An update on the salt wars - Genuine controversy, poor science, or vested interest?

Bruce Neal, Mary Anne Land, Mark Woodward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is unequivocal evidence that increased sodium intake is associated with increased blood pressure, and that increased blood pressure leads to increased risk of vascular diseases. Unfortunately, the published evidence directly linking sodium intake to vascular risk is inconsistent and confusing. This review, emphasising recent developments in national and international settings, considers why this is the case and how vested interests - particularly the food industry - have exploited the vacuum. We argue that legislation is the only tool that is likely to reverse the current situation wherein many millions of lives are put at risk through an unnecessary dietary additive, the reduction of which would be eminently feasible and have no conceivable disadvantage to health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-693
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Hypertension Reports
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Salts
Sodium
Blood Pressure
Food Industry
Vacuum
Legislation
Vascular Diseases
Blood Vessels
Health
Warfare

Keywords

  • Behaviour
  • Blood pressure
  • Cohort study
  • Food industry
  • Hypertension
  • Meta-analysis
  • Policy
  • Regulation
  • Salt
  • Trial
  • Vascular disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

An update on the salt wars - Genuine controversy, poor science, or vested interest? / Neal, Bruce; Land, Mary Anne; Woodward, Mark.

In: Current Hypertension Reports, Vol. 15, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 687-693.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neal, Bruce ; Land, Mary Anne ; Woodward, Mark. / An update on the salt wars - Genuine controversy, poor science, or vested interest?. In: Current Hypertension Reports. 2013 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 687-693.
@article{f8058cdfd72e41ca8209dfc11c22335d,
title = "An update on the salt wars - Genuine controversy, poor science, or vested interest?",
abstract = "There is unequivocal evidence that increased sodium intake is associated with increased blood pressure, and that increased blood pressure leads to increased risk of vascular diseases. Unfortunately, the published evidence directly linking sodium intake to vascular risk is inconsistent and confusing. This review, emphasising recent developments in national and international settings, considers why this is the case and how vested interests - particularly the food industry - have exploited the vacuum. We argue that legislation is the only tool that is likely to reverse the current situation wherein many millions of lives are put at risk through an unnecessary dietary additive, the reduction of which would be eminently feasible and have no conceivable disadvantage to health.",
keywords = "Behaviour, Blood pressure, Cohort study, Food industry, Hypertension, Meta-analysis, Policy, Regulation, Salt, Trial, Vascular disease",
author = "Bruce Neal and Land, {Mary Anne} and Mark Woodward",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11906-013-0389-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "687--693",
journal = "Current Hypertension Reports",
issn = "1522-6417",
publisher = "Current Medicine Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An update on the salt wars - Genuine controversy, poor science, or vested interest?

AU - Neal, Bruce

AU - Land, Mary Anne

AU - Woodward, Mark

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - There is unequivocal evidence that increased sodium intake is associated with increased blood pressure, and that increased blood pressure leads to increased risk of vascular diseases. Unfortunately, the published evidence directly linking sodium intake to vascular risk is inconsistent and confusing. This review, emphasising recent developments in national and international settings, considers why this is the case and how vested interests - particularly the food industry - have exploited the vacuum. We argue that legislation is the only tool that is likely to reverse the current situation wherein many millions of lives are put at risk through an unnecessary dietary additive, the reduction of which would be eminently feasible and have no conceivable disadvantage to health.

AB - There is unequivocal evidence that increased sodium intake is associated with increased blood pressure, and that increased blood pressure leads to increased risk of vascular diseases. Unfortunately, the published evidence directly linking sodium intake to vascular risk is inconsistent and confusing. This review, emphasising recent developments in national and international settings, considers why this is the case and how vested interests - particularly the food industry - have exploited the vacuum. We argue that legislation is the only tool that is likely to reverse the current situation wherein many millions of lives are put at risk through an unnecessary dietary additive, the reduction of which would be eminently feasible and have no conceivable disadvantage to health.

KW - Behaviour

KW - Blood pressure

KW - Cohort study

KW - Food industry

KW - Hypertension

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Policy

KW - Regulation

KW - Salt

KW - Trial

KW - Vascular disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890116331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890116331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11906-013-0389-5

DO - 10.1007/s11906-013-0389-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 24170199

AN - SCOPUS:84890116331

VL - 15

SP - 687

EP - 693

JO - Current Hypertension Reports

JF - Current Hypertension Reports

SN - 1522-6417

IS - 6

ER -