Analysing spatially referenced public health data: A comparison of three methodological approaches

Christine E. Dunn, Simon P. Kingham, Barry Rowlingson, Raj S. Bhopal, Samantha Cockings, Chris J W Foy, Sushma D. Acquilla, Jane Halpin, Peter Diggle, David Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the analysis of spatially referenced public health data, members of different disciplinary groups (geographers, epidemiologists and statisticians) tend to select different methodological approaches, usually those with which they are already familiar. This paper compares three such approaches in terms of their relative value and results. A single public health dataset, derived from a community survey, is analysed by using 'traditional' epidemiological methods, GIS and point pattern analysis. Since they adopt different 'models' for addressing the same research question, the three approaches produce some variation in the results for specific health-related variables. Taken overall, however, the results complement, rather than contradict or duplicate each other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalHealth and Place
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public health
Public Health
Epidemiologic Methods
statistician
Geographical Information System
Health
health
GIS
Research
community
Group
comparison
analysis
Epidemiologists
Datasets
Surveys and Questionnaires
method

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • GIS
  • Point pattern analysis
  • Public health data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Development
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Dunn, C. E., Kingham, S. P., Rowlingson, B., Bhopal, R. S., Cockings, S., Foy, C. J. W., ... Walker, D. (2001). Analysing spatially referenced public health data: A comparison of three methodological approaches. Health and Place, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00033-2

Analysing spatially referenced public health data : A comparison of three methodological approaches. / Dunn, Christine E.; Kingham, Simon P.; Rowlingson, Barry; Bhopal, Raj S.; Cockings, Samantha; Foy, Chris J W; Acquilla, Sushma D.; Halpin, Jane; Diggle, Peter; Walker, David.

In: Health and Place, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2001, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dunn, CE, Kingham, SP, Rowlingson, B, Bhopal, RS, Cockings, S, Foy, CJW, Acquilla, SD, Halpin, J, Diggle, P & Walker, D 2001, 'Analysing spatially referenced public health data: A comparison of three methodological approaches', Health and Place, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00033-2
Dunn, Christine E. ; Kingham, Simon P. ; Rowlingson, Barry ; Bhopal, Raj S. ; Cockings, Samantha ; Foy, Chris J W ; Acquilla, Sushma D. ; Halpin, Jane ; Diggle, Peter ; Walker, David. / Analysing spatially referenced public health data : A comparison of three methodological approaches. In: Health and Place. 2001 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 1-12.
@article{f90ad709988143a6aafd3d8b1c914115,
title = "Analysing spatially referenced public health data: A comparison of three methodological approaches",
abstract = "In the analysis of spatially referenced public health data, members of different disciplinary groups (geographers, epidemiologists and statisticians) tend to select different methodological approaches, usually those with which they are already familiar. This paper compares three such approaches in terms of their relative value and results. A single public health dataset, derived from a community survey, is analysed by using 'traditional' epidemiological methods, GIS and point pattern analysis. Since they adopt different 'models' for addressing the same research question, the three approaches produce some variation in the results for specific health-related variables. Taken overall, however, the results complement, rather than contradict or duplicate each other.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, GIS, Point pattern analysis, Public health data",
author = "Dunn, {Christine E.} and Kingham, {Simon P.} and Barry Rowlingson and Bhopal, {Raj S.} and Samantha Cockings and Foy, {Chris J W} and Acquilla, {Sushma D.} and Jane Halpin and Peter Diggle and David Walker",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00033-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Health and Place",
issn = "1353-8292",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysing spatially referenced public health data

T2 - A comparison of three methodological approaches

AU - Dunn, Christine E.

AU - Kingham, Simon P.

AU - Rowlingson, Barry

AU - Bhopal, Raj S.

AU - Cockings, Samantha

AU - Foy, Chris J W

AU - Acquilla, Sushma D.

AU - Halpin, Jane

AU - Diggle, Peter

AU - Walker, David

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - In the analysis of spatially referenced public health data, members of different disciplinary groups (geographers, epidemiologists and statisticians) tend to select different methodological approaches, usually those with which they are already familiar. This paper compares three such approaches in terms of their relative value and results. A single public health dataset, derived from a community survey, is analysed by using 'traditional' epidemiological methods, GIS and point pattern analysis. Since they adopt different 'models' for addressing the same research question, the three approaches produce some variation in the results for specific health-related variables. Taken overall, however, the results complement, rather than contradict or duplicate each other.

AB - In the analysis of spatially referenced public health data, members of different disciplinary groups (geographers, epidemiologists and statisticians) tend to select different methodological approaches, usually those with which they are already familiar. This paper compares three such approaches in terms of their relative value and results. A single public health dataset, derived from a community survey, is analysed by using 'traditional' epidemiological methods, GIS and point pattern analysis. Since they adopt different 'models' for addressing the same research question, the three approaches produce some variation in the results for specific health-related variables. Taken overall, however, the results complement, rather than contradict or duplicate each other.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - GIS

KW - Point pattern analysis

KW - Public health data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035137728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035137728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00033-2

DO - 10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00033-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 11165151

AN - SCOPUS:0035137728

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Health and Place

JF - Health and Place

SN - 1353-8292

IS - 1

ER -