An introduction to the collaborative methodology and its potential use for the management of heart failure.

Phillip J. Newton, Patricia M Davidson, Elizabeth J. Halcomb, A. Robert Denniss, Fidye Westgarth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is responsible for significant disease burden in developed countries internationally. Despite significant advances and a strong evidence base in therapies and treatment strategies for HF, access to these therapies continues to remain elusive to a significant proportion of the HF population. The reasons for this are multifactorial and range from the financial cost of treatments to the individual attitudes and beliefs of clinicians. The collaborative methodology, based upon a quality improvement philosophy, has been identified as a potentially useful tool to address this treatment gap. AIM: In this manuscript, we review the published literature on the collaborative methodology and assess the evidence for achieving improvement in the management of HF. METHODS: Searches of electronic databases, the reference lists of published materials, policy documents, and the Internet were conducted using key words including "collaborative methodology," "breakthrough series," "quality improvement," "total quality improvement," and "heart failure." Because of the paucity of high-level evidence, all English-language articles were included in the review. RESULTS: On the basis of the identified search strategy, 43 articles were retrieved. Key themes that emerged from the literature included the following: (1) The collaborative methodology has a significant potential to reduce the treatment gap. (2) Leadership is an important characteristic of the collaborative method. (3) The collaborative methodology facilitates sustainability of the quality improvement process. CONCLUSION: The collaborative methodology, when implemented and conducted according to key conceptual principles, has significant potential to improve the outcomes of patients, particularly those with HF and chronic cardiovascular disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Volume21
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heart Failure
Quality Improvement
Therapeutics
Developed Countries
Health Care Costs
Internet
Chronic Disease
Cardiovascular Diseases
Language
Databases
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

An introduction to the collaborative methodology and its potential use for the management of heart failure. / Newton, Phillip J.; Davidson, Patricia M; Halcomb, Elizabeth J.; Denniss, A. Robert; Westgarth, Fidye.

In: The Journal of cardiovascular nursing, Vol. 21, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 161-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newton, Phillip J. ; Davidson, Patricia M ; Halcomb, Elizabeth J. ; Denniss, A. Robert ; Westgarth, Fidye. / An introduction to the collaborative methodology and its potential use for the management of heart failure. In: The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 161-168.
@article{57c93afd72444f2385c80d28ba10618b,
title = "An introduction to the collaborative methodology and its potential use for the management of heart failure.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is responsible for significant disease burden in developed countries internationally. Despite significant advances and a strong evidence base in therapies and treatment strategies for HF, access to these therapies continues to remain elusive to a significant proportion of the HF population. The reasons for this are multifactorial and range from the financial cost of treatments to the individual attitudes and beliefs of clinicians. The collaborative methodology, based upon a quality improvement philosophy, has been identified as a potentially useful tool to address this treatment gap. AIM: In this manuscript, we review the published literature on the collaborative methodology and assess the evidence for achieving improvement in the management of HF. METHODS: Searches of electronic databases, the reference lists of published materials, policy documents, and the Internet were conducted using key words including {"}collaborative methodology,{"} {"}breakthrough series,{"} {"}quality improvement,{"} {"}total quality improvement,{"} and {"}heart failure.{"} Because of the paucity of high-level evidence, all English-language articles were included in the review. RESULTS: On the basis of the identified search strategy, 43 articles were retrieved. Key themes that emerged from the literature included the following: (1) The collaborative methodology has a significant potential to reduce the treatment gap. (2) Leadership is an important characteristic of the collaborative method. (3) The collaborative methodology facilitates sustainability of the quality improvement process. CONCLUSION: The collaborative methodology, when implemented and conducted according to key conceptual principles, has significant potential to improve the outcomes of patients, particularly those with HF and chronic cardiovascular disease.",
author = "Newton, {Phillip J.} and Davidson, {Patricia M} and Halcomb, {Elizabeth J.} and Denniss, {A. Robert} and Fidye Westgarth",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "161--168",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing",
issn = "0889-4655",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An introduction to the collaborative methodology and its potential use for the management of heart failure.

AU - Newton, Phillip J.

AU - Davidson, Patricia M

AU - Halcomb, Elizabeth J.

AU - Denniss, A. Robert

AU - Westgarth, Fidye

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is responsible for significant disease burden in developed countries internationally. Despite significant advances and a strong evidence base in therapies and treatment strategies for HF, access to these therapies continues to remain elusive to a significant proportion of the HF population. The reasons for this are multifactorial and range from the financial cost of treatments to the individual attitudes and beliefs of clinicians. The collaborative methodology, based upon a quality improvement philosophy, has been identified as a potentially useful tool to address this treatment gap. AIM: In this manuscript, we review the published literature on the collaborative methodology and assess the evidence for achieving improvement in the management of HF. METHODS: Searches of electronic databases, the reference lists of published materials, policy documents, and the Internet were conducted using key words including "collaborative methodology," "breakthrough series," "quality improvement," "total quality improvement," and "heart failure." Because of the paucity of high-level evidence, all English-language articles were included in the review. RESULTS: On the basis of the identified search strategy, 43 articles were retrieved. Key themes that emerged from the literature included the following: (1) The collaborative methodology has a significant potential to reduce the treatment gap. (2) Leadership is an important characteristic of the collaborative method. (3) The collaborative methodology facilitates sustainability of the quality improvement process. CONCLUSION: The collaborative methodology, when implemented and conducted according to key conceptual principles, has significant potential to improve the outcomes of patients, particularly those with HF and chronic cardiovascular disease.

AB - BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is responsible for significant disease burden in developed countries internationally. Despite significant advances and a strong evidence base in therapies and treatment strategies for HF, access to these therapies continues to remain elusive to a significant proportion of the HF population. The reasons for this are multifactorial and range from the financial cost of treatments to the individual attitudes and beliefs of clinicians. The collaborative methodology, based upon a quality improvement philosophy, has been identified as a potentially useful tool to address this treatment gap. AIM: In this manuscript, we review the published literature on the collaborative methodology and assess the evidence for achieving improvement in the management of HF. METHODS: Searches of electronic databases, the reference lists of published materials, policy documents, and the Internet were conducted using key words including "collaborative methodology," "breakthrough series," "quality improvement," "total quality improvement," and "heart failure." Because of the paucity of high-level evidence, all English-language articles were included in the review. RESULTS: On the basis of the identified search strategy, 43 articles were retrieved. Key themes that emerged from the literature included the following: (1) The collaborative methodology has a significant potential to reduce the treatment gap. (2) Leadership is an important characteristic of the collaborative method. (3) The collaborative methodology facilitates sustainability of the quality improvement process. CONCLUSION: The collaborative methodology, when implemented and conducted according to key conceptual principles, has significant potential to improve the outcomes of patients, particularly those with HF and chronic cardiovascular disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745663536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745663536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16699354

AN - SCOPUS:33745663536

VL - 21

SP - 161

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

SN - 0889-4655

IS - 3

ER -