multiple times between different guidelines, was at least 75{\%} and for their own repetition more than 90{\%}. In 2009, Bulgheroni et al. created a simple model for predicting acute oral toxicity using no observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) from 28-day repeated dose toxicity studies in rats. This was reproduced here for 1,625 substances. In 2014, Taylor et al. suggested no added value of the 90-day repeated dose oral toxicity test given the availability of a low 28-day study with some constraints. We confirm that the 28-day NOAEL is predictive (albeit imperfectly) of 90-day NOAELs, however, the suggested constraints did not affect predictivity. 1,059 substances with acute oral toxicity data (268 positives, 791 negatives, all Klimisch score 1) were used for modeling: The Chemical Development Kit was used to generate 27 molecular descriptors and a similarity-informed multilayer perceptron showing 71{\%} sensitivity and 72{\%} specificity. Additionally, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm indicated that similarity-based approaches alone may be poor predictors of acute oral toxicity, but can be used to inform the multilayer perceptron model, where this was the feature with the highest information value.",
keywords = "Acute toxicity, Chemical safety, Computational toxicology, Ld50, Regulatory toxicology",
author = "Thomas Luechtefeld and Alexandra Maertens and Russo, {Daniel P.} and Costanza Rovida and Hao Zhu and Thomas Hartung",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.14573/altex.1510054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "111--122",
journal = "ALTEX : Alternativen zu Tierexperimenten",
issn = "1868-596X",
publisher = "Elsevier GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of public oral toxicity data from REACH registrations 2008-2014

AU - Luechtefeld, Thomas

AU - Maertens, Alexandra

AU - Russo, Daniel P.

AU - Rovida, Costanza

AU - Zhu, Hao

AU - Hartung, Thomas

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The European Chemicals Agency, ECHA, made available a total of 13,832 oral toxicity studies for 8,568 substances up to December 2014. 75% of studies were from the retired OECD Test Guideline 401 (11% TG 420, 11% TG 423 and 1.5% TG 425). Concordance across guidelines, evaluated by comparing LD50 values ≥ 2,000 or <2,000 mg/ kg bodyweight from chemicals tested multiple times between different guidelines, was at least 75% and for their own repetition more than 90%. In 2009, Bulgheroni et al. created a simple model for predicting acute oral toxicity using no observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) from 28-day repeated dose toxicity studies in rats. This was reproduced here for 1,625 substances. In 2014, Taylor et al. suggested no added value of the 90-day repeated dose oral toxicity test given the availability of a low 28-day study with some constraints. We confirm that the 28-day NOAEL is predictive (albeit imperfectly) of 90-day NOAELs, however, the suggested constraints did not affect predictivity. 1,059 substances with acute oral toxicity data (268 positives, 791 negatives, all Klimisch score 1) were used for modeling: The Chemical Development Kit was used to generate 27 molecular descriptors and a similarity-informed multilayer perceptron showing 71% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Additionally, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm indicated that similarity-based approaches alone may be poor predictors of acute oral toxicity, but can be used to inform the multilayer perceptron model, where this was the feature with the highest information value.

AB - The European Chemicals Agency, ECHA, made available a total of 13,832 oral toxicity studies for 8,568 substances up to December 2014. 75% of studies were from the retired OECD Test Guideline 401 (11% TG 420, 11% TG 423 and 1.5% TG 425). Concordance across guidelines, evaluated by comparing LD50 values ≥ 2,000 or <2,000 mg/ kg bodyweight from chemicals tested multiple times between different guidelines, was at least 75% and for their own repetition more than 90%. In 2009, Bulgheroni et al. created a simple model for predicting acute oral toxicity using no observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) from 28-day repeated dose toxicity studies in rats. This was reproduced here for 1,625 substances. In 2014, Taylor et al. suggested no added value of the 90-day repeated dose oral toxicity test given the availability of a low 28-day study with some constraints. We confirm that the 28-day NOAEL is predictive (albeit imperfectly) of 90-day NOAELs, however, the suggested constraints did not affect predictivity. 1,059 substances with acute oral toxicity data (268 positives, 791 negatives, all Klimisch score 1) were used for modeling: The Chemical Development Kit was used to generate 27 molecular descriptors and a similarity-informed multilayer perceptron showing 71% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Additionally, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm indicated that similarity-based approaches alone may be poor predictors of acute oral toxicity, but can be used to inform the multilayer perceptron model, where this was the feature with the highest information value.

KW - Acute toxicity

KW - Chemical safety

KW - Computational toxicology

KW - Ld50

KW - Regulatory toxicology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962786551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962786551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14573/altex.1510054

DO - 10.14573/altex.1510054

M3 - Article

C2 - 26863198

AN - SCOPUS:84962786551

VL - 33

SP - 111

EP - 122

JO - ALTEX : Alternativen zu Tierexperimenten

JF - ALTEX : Alternativen zu Tierexperimenten

SN - 1868-596X

IS - 2

ER -